Employee Performance Review & Development Check-In
A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, covering goal progress, core competencies, manager support, and development priorities — paired with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the story behind the ratings, not just the numbers, for richer 1:1 prep and calibration.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Rate your own performance in each area this review period.
- Job knowledge & skills
- Quality of work
- Communication
- Collaboration with others
- Initiative & ownership
Overall, how would you rate your performance this review period?
Which best describes your progress on the goals set at your last review?
- Completed all goals
- Completed most goals
- Completed about half
- Completed few or none
- Goals changed or were unclear during the period
Rank these areas by how much you'd like to focus on developing them next period (most important first).
- Technical or job-specific skills
- Leadership & people management
- Communication & influence
- Time management & prioritization
- Strategic or big-picture thinking
- Cross-team collaboration
Thinking about a typical week, allocate 100 points across where your effort actually went this period.
- Core deliverables & assigned work
- Helping or mentoring others
- Process or tooling improvements
- Learning & skill development
- Meetings & administrative tasks
How supported did you feel by your manager this period?
Anchor on the respondent's overall performance rating and their goal-progress answer. Get them to describe one specific accomplishment they're proud of and one concrete obstacle that got in the way of doing more — ask what actually happened, not just how they feel. If they rated manager support low, probe for a specific moment support was missing and what would have helped. If goals were 'unclear' or 'changed', find out where the clarity broke down.
Which department or team are you part of?
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- (Replace with Department D)
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been in your current role?
- Less than 6 months
- 6-12 months
- 1-2 years
- 3-5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Thanks for taking the time to reflect on this period. Your manager will use these responses, alongside your discussion together, to prepare a fair and specific review — individual answers aren't shared outside that process without your knowledge.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Pairs a structured self-assessment (goal-progress rating, competency matrix, effort allocation, manager-support rating) with an AI follow-up interview that specifically anchors on the respondent's overall rating and goal-progress answers to dig into the story behind the numbers.
- Includes a ranking exercise so employees prioritize development focus areas for next period, not just rate the past one.
- Uses a constant-sum question to reveal where effort actually went in a typical week, surfacing gaps between perceived and actual focus for richer manager calibration.
- Closes with a clear chat message setting expectations that the manager will use these reflections in the review — framing the whole check-in as review prep, not just data collection.
QuestionPro
Employee Performance Review SurveyA fielding-ready static survey template covering standard performance review question areas. It's built for straightforward distribution and reporting rather than exploratory follow-up. Good baseline coverage but relies entirely on pre-written questions.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use template within an established survey platform
- Likely supports standard skip logic and reporting dashboards
- Covers common performance review question types
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind a given rating — every respondent sees the same fixed questions
- No voice AI interview option for richer qualitative capture
- No published methodology on how questions were validated or scored
SurveySparrow
Sample Product Manager Performance Review Template | Evaluate Manager PerformanceThis template is scoped specifically to evaluating a Product Manager's performance (typically by peers/reports), rather than a general employee self-assessment for review cycles — a narrower use case than QuestionPunk's template. It's a static, ready-to-send form built on SurveySparrow's conversational-style survey UI. Useful as a role-specific reference but not a direct substitute for a broad self-assessment check-in.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-like question flow that feels less like a traditional form
- Purpose-built for evaluating a specific role (Product Manager)
- Likely mobile-friendly given SurveySparrow's product focus
物足りない点
- Narrower audience fit — built for manager evaluation, not general self-assessment across goal progress, competencies, and development priorities
- No adaptive AI interview to follow up on individual answers with tailored probing
- No transparent, inspectable prompt logic for how any follow-up questions are generated
SurveyMonkey
Employee Performance Survey TemplateA general-purpose, fielding-ready employee performance survey template on a widely-used survey platform. It offers broad coverage of performance topics but is a static questionnaire with no built-in interview or probing mechanism. Reporting is likely solid given SurveyMonkey's analytics tools, but depth comes only from however many questions are pre-written.
優れている点
- Established, easy-to-deploy survey platform with broad question-type support
- Likely benchmarking and analytics features via SurveyMonkey's reporting tools
- Familiar UI for both HR admins and respondents
物足りない点
- Static question set only — no adaptive AI follow-up to dig into the story behind a low or high rating
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
よくあるご質問
「Employee Performance Review & Development Check-In」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Hi! This check-in supports your upcoming performance review — it covers your goals, day-to-day work, and how supported y…」・「Rate your own performance in each area this review period.」・「Overall, how would you rate your performance this review period?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。