360 Multi-Rater Feedback: Competencies, Strengths & Development
A structured 360-degree feedback instrument for peers, managers, and cross-functional partners to assess colleague competencies, identify strengths, and surface development priorities. Designed for any team seeking actionable, confidential multi-rater insights.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Which best describes your current working relationship with this colleague?
- I manage them
- They manage me
- Peer on my team
- Cross-functional partner
- Project collaborator (short-term)
- Other (please specify)
The following questions ask you to rate this colleague on key workplace competencies based on your observations over the last 3 months. Please answer based on what you have personally observed.
Rank the following areas from this colleague's greatest strength (1st) to least strength.
- Communication
- Reliability and execution
- Problem-solving and initiative
- Collaboration
- Adaptability
- Accountability
- Stakeholder management
- Strategic thinking
How would you rate this colleague's overall impact on team outcomes in the last 3 months?
This section uses a 'Start, Stop, Continue' framework. Please share specific, constructive observations.
How likely would you be to choose to work with this colleague again on a future project?
What is your current role level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Executive / senior leader
- Other
Thank you for your feedback. Your insights will directly support your colleague's development and growth. As a reminder, your responses are confidential and will be shared in aggregate only. No individual responses will be attributed to you.
How long have you worked with this colleague?
- Less than 1 month
- 1–3 months
- 3–6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–2 years
- More than 2 years
Overall, how effective is this colleague in their current role?
Which areas would most benefit from this colleague's development in the next 3–6 months? (Select up to 3)
- Customer understanding
- Analytical skills
- Written communication
- Verbal communication
- Prioritization and focus
- Stakeholder management
- Project execution
- Process improvement
- Leadership and mentoring
- Other (please specify)
Briefly describe a recent example where this colleague made a meaningful impact on the team or business.
What is one thing this colleague should definitely continue doing?
Based on the feedback you've shared throughout this survey, is there anything else you'd like to add about this colleague's strengths, areas for growth, or how they could have an even greater impact?
What is your primary function?
- Product
- Engineering
- Data / Analytics
- Design / UX
- Marketing
- Sales
- Operations / Customer Support
- Finance / Legal / HR
- Other
How often do you currently collaborate with this colleague?
- Daily
- A few times per week
- Weekly
- A few times per month
- Less than monthly
This colleague communicates ideas clearly and effectively.
What is one thing this colleague should start doing to improve?
How long have you been at the company?
- Less than 3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- More than 5 years
This colleague delivers high-quality work on time.
What is one thing this colleague should stop doing?
This colleague takes initiative and solves problems proactively.
What support or resources would most help this colleague grow?
This colleague collaborates well across teams and functions.
This colleague adapts quickly to changing priorities or new information.
This colleague gives and receives feedback constructively.
This colleague demonstrates accountability for their commitments and results.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Combines structured rating scales (role effectiveness, communication, quality, initiative, collaboration, adaptability, feedback, accountability) with a ranking question to surface relative strengths, not just averages
- Uses a 'Start, Stop, Continue' open-text framework to generate concrete, actionable development suggestions rather than generic ratings
- Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes any rater's earlier answers for specifics, so nuance isn't lost to a static form
- Captures rater context (relationship, tenure, collaboration frequency, role level, function) so results can be segmented and reported automatically
Jotform
Professional Development Feedback Survey Form TemplateA fielding-ready form focused on individual professional development feedback rather than structured multi-rater (peer/manager/cross-functional) 360 assessment. Good for quick, general feedback collection but lacks the ranking, strength/development-area, and Start-Stop-Continue structure of a true 360 instrument. Easy to customize visually via Jotform's form builder.
優れている点
- Simple, quick-to-deploy form builder
- Customizable fields and branding
- Broad templates library for HR use cases
物足りない点
- No adaptive follow-up questioning — fixed static question set
- Not built as a multi-rater 360 instrument with role/relationship segmentation
- No published scoring or quality methodology for open responses
Typeform
Professional Development Feedback Survey TemplateA conversational-style form aimed at general professional development feedback, not specifically a peer/manager/cross-functional 360 review. Typeform's format is engaging and mobile-friendly, but the template appears to be a single-rater feedback flow rather than a full multi-rater competency assessment with ranking and development-area selection.
優れている点
- Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI
- Mobile-friendly, visually engaging design
- Easy embedding and sharing
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI probing on open-ended answers
- Not structured for multi-rater (peer/manager/cross-functional) collection with rater-role segmentation
- No transparent scoring methodology for qualitative responses
SurveySparrow
Manager 360 Feedback TemplateA genuinely comparable 360-degree feedback template, though scoped specifically to manager evaluation rather than general colleague-to-colleague multi-rater feedback across peers and cross-functional partners. Likely covers competency ratings similar to ours, but as a static form without adaptive interviewing or automated quality scoring of open-text responses.
優れている点
- Purpose-built 360 feedback format
- Conversational survey style with branching logic options
- Established templates for manager-focused HR review cycles
物足りない点
- Static question flow — no adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into vague answers
- No published per-response quality scoring for open-text feedback
- Scoped to manager feedback rather than broader peer/cross-functional 360 coverage
よくあるご質問
「360 Multi-Rater Feedback: Competencies, Strengths & Development」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が28問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the 360 Feedback Survey. Thank you for taking the time to share candid, constructive feedback to help your c…」・「Which best describes your current working relationship with this colleague?」・「The following questions ask you to rate this colleague on key workplace competencies based on your observations over the…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、28問を約12分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。