Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Teaching Assistant Effectiveness Evaluation Survey
Gathers student feedback on a teaching assistant's clarity, responsiveness, fairness, and classroom presence across lectures, labs, or office hours. Includes a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in a TA and an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall rating, surfacing concrete strengths and fixable gaps departments can act on.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全11問・約6分
Q02
選択式必須
In what setting did you most often interact with this TA?
- Discussion or recitation section
- Lab session
- Office hours only
- Grading/feedback only, no in-person contact
- A mix of several of these
Q03
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about this TA?
6行 × 5列
- Explains concepts in a way that's easy to understand
- Responds to questions (in person or by email) in a reasonable amount of time
- Gives feedback on assignments that helps me improve
- Creates a respectful, welcoming environment for questions
- Is well-prepared for sections, labs, or office hours
- ほか1件
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
数値必須
In the last month, how many times did you attend this TA's office hours or a session they led outside of required class time?
Q05
評価スケール必須
How would you rate the clarity and usefulness of the written or verbal feedback this TA gives on your work?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not useful at all最大:Extremely useful
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
Of the qualities below, which matters most to you in a teaching assistant, and which matters least?
- Deep knowledge of the course material
- Clear, organized explanations
- Fast, reliable responses to questions
- Fairness and consistency in grading
- Approachability and patience
- Enthusiasm for the subject
- Availability outside of scheduled hours
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how effective has this TA been in supporting your learning this term?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not effective at all最大:Extremely effective
Q08
AIインタビュー
Anchor on the respondent's overall effectiveness rating and ask them to describe one specific, recent moment with this TA (a session, an email exchange, a graded assignment) that shaped that score. If the rating was low, probe what the TA could have done differently in that moment; if high, probe what specifically made it work so the department can reinforce that behavior. If the respondent gives a vague or purely abstract answer, ask for a concrete example before moving on.
Q09
自由回答（長文）
Is there anything specific you'd suggest to help this TA improve, or anything you want the department to know?
Q10
選択式
What is your current class standing?
- First-year
- Second-year
- Third-year
- Fourth-year or beyond
- Graduate student
- Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you for your feedback! Your responses will be combined with others and shared with the department to help recognize strong TAs and target support where it's needed.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that anchors on each student's overall effectiveness rating and digs into the specific moment behind it, surfacing concrete strengths and fixable gaps
- Combines structured measurement (matrix agreement statements, rating and opinion-scale questions) with a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off to identify what students value most in a TA
- Captures context often missed in static forms, such as setting of interaction (lecture, lab, office hours), frequency of office-hour attendance, and class standing, so departments can segment results
- Closes with an open-ended improvement question and an automated report, giving departments both quantitative scores and actionable qualitative detail per TA
SurveyMonkey
Teaching Assistant Evaluation: TA Survey ExamplesThis is a directly comparable, fielding-ready template covering TA evaluation from students, with example questions on clarity and support. It's a static questionnaire built for broad, quick deployment rather than adaptive probing, and it doesn't appear to include a trade-off exercise on what matters most in a TA. SurveyMonkey's strength here is ease of setup and its large template library for academic use cases.
優れている点
- Well-established, easy-to-launch template built specifically for TA evaluation
- Backed by a large, familiar survey platform with broad institutional adoption
- Likely includes standard rating-style questions covering common TA evaluation criteria
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind a rating
- No visible best-worst/trade-off mechanism to reveal which TA qualities matter most to students
- No published methodology on how questions were designed or scored, unlike QuestionPunk's transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Teaching Assistant Effectiveness Evaluation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your experience with your teaching assistant this term. Your honest feedba…」・「In what setting did you most often interact with this TA?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about this TA?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。