Aircraft Maintenance Documentation Usability Assessment
Collects structured technician feedback on the clarity, accuracy, accessibility, and timeliness of aerospace maintenance documentation to drive safety and efficiency improvements.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In the last 30 days, how often did you use maintenance documentation?
- Multiple times per day
- About once per day
- A few times per week
- About once per week
- Less than weekly
- Not in the last 30 days
Thinking about the documentation you used most often in the last 30 days, how would you rate its overall clarity of written instructions?
Please rank the following potential improvements from most helpful (top) to least helpful (bottom).
- Better search and filtering
- Clearer figures / step graphics
- More cross-references and hyperlinks
- Offline access with sync
- Standardized tables for specs / torque values
- Clear change logs and revision summaries
Please briefly describe the most recent documentation issue you encountered and how it affected your work, if applicable.
What is your primary role?
- Line maintenance technician
- Base / heavy maintenance technician
- Avionics specialist
- Inspector / quality
- Planner
- Engineer / tech services
- Supervisor / manager
- Other
Thank you for your time. Your input will directly inform improvements to maintenance documentation usability, clarity, and accessibility across the organization.
Which of the following documentation types did you use in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.
- Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM)
- Component Maintenance Manual (CMM)
- Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC)
- Service Bulletins / Airworthiness Directives (SB/AD)
- Work orders or task cards
- Wiring diagrams / schematics
- Troubleshooting guides
- Digital checklists or job aids
- Other (please specify)
How would you rate the accuracy of the technical content in the documentation you used most often?
Which format would you most prefer for future maintenance documentation?
- Structured web pages with hyperlinks
- Interactive app experience
- Downloadable PDFs
- Printed manuals
- Mixed: web plus printable extracts
Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your documentation experience in a bit more depth. What is the single biggest way that maintenance documentation could be improved to help you do your job more effectively?
How many years of experience do you have in aerospace maintenance?
- 0–1
- 2–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21+
What was your primary format for accessing documentation in the last 30 days?
- OEM web portal
- Internal MRO system
- Tablet / EFB app
- Static PDF files
- Printed copies
- Scans / photos of pages
- Other
How would you rate the completeness of the documentation (e.g., all steps, specs, and references included)?
Which certifications or licenses do you currently hold? Select all that apply.
- A&P
- EASA Part-66 B1
- EASA Part-66 B2
- IA / Authorized Inspector
- None
- Other (please specify)
Which tools do you use to access documentation? Select all that apply.
- Tablet / EFB
- Desktop / laptop
- Shop floor kiosk
- Personal mobile phone
- Shared binder shelf
- AR headset / smart glasses
- Other (please specify)
How would you rate the quality of diagrams, figures, and visual aids in the documentation?
What is your primary shift?
- Day
- Evening
- Night
- Rotating / varies
How easy or difficult was it to locate the correct document within your workflow in the last 30 days?
In which region do you primarily work?
- Americas
- Europe
- Middle East
- Africa
- Asia-Pacific
To what extent were documentation updates available in time to support your maintenance tasks in the last 30 days?
What type of organization do you primarily work for?
- Airline
- Independent MRO
- OEM
- Defense
- General aviation
- Other
Overall, how confident are you that the documented procedures you follow are accurate?
Overall, how confident are you that following the documented procedures keeps you and your colleagues safe?
In the last 30 days, approximately how many times did unclear or outdated documentation cause rework, delay, or a work stoppage?
- 0 times
- 1–2 times
- 3–5 times
- 6–10 times
- 11 or more times
In the last 30 days, approximately how many minutes per typical shift did you spend searching for or clarifying documentation?
- 0 minutes
- 1–5 minutes
- 6–15 minutes
- 16–30 minutes
- 31–60 minutes
- More than 60 minutes
If you reported a documentation error or issue in the last 30 days, how would you rate the speed of resolution?
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
よくあるご質問
「Aircraft Maintenance Documentation Usability Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が27問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Maintenance Documentation Usability Assessment. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes. Your response…」・「In the last 30 days, how often did you use maintenance documentation?」・「Thinking about the documentation you used most often in the last 30 days, how would you rate its overall clarity of writ…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、27問を約12分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。