Manager Effectiveness & Upward Feedback Survey
Captures how direct reports experience their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and support — with a rating battery, a prioritization exercise on where to improve, and an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their satisfaction score. Built for HR teams and leaders running 360 or upward-feedback cycles.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
How much do you agree with each statement about your manager?
- Communicates expectations clearly
- Provides constructive feedback
- Recognizes my contributions
- Supports my professional growth
- Makes fair and timely decisions
- ほか1件
How likely are you to recommend your manager's leadership style to a peer joining your team?
Overall, how satisfied are you with your manager?
In the last 3 months, how often has your manager given you feedback on your work?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Every week or more
If your manager focused on improving one of these, which would most improve your experience at work — and which would matter least?
- Clearer goal-setting
- More frequent feedback
- Recognizing achievements
- Supporting career growth
- Better delegation
- Fair conflict resolution
- Being more available
- Stronger technical or domain guidance
Anchor on the respondent's satisfaction score and recommendation likelihood: ask them to describe a specific recent interaction with their manager that best explains that rating. If the score was low, probe what happened, what they wished the manager had done differently, and whether it's a one-off or a pattern. If the score was high, probe what specifically the manager does that works well so it can be reinforced or shared with other leaders. Avoid letting them stay abstract — push for a concrete example.
Is there anything else about your experience working with this manager that you'd like HR or the manager to know?
How long have you been working under this manager?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-2 years
- More than 2 years
- Prefer not to say
Which department or team do you work in? (Template note: replace with your own department list before launching.)
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your candid feedback! Your answers will be combined with your team's responses to identify patterns and coach managers — individual comments are never shared with your manager verbatim.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Combines a structured agreement matrix and satisfaction rating with a max-diff prioritization exercise, so HR gets both scored data and a clear signal on what to fix first.
- An AI follow-up interview anchors on each respondent's specific satisfaction score and recommendation likelihood, probing for the concrete moment behind the number instead of leaving it as a flat rating.
- Includes an open-ended catch-all question plus tenure and department fields, so reports can be segmented and read alongside qualitative context.
- Built specifically for upward-feedback/360 cycles run by HR teams and leaders, with transparent prompts and automated reporting rather than a manual write-up of open comments.
Jotform
Annual Manager Self-Evaluation Form TemplateThis is a manager self-evaluation form, filled out by the manager about their own performance, not an upward-feedback survey from direct reports — a meaningfully different audience than what this template targets. It's a fielding-ready static form on Jotform's builder, useful for annual self-review cycles rather than 360/upward feedback. Worth including only as a reference point for the adjacent self-eval use case.
優れている点
- Ready-to-use form builder with drag-and-drop customization
- Fits annual self-review workflows out of the box
- Part of a broad forms ecosystem (payments, notifications, integrations)
物足りない点
- Captures self-assessment, not direct-report perception, so it doesn't answer the upward-feedback question this template is built for
- No adaptive follow-up questioning — answers are collected as submitted with no probing for specifics
- No built-in quality scoring or automated synthesis across the manager's team
QuestionPro
Manager Effectiveness Evaluation Survey TemplateA directly comparable, fielding-ready manager effectiveness template on a mainstream survey platform, likely covering communication, feedback, and support dimensions similar to this template's matrix. It relies on standard closed- and open-ended question types without adaptive interviewing. Good for benchmarking question coverage but not for uncovering the story behind a given score.
優れている点
- Established survey platform with logic, piping, and reporting dashboards
- Template pre-built specifically around manager effectiveness rather than generic feedback
- Supports typical 360-style distribution and analytics
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific low or high score — respondents answer static items only
- No published prompt-level methodology, so how any qualitative analysis is done isn't transparent
- No voice-based interview option for respondents who prefer speaking over typing
SurveyMonkey
40+ Manager Feedback Questions (+ Editable Survey Template)This page is largely a question-bank/guide listing 40+ candidate questions, with an editable template attached rather than a single ready-to-field instrument — useful for inspiration but requiring assembly work before launch. It covers similar themes (communication, recognition, support) as a checklist. It doesn't include any dynamic follow-up mechanism.
優れている点
- Large question library to draw from when building a custom survey
- Backed by a well-known survey platform with strong distribution and analysis tools
- Editable template lowers the barrier to getting something fielded quickly
物足りない点
- Primarily a question guide, not a single pre-configured fielding-ready survey — teams must pick and assemble questions themselves
- No adaptive AI interviewing or voice interview option to explore individual responses in depth
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated synthesis report
SurveySparrow
30+ Manager Feedback Survey Questions With Customizable TemplateSimilar to SurveyMonkey's offering, this is presented as a question list/guide (30+ questions) with a customizable template attached, rather than a single finished survey ready to deploy. It shares thematic overlap — feedback, communication, support — with this template's rating battery. No mention of adaptive or voice-based interviewing.
優れている点
- Sizable question bank covering multiple facets of manager feedback
- Customizable template can be adapted to different team structures
- Platform supports conversational-style survey chat UI for higher completion
物足りない点
- Framed as a guide/question list rather than a single ready-to-field survey instrument
- No adaptive AI follow-up that probes the specific reason behind a satisfaction or recommendation score
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses
よくあるご質問
「Manager Effectiveness & Upward Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback about your manager. Your responses help them grow and help us s…」・「How much do you agree with each statement about your manager?」・「How likely are you to recommend your manager's leadership style to a peer joining your team?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。