すべてのテンプレート
Strategy & Transformation

Annual Planning Priorities, Risks, and Bold Bets Survey

Collects input from every level of the organization on top priorities, resourcing tradeoffs, biggest risks, and the bold bets people would make for next year. An AI follow-up presses into the reasoning, blockers, and resources behind each person's proposed bet, so planning starts with real signal instead of guesses.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for weighing in on next year's plan. Your priorities, concerns, and ideas genuinely shape what leadership decides to fund. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 6-8 minutes.

Q02
ランク付け必須

Rank these potential company priorities for next year from most to least important, in your view.

  1. (Replace with Priority A - e.g., Expand into new markets)
  2. (Replace with Priority B - e.g., Improve product reliability)
  3. (Replace with Priority C - e.g., Grow enterprise sales)
  4. (Replace with Priority D - e.g., Invest in AI capabilities)
  5. (Replace with Priority E - e.g., Strengthen operational efficiency) (Template note: swap in your own draft priorities before launching.)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q03
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

From this list of potential bets for next year, which would create the most value for the business, and which the least?

  • (Replace with new product/feature bet)
  • (Replace with new market or segment bet)
  • Invest heavily in AI or automation tooling
  • Increase headcount in customer-facing teams
  • Sunset or consolidate an underperforming product line
  • (Replace with a key partnership or channel bet)
  • Redesign the core product experience
  • Build out data and analytics infrastructure
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Highest-value bet最も悪い:Lowest-value bet
Q04
ポイント配分必須

If you had 100 points to allocate across these areas for next year's investment, how would you split them?

  • Product development
  • Sales & marketing
  • Customer support/success
  • Operations & infrastructure
  • People, culture & hiring
  • Research & innovation
100ポイントを配分
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

Right now, how confident are you that your team has what it needs to hit an ambitious goal next year?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q06
マトリクス必須

For each area, how much of a risk do you see for the business over the next 12 months?

6行 × 4列
  • Talent and retention risk
  • Competitive risk
  • Macroeconomic/market risk
  • Technology or security risk
  • Execution and operational risk
  • ほか1件
列: Low risk · Moderate risk · High risk · Severe risk
Q07
選択式必須

What is the single biggest constraint limiting your team's ability to execute well next year?

  • Headcount or staffing
  • Budget
  • Tooling or technology
  • Cross-team dependencies or support
  • Unclear priorities or leadership direction
Q08
自由回答(長文)

If you could make one bold bet for the organization next year — something bigger than business as usual — what would it be and why?

Q09
AIインタビュー

Dig into the respondent's bold bet: what would concretely change day-to-day, what resources, budget, or permission it would require, and what has stopped the organization from doing it already. If they flagged any risk area as 'Severe', ask what a leading indicator of that risk showing up would look like and what mitigation they'd prioritize first. If their bold bet was vague, push for a specific first step someone could take within 90 days.

Q10
メッセージ

Almost done — just a couple of quick optional questions about your role, so we can see how priorities differ across the organization.

Q11
選択式

Which area of the business do you primarily work in?

  • Product
  • Engineering
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer success/support
  • Operations
  • People/HR
  • Finance
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which best describes your level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Director/senior manager
  • VP/executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for the input! Your priorities, risk read, and bold bet feed directly into the planning discussion — leadership will see aggregated results before final decisions are made.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Pairs a open-text bold-bet prompt with a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that digs into what would concretely change day-to-day, blockers, and resources needed — turning a one-line idea into real signal instead of a guess.
  • Uses ranking, best-worst trade-off, and point-allocation (100-point allocation) together so leadership gets forced trade-offs on priorities and investment, not just unranked opinions.
  • Includes a matrix question rating risk across multiple business areas over the next 12 months plus a multiple-choice constraint question, giving a structured risk-and-blocker map alongside the qualitative bets.
  • Closes with optional role/level segmentation (area of business, level) so priorities, risk reads, and bold bets can be cut by who is saying them, without forcing identification up front.

Jotform

Capacity Planning Checklist Form Template

This is a static checklist form focused narrowly on tracking capacity/resource items, not a survey designed to collect organization-wide input on strategic priorities, risks, and bold bets. It's fielding-ready as a form but scoped to operational capacity tracking rather than annual planning strategy. Useful for ops teams doing resource checklists, but not a direct substitute for a cross-level planning-input survey.

優れている点

  • Quick to deploy using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Simple, structured checklist format that's easy for respondents to complete fast
  • Backed by Jotform's broad template library and integrations

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — it's a fixed checklist, so there's no way to probe reasoning, blockers, or resourcing behind any answer
  • No prioritization methodology like ranking, max-diff, or constant-sum allocation for trading off competing priorities
  • No cross-level role/level segmentation or automated per-response quality scoring, and no publicly stated methodology behind the checklist's structure

よくあるご質問

「Annual Planning Priorities, Risks, and Bold Bets Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for weighing in on next year's plan. Your priorities, concerns, and ideas genuinely shape what leadership decides…」・「Rank these potential company priorities for next year from most to least important, in your view.」・「From this list of potential bets for next year, which would create the most value for the business, and which the least?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る