QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Academic Advising Session Satisfaction Survey

Measures student satisfaction, perceived quality, and outcomes after academic advising sessions. Designed for institutional advising offices seeking actionable feedback to improve service delivery.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全21問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback on academic advising. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes. Your responses are completely confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve advising services. Participation is voluntary, there are no right or wrong answers, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
選択式

When was your most recent academic advising interaction?

  • Within the last 2 weeks
  • 2–4 weeks ago
  • 1–3 months ago
  • 3–6 months ago
  • More than 6 months ago
  • I have not met with an academic advisor
Q03
プルダウン

How many advising sessions have you had this academic term?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5 or more
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How clearly did your advisor explain your academic options and next steps?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clearly最大:Extremely clearly
Q05
選択式

Which of the following outcomes did you leave your advising interaction with? Select all that apply.

  • A plan for next term's courses
  • An updated degree audit or plan
  • Referrals to campus resources
  • Financial aid or policy guidance
  • Steps for academic improvement
  • Career or internship advice
  • None of the above
Q06
AIインタビュー

We'd like to understand your advising experience in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about what worked well and what could be improved.

Q07
選択式

What is your current student status?

  • Undergraduate—first year
  • Undergraduate—second year
  • Undergraduate—third year
  • Undergraduate—fourth year or more
  • Graduate—master's
  • Graduate—doctoral
  • Professional/other graduate
  • Non-degree/continuing education
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey! Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve academic advising services at your institution.

Q09
選択式

How did your most recent advising interaction take place?

  • In person
  • Video call
  • Phone
  • Email or chat
  • Group workshop
Q10
オピニオンスケール

How knowledgeable was your advisor about your degree requirements and academic policies?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all knowledgeable最大:Extremely knowledgeable
Q11
自由回答（長文）

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about your academic advising experience.

Q12
プルダウン

Which best describes your primary field of study?

  • Arts and humanities
  • Business
  • Education
  • Engineering
  • Health professions
  • Natural sciences
  • Social sciences
  • Computer and information sciences
  • Law or public policy
  • Undeclared
  • Other (please specify)
Q13
プルダウン

How long did you wait between booking and your advising session?

  • Less than 1 day
  • 1–3 days
  • 4–7 days
  • 8–14 days
  • More than 2 weeks
  • I did not need to book (walk-in)
Q14
オピニオンスケール

How well did your advisor listen to and address your individual concerns?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q15
選択式

What is your enrollment status this term?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with your most recent advising experience?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all satisfied最大:Extremely satisfied
Q17
選択式

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18–20
  • 21–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend your advisor to another student?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q19
選択式

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
プルダウン

Where is your institution located?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
選択式

Are you a first-generation college student? (Neither parent/guardian has a bachelor's degree.)

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes five distinct opinion-scale ratings (clarity of options explained, advisor knowledge of degree requirements, listening/responsiveness, overall satisfaction, and likelihood to recommend) for granular, benchmarkable service-quality data rather than a single satisfaction score.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper into a student's advising experience in their own words, going beyond a static open-text box.
  • Captures session logistics and context (mode of interaction, wait time between booking and session, sessions taken this term, outcomes achieved) alongside demographic and equity-relevant fields like first-generation status and field of study, enabling segmentation advising offices actually need.
  • Pairs an open-text reflection question with automated, transparent-prompt AI reporting so advising offices get a synthesized summary instead of raw unstructured comments to read manually.

Jotform

Academic Advising Form Template

This is a fielding-ready, customizable form template built for capturing academic advising information via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder. It's the most directly comparable of the reviewed pages since it targets the same academic advising context, though it appears structured more as a general intake/feedback form than a dedicated satisfaction-and-outcomes research instrument. No AI-driven follow-up or automated response scoring is indicated.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for the academic advising use case, unlike generic service-satisfaction templates
  • No-code drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder, easy to adapt field labels and layout
  • Backed by Jotform's broad template library and integrations ecosystem

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview option — questions are static and identical for every respondent
  • No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended answers
  • No indication of transparent, publishable AI prompt methodology since the product is a form builder, not an AI-interview platform

よくあるご質問

「Academic Advising Session Satisfaction Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome! Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback on academic advising. This survey takes approximately 10 m…」・「When was your most recent academic advising interaction?」・「How many advising sessions have you had this academic term?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Remote & Hybrid Work Experience Survey: Productivity, Well-being & Engagement

Measures employee perceptions of productivity, well-being, collaboration, and engagement across remote, hybrid, and in-office arrangements. Use this instrument to identify burnout risk factors and inform flexible-work policy decisions.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Undergraduate Student Experience & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how undergraduates rate advising, coursework, facilities, wellness support, and belonging, plus overall satisfaction and improvement priorities. Built for provosts, deans of students, and institutional research teams. The AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing specific moments and unmet needs that ratings alone miss.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

University Student Satisfaction & Experience Survey

Tracks how satisfied students are with teaching, advising, facilities, and campus life, and pinpoints which improvements matter most using a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or experience behind each student's satisfaction score, surfacing detail closed questions miss.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Financial Advisor Client Satisfaction Survey

Measures how clients experience their financial advisor relationship — communication cadence, clarity of the financial plan, understanding of fees, and confidence in the guidance received. An AI follow-up digs into the reasoning behind confidence scores so advisory firms can see exactly what builds or erodes trust, not just a number.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Student Satisfaction & Course Experience Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with teaching quality, course content, workload, support services, and campus facilities, and pinpoints which areas most urgently need improvement — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific class or interaction behind their overall satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る