QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Peer Feedback and Working Relationship Survey

Gathers structured peer feedback on a specific colleague's collaboration, reliability, and communication habits, plus a best-worst ranking of their standout strengths. An AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example behind the ratings, so the feedback reads as evidence, not just scores.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全10問・約6分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to give feedback on a colleague. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Be specific and constructive — this helps them grow, and your responses will be shared thoughtfully. About 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

What is your working relationship with this person? (Template note: pair this survey with a single named colleague per send.)

  • Direct peer or teammate
  • Their manager
  • Their direct report
  • Cross-functional partner
Q03
マトリクス必須

Based on your experience working with this person in the last few months, how often do they do each of the following?

5行 × 4列
  • Communicates clearly and proactively
  • Follows through on commitments and deadlines
  • Collaborates well across teams or functions
  • Responds constructively when given feedback
  • Takes initiative on problems outside their core role
列: Rarely · Sometimes · Usually · Almost always
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to want to work with this person again on a future project?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

From this list, which trait is most and least representative of this person?

  • Clear communication
  • Reliability
  • Technical expertise
  • Collaboration
  • Problem-solving
  • Mentorship
  • Adaptability
  • Initiative
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most representative最も悪い:Least representative
Q06
選択式必須

If this person focused on developing one area, which would have the biggest impact on their effectiveness?

  • Clearer or more frequent communication
  • Following through more consistently
  • Collaborating earlier with other teams
  • Taking more initiative
  • Deeper technical skill
  • Mentoring or supporting others more
Q07
AIインタビュー必須

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent situation where they worked with this person, focusing on what the person did well and what got in the way if anything. If the respondent flagged a growth area above, probe for a concrete example of that gap and what a better version of that moment would have looked like. Avoid letting the answer stay abstract — anchor on one real event, not a general impression.

Q08
自由回答（長文）

Anything else about this person's impact on the team you'd like to add?

Q09
選択式

Which best describes your own role level? (Optional, used only to see if feedback patterns differ by seniority.)

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Senior leader
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
メッセージ

Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. Your ratings and comments will be summarized alongside other feedback for this person to support their development conversation.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines structured rating questions (matrix of collaboration/reliability/communication habits, opinion scale, best-worst ranking of strengths) with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through one specific, recent example behind their ratings.
  • Turns generic scores into evidence: the AI interview probes for a concrete situation, so reports include real examples rather than just numbers.
  • Includes role-level context (optional) so feedback patterns can be checked against seniority, plus a closing message setting expectations that responses will be summarized for the colleague.
  • Auto-generates a report from the combined rating and interview data, removing manual write-up work for whoever compiles peer feedback.

Jotform

Peer Feedback Forms

A template gallery page offering multiple static peer feedback form layouts that can be customized with Jotform's form builder. Good for quick deployment and integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a fixed-question form rather than an interview-style survey. No mention of follow-up probing or automated scoring of open responses.

優れている点

  • Multiple ready-made form layouts to choose from
  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Can embed in existing workflows/integrations Jotform supports

物足りない点

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questions to get at specifics behind a rating
  • No automated quality scoring of open-text responses
  • No published methodology for how questions were designed or validated

SurveyMonkey

Workplace Peer Feedback Template

A single ready-to-use peer feedback survey template built for SurveyMonkey's platform, with standard rating and open-text questions. It benefits from SurveyMonkey's reporting dashboards and distribution tools, but the question set is fixed at send-time with no dynamic branching based on individual answers. There's no voice-based or interview component.

優れている点

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analytics tools
  • Simple, familiar rating-scale question format for respondents
  • Quick to launch as a fielding-ready template

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into specific examples behind ratings
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended answers

Typeform

Peer Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready form template using Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UI, which makes it feel more personal than a typical grid form. It still relies on pre-set questions rather than any AI-driven follow-up, and reporting is limited to Typeform's standard results summaries.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Fielding-ready template that's quick to publish
  • Good completion-friendly design for shorter feedback forms

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to probe for concrete examples
  • No automated quality scoring of responses
  • No transparent, published prompt/methodology behind question design

よくあるご質問

「Peer Feedback and Working Relationship Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が10問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to give feedback on a colleague. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymiz…」・「What is your working relationship with this person? (Template note: pair this survey with a single named colleague per s…」・「Based on your experience working with this person in the last few months, how often do they do each of the following?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、10問を約6分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey

Captures direct reports' candid ratings of their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and follow-through, plus a best-worst trade-off on which leadership qualities most need development. The AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete story behind the lowest-rated behavior instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

360 Peer Evaluation & Working Relationship Survey

A structured peer-review template for 360-degree feedback cycles — covering core collaboration competencies, an overall effectiveness rating, and a best-worst prioritization of development areas — plus an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the concrete incident behind the rating so feedback isn't just a number. Built for HR, people ops, and team leads running peer review cycles.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Group Project Peer Evaluation Survey

Captures how students rate a teammate's contribution, communication, reliability, and work quality on a shared project, plus how they'd split credit across the team. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific behavior behind the rating instead of settling for a vague number, giving instructors evidence to catch free-riders and recognize strong collaborators.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Presentation Peer Feedback and Skill-Building Survey

Gathers structured, behavior-specific feedback from colleagues who watched a presentation — covering clarity, delivery, visuals, pacing, and Q&A — plus a trade-off ranking of what most needs work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that stood out, turning vague 'good job' feedback into a concrete example the presenter can act on.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review

Gathers structured multi-rater feedback—from managers, peers, direct reports, and self—on an employee's core competencies and overall effectiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete behavioral examples behind the ratings, turning vague impressions into specific, actionable evidence for development conversations.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Supervisor Performance Evaluation Survey

Measures how employees experience their direct supervisor's communication, fairness, support, and recognition. Built for HR teams and people managers running upward-feedback or 360 cycles. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind the overall effectiveness score, surfacing concrete behaviors instead of generic ratings.

テンプレートを見る