QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Developer & Engineering

Developer Documentation Findability & Navigation UX Survey

Evaluates how easily developers can find, navigate, and understand technical documentation. Measures discoverability, search quality, information architecture fit, and terminology clarity to prioritize documentation UX improvements.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全22問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! This survey asks about your most recent experience using developer documentation (within the last 30 days). Your responses will help improve documentation findability, navigation, and clarity. This survey takes approximately 6–8 minutes. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.

Q02
選択式

Have you used any developer documentation in the last 30 days?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How easy was it to find the topic you needed?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q04
選択式

Did you use the site's search feature during your most recent session?

  • Yes
  • No
Q05
オピニオンスケール

How well did the page structure and content flow match the task you were trying to accomplish?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all well最大:Extremely well
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How clear and consistent was the terminology used in the documentation?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unclear and inconsistent最大:Very clear and consistent
Q07
自由回答（長文）

Was anything missing or hard to locate? Please describe the topic and where you expected to find it.

Q08
選択式

Which best describes your primary role?

  • Front-end developer
  • Back-end developer
  • Full-stack developer
  • Mobile developer
  • Data / ML practitioner
  • DevOps / SRE
  • Technical writer
  • Product manager
  • Other
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time — your feedback directly helps improve developer documentation!

Q10
選択式

How often do you use developer documentation?

  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • Weekly
  • Monthly
  • Less often
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How much effort did it take to find the information you needed?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very little effort最大:A great deal of effort
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How relevant were the search results to what you were looking for?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all relevant最大:Extremely relevant
Q13
オピニオンスケール

After reading the documentation, how confident were you that you could complete your task?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Completely confident
Q14
自由回答（長文）

Please list any terms, acronyms, or parameter names that were unclear or confusing. Include examples if possible.

Q15
AIインタビュー

Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your documentation experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.

Q16
選択式

How many years of professional coding or technical experience do you have?

  • 0–1
  • 2–4
  • 5–9
  • 10+
Q17
自由回答（長文）

Which documentation site or product did you use most recently?

Q18
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate the overall navigation structure of the documentation you used?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q19
ランク付け

Rank the following navigation aids by how much they help you find information (most helpful first).

  1. Search
  2. Table of contents
  3. Left-hand sidebar
  4. On-page headings
  5. Related links
  6. Site-wide navigation
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q20
選択式

What is the primary programming language you used with this documentation?

  • JavaScript / TypeScript
  • Python
  • Java
  • C# / .NET
  • Go
  • C / C++
  • Ruby
  • PHP
  • Swift / Kotlin
  • Other
Q21
選択式

What is the size of your organization?

  • Just me
  • 2–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–250
  • 251–1,000
  • 1,001+
Q22
プルダウン

In which region are you located?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia
  • South America
  • Africa
  • Oceania
  • Middle East

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that adapts to each respondent's earlier answers about their documentation experience, going beyond fixed-choice questions
  • Combines quantitative UX metrics (findability, search relevance, navigation structure, terminology clarity) with open-text follow-ups on unclear terms and missing content
  • Uses a ranking exercise to prioritize which navigation aids (e.g., search, sidebar, breadcrumbs) actually help users, giving direct input for IA decisions
  • Captures role, experience level, primary language, and org size as segmentation variables so findability issues can be analyzed by developer persona

QuestionPro

Technical Documentation Survey Template

This is a fielding-ready static survey template focused on technical documentation feedback, covering clarity and usefulness at a general level. It's a reasonable starting point for basic satisfaction tracking but doesn't appear structured around specific UX dimensions like search quality or information architecture fit. As with most QuestionPro templates, it is built for standard multiple-choice/rating question flows rather than conversational depth.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use template within an established survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Backed by QuestionPro's reporting and analytics dashboard
  • Likely customizable within their survey builder for teams already on that platform

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents get the same fixed question set regardless of their answers
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option to observe actual navigation/search behavior
  • No published methodology on how questions were validated or scored, unlike a platform with transparent, per-response quality scoring

よくあるご質問

「Developer Documentation Findability & Navigation UX Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が22問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome! This survey asks about your most recent experience using developer documentation (within the last 30 days). You…」・「Have you used any developer documentation in the last 30 days?」・「How easy was it to find the topic you needed?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、22問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Developer & Engineering

Developer Toolchain & Setup Experience Survey

Measures project setup friction, tooling usability, and productivity flow for software developers. Use to identify onboarding bottlenecks, prioritize tool investments, and benchmark developer experience.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Documentation Experience & Findability Assessment

Evaluates documentation completeness, example quality, and information findability from the user's perspective. Designed for product and developer-experience teams seeking prioritized, actionable improvement signals.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Developer Documentation Experience Assessment

Measures documentation usability, findability, content clarity, and code accuracy based on a developer's recent session. Designed for DX and documentation teams seeking actionable feedback to prioritize improvements.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Technical Documentation Usability & Effectiveness Survey

Evaluates whether developers, engineers, and other technical users can actually find answers, understand concepts, and finish tasks using your documentation — not just whether they like it. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the last real incident where the docs helped or failed them, surfacing specifics a satisfaction score alone would miss.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Content Findability & Search UX Assessment

Measures content findability, search satisfaction, navigation confidence, and filter effectiveness for recent site or app visitors. Designed for UX and information architecture teams seeking actionable data on how users locate and evaluate content.

テンプレートを見る
Developer & Engineering

Website Navigation Findability Tree Test

Measures how intuitively users locate key tasks within a website's information architecture. Use this to validate navigation labels, identify findability gaps, and prioritize structural improvements.

テンプレートを見る