Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートEmployee & HR
360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review
Gathers structured multi-rater feedback—from managers, peers, direct reports, and self—on an employee's core competencies and overall effectiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete behavioral examples behind the ratings, turning vague impressions into specific, actionable evidence for development conversations.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全13問・約7分
Q02
選択式必須
What is your working relationship with (Employee Name)?
- Manager
- Direct report
- Peer / colleague
- Cross-functional partner
- Self-assessment (this is my own review)
Q03
マトリクス必須
Rate (Employee Name) on each area based on what you've directly observed in the last review period.
6行 × 5列
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- ほか1件
列: Needs improvement · Below expectations · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations · Outstanding
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how effective is (Employee Name) in their current role?
スケール: 1 – 10
最小:Not effective at all最大:Extremely effective
Q05
選択式必須
Which one area best describes (Employee Name)'s greatest strength right now?
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- Adaptability to change
Q06
選択式必須
Which one area is the biggest opportunity for (Employee Name) to grow?
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- Adaptability to change
Q07
AIインタビュー
Probe for a specific, recent example that illustrates both the strength and the growth area the respondent selected: what exactly did (Employee Name) do, in what situation, and what was the observable impact on the team or work? Anchor back to their overall effectiveness rating and ask what would need to change for that score to go up. If the respondent gave uniformly high ratings with no concrete detail, push gently for one real moment rather than a general impression; if they gave low ratings, ask what they'd want (Employee Name) to try differently in the next 30 days.
Q08
自由回答（長文）
Describe one specific, recent example where you saw (Employee Name) demonstrate the strength you selected above. What did they do, and what was the impact?
Q09
自由回答（長文）
What's one thing (Employee Name) could start, stop, or do differently to be more effective in their role?
Q10
オピニオンスケール
How likely would you be to choose to work with (Employee Name) again on a future project or team?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q11
選択式
How long have you worked with (Employee Name)?
- Less than 6 months
- 6-12 months
- 1-2 years
- More than 2 years
- Prefer not to say
Q12
プルダウン
Which department are you in? (Template note: replace with your own department list before launching.)
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Operations
- Customer Support
- People / HR
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ
That completes (Employee Name)'s 360-degree review. Thank you for the thoughtful feedback — it will be synthesized alongside other reviewers' input and shared with the employee's manager to support their development plan.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes for a recent, concrete example illustrating both the rated strength and growth area — turning vague ratings into actionable evidence, not just a static comment box
- Combines structured multi-rater inputs (manager, peer, direct report, self) via a working-relationship question with matrix competency ratings, an overall effectiveness opinion scale, and open strength/growth pickers in one flow
- Pairs quantitative signals (competency matrix, effectiveness scale, 'work with again' likelihood scale) with qualitative long-text prompts on specific behaviors and one thing to start/stop/do differently — built for real development conversations, not just scoring
- Uses transparent, visible prompts throughout (the AI follow-up interview's probing intent is stated in plain language) rather than a black-box adaptive engine
Jotform
360 Degree Review Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable 360 review form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, likely with rating fields and comment boxes. Good for quick deployment and integration with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a static form template rather than an interview-driven feedback tool. No indication of adaptive follow-up or automated qualitative analysis of open responses.
優れている点
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
- Likely supports standard rating scales and comment fields for quick setup
- Broad integrations with Jotform's app ecosystem (e.g., for storage, notifications)
物足りない点
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up to probe vague ratings for concrete behavioral examples
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how responses are structured or scored
- No voice AI interview option for raters who prefer speaking over typing
QuestionPro
360-degree Review Survey TemplateA survey-platform template for 360 reviews with QuestionPro's standard survey logic (branching, scales, reporting dashboards). It's positioned as a fielding-ready enterprise survey template with decent reporting depth, but like most survey tools it relies on fixed question sets rather than dynamic interviewing. No mention of AI-driven probing or per-response quality scoring.
優れている点
- Enterprise-grade survey platform with established reporting and dashboard tools
- Likely supports skip logic and multiple rater types within one survey
- Established analytics suite for aggregating multi-rater scores
物足りない点
- Fixed question sequence — no adaptive AI interview to dig deeper into individual answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring of open-text feedback
- No transparent, visible AI prompt methodology published on the page
SurveySparrow
Manager 360 Feedback TemplateA conversational-style survey template focused specifically on manager 360 feedback, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel more natural. It's a fielding-ready template but scoped to manager feedback rather than full multi-rater (peer/direct-report/self) review, and the conversational format is scripted rather than adaptively AI-driven.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style interface that may feel more engaging than a static form
- Purpose-built framing for manager-specific feedback
- Mobile-friendly presentation typical of SurveySparrow's product
物足りない点
- Narrower scope (manager feedback) versus a full multi-rater 360 including peers, direct reports, and self
- Conversational UI is pre-scripted, not adaptive — no AI follow-up that probes individual answers for specifics
- No indication of automated quality scoring or voice AI interview capability
Typeform
360 Degree Review Form TemplateA polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time form template well-suited to 360 reviews, leveraging Typeform's known strength in respondent experience. It's fielding-ready out of the box, but it's a fixed form flow — there's no dynamic AI interviewing to follow up on vague or generic answers with targeted probing.
優れている点
- Clean, one-question-at-a-time UX that Typeform is well known for
- Easy to customize branding and question wording
- Likely mobile-responsive and quick to deploy
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — all questions are fixed regardless of how a rater answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring or structured behavioral-evidence extraction
- No published prompt transparency or voice AI interview option
よくあるご質問
「360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking part in (Employee Name)'s 360-degree review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized…」・「What is your working relationship with (Employee Name)?」・「Rate (Employee Name) on each area based on what you've directly observed in the last review period.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。