QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Education & Academic

Adjunct Faculty Experience & Compensation Survey

Measures adjunct and part-time instructor satisfaction across pay equity, institutional support, teaching resources, and scheduling predictability. Designed for higher education administrators seeking actionable data to improve adjunct working conditions.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全26問・約11分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Adjunct Faculty Experience Survey. This survey is designed to understand the experiences of adjunct and part-time instructors in higher education. Your responses will help inform improvements to pay, support, resources, and working conditions. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. The survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete.

Q02
選択式

Which of the following best describes your current teaching appointment?

  • Adjunct or part-time instructor
  • Full-time non-tenure track
  • Tenure-track or tenured
  • Graduate TA/Instructor
  • Multiple roles (including adjunct)
  • Other
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with your adjunct or part-time teaching experience this term?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How responsive has your department or program been to your questions or requests this term?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all responsive最大:Extremely responsive
Q05
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the fairness of your compensation relative to your workload this term?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with the technology and learning management system (LMS) available for your courses?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q07
ランク付け

Please rank the following areas from most to least in need of improvement for adjunct instructors at your institution.

  1. Compensation and benefits
  2. Course scheduling predictability
  3. Communication from department
  4. Access to teaching resources
  5. Recognition and respect
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q08
選択式

What type of institution are you teaching at this term?

  • Public 2-year (community/technical college)
  • Public 4-year university
  • Private nonprofit
  • Private for-profit
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used to inform improvements for adjunct and part-time instructors at your institution. We appreciate your time and honest feedback.

Q10
プルダウン

How many courses are you teaching this term?

  • 0 (not currently teaching)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5 or more
Q11
オピニオンスケール

At the start of this term, how prepared did you feel to teach your assigned course(s)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all prepared最大:Very well prepared
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with the onboarding or orientation support you received for your current course(s)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with your per-course pay rate?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q14
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with the course materials and curriculum support provided to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q15
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses throughout this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your experience as an adjunct instructor? Please share your thoughts and the moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions.

Q16
プルダウン

How long have you taught in an adjunct or part-time capacity in total?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • 11–15 years
  • 16–20 years
  • More than 20 years
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with access to mentoring or peer support from other faculty?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with your access to benefits (e.g., health insurance, retirement)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q19
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with your physical workspace or classroom facilities?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q20
選択式

What is your primary broad discipline area?

  • STEM
  • Social sciences
  • Humanities
  • Arts
  • Business
  • Health professions
  • Education
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with opportunities for professional development available to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q22
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with the predictability and timeliness of your pay?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q23
プルダウン

Typically, how far in advance are you notified of a new course assignment?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 1–2 months
  • More than 2 months
  • Not applicable
Q24
選択式

In which region is your institution located?

  • Northeast (U.S.)
  • Midwest (U.S.)
  • South (U.S.)
  • West (U.S.)
  • Outside the U.S.
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
選択式

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
選択式

What is your age range?

  • Under 25
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on pay equity, benefits, and pay predictability with an AI follow-up interview that asks each respondent to identify their single most important improvement area, generating richer qualitative context than fixed-choice forms alone
  • Covers the full adjunct experience lifecycle in one instrument — onboarding, mentoring, professional development, scheduling notice, LMS/tech support, and classroom facilities — rather than a generic faculty satisfaction snapshot
  • Includes a ranking question forcing respondents to prioritize improvement areas (pay, support, resources, scheduling), giving administrators a clear action hierarchy instead of just averages
  • Segments results by institution type, discipline, region, appointment length, and demographics, enabling equity-focused subgroup analysis specific to adjunct/part-time status

QuestionPro

University Faculty Satisfaction Survey

A general faculty satisfaction template covering broad workplace topics like workload and campus climate, not adjunct-specific pay equity or scheduling predictability. It's a static, ready-to-field questionnaire rather than an adaptive interview tool. Useful as a generic starting point but requires heavy customization for adjunct/part-time-specific compensation issues.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with a ready-made faculty satisfaction template
  • Covers general faculty experience topics applicable across institution types
  • Likely offers standard survey logic and reporting dashboards

物足りない点

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
  • No adjunct-specific focus on per-course pay, benefits access, or assignment notice timing
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated qualitative scoring of open responses

SurveyMonkey

University Faculty Satisfaction Survey Questions

SurveyMonkey's faculty satisfaction template targets general faculty sentiment rather than the specific pay-equity and scheduling concerns unique to adjunct and part-time instructors. It's a static question bank designed for broad customization, not a purpose-built adjunct compensation instrument. Reporting is standard dashboard analytics rather than narrative, interview-based insight.

優れている点

  • Widely used platform with strong survey distribution and basic analytics tools
  • Faculty-focused template saves time versus building from scratch
  • Simple to customize question wording for different institution types

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up to probe pay equity or workload concerns
  • Not tailored to adjunct-specific issues like per-course pay or last-minute scheduling
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

よくあるご質問

「Adjunct Faculty Experience & Compensation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が26問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to the Adjunct Faculty Experience Survey. This survey is designed to understand the experiences of adjunct and…」・「Which of the following best describes your current teaching appointment?」・「Overall, how satisfied are you with your adjunct or part-time teaching experience this term?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、26問を約11分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Education & Academic

Academic Integrity Climate Survey for Students

Measures student awareness of academic integrity policies, perceived peer norms around misconduct, and views on institutional interventions. Designed for education administrators and researchers seeking actionable data to strengthen integrity culture.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

University Faculty Satisfaction & Retention Survey

Measures how satisfied faculty are with compensation, workload, research support, governance, and career advancement, plus how many are seriously considering leaving. Built for provosts, deans, and faculty affairs offices; the AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind low scores or leaving intentions rather than just the numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Professor Teaching Effectiveness Evaluation Survey

Measures how students experience a professor's teaching across clarity, engagement, feedback, availability, and fairness, plus overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend. Built for academic departments and course coordinators running end-of-term reviews, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment or assignment that most shaped a student's rating.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Teaching Assistant Effectiveness Evaluation Survey

Gathers student feedback on a teaching assistant's clarity, responsiveness, fairness, and classroom presence across lectures, labs, or office hours. Includes a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in a TA and an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall rating, surfacing concrete strengths and fixable gaps departments can act on.

テンプレートを見る
Education & Academic

Employee Salary & Compensation Fairness Survey

Measures how employees feel about their pay, benefits, and the process behind raises — covering satisfaction, market comparison, and priority trade-offs between compensation elements. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind fairness or satisfaction scores, especially where perceptions of pay and market value diverge.

テンプレートを見る