すべてのテンプレート
Sample Templates

API Rate Limit Fairness & Productivity Impact Survey

Measures developer perceptions of API rate-limit fairness, documentation clarity, productivity impact, and coping strategies. Designed for API product teams and developer-experience researchers seeking actionable data to improve throttling policies and pricing tiers.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全20問・約9分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to this survey on your experience with API rate limits. This survey takes approximately 7–9 minutes. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. All responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. By continuing, you agree to participate.

Q02
選択式

Which types of APIs have you integrated in the past 6 months? (Select all that apply.)

  • Public REST/HTTP APIs
  • GraphQL APIs
  • gRPC services
  • WebSocket/streaming APIs
  • Cloud provider APIs
  • Third-party SaaS APIs
  • Internal microservice APIs
  • SDK-only integrations
  • Other
Q03
プルダウン

In the past 3 months, how often did you hit a rate limit on any API you use?

  • Never
  • Once
  • 2–3 times
  • About monthly
  • About weekly
  • Several times per week
  • Daily or more
Q04
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how fair were the rate limits you encountered in the past 3 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q05
オピニオンスケール

To what extent did rate limits slow down your development work in the past 3 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all最大:To a great extent
Q06
ランク付け

Please rank the following factors by how much they would improve your perception of rate-limit fairness (drag the most important to the top).

  1. Clear documentation
  2. Transparent tiers and upgrade paths
  3. Predictable and consistent enforcement
  4. Helpful error messages and headers
  5. Representative sandbox limits
  6. Flexible burst handling or grace periods
  7. Responsive limit-increase process
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
自由回答(長文)

Briefly describe a recent incident where rate limits affected your workflow or customers. What changed afterward?

Q08
プルダウン

Which role best describes your current position?

  • Backend developer
  • Full-stack developer
  • Frontend developer
  • Mobile developer
  • Data/ML engineer
  • SRE/DevOps
  • Product manager
  • Founder/CTO
  • Other
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses are anonymous and will be used in aggregate to help API providers improve rate-limit policies and developer experience.

Q10
選択式

Which rate-limit mechanisms have you encountered recently? (Select all that apply.)

  • Fixed requests per minute/hour
  • Burst plus sustained (token bucket)
  • Leaky bucket
  • Concurrency caps (simultaneous requests)
  • Daily or monthly quotas
  • Cost/compute unit budgets
  • IP-based limits
  • User or org-based limits
  • Adaptive/dynamic throttling
  • Not sure / Other
Q11
オピニオンスケール

The rate-limit documentation I encountered was clear and easy to understand.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How severe was the most significant rate-limit incident you experienced in the past 3 months in terms of its downstream impact (e.g., on end users or business outcomes)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all severe最大:Extremely severe
Q13
プルダウン

What price increase would you consider acceptable for approximately 2× higher rate limits on a critical API?

  • 0% — I wouldn't pay more
  • 1–10%
  • 11–25%
  • 26–50%
  • 51–75%
  • 76–100%
  • More than 100%
Q14
AIインタビュー

Based on your survey responses, is there anything else you'd like to share about your experience with API rate limits — what works well, what frustrates you, or what you wish providers would change?

Q15
プルダウン

How many years have you worked professionally with APIs?

  • Less than 1
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11 or more
Q16
オピニオンスケール

When I hit a rate limit, the error messages and response headers gave me enough information to resolve the issue.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q17
選択式

When you hit a rate limit, which actions do you typically take? (Select all that apply.)

  • Exponential backoff/retry
  • Queue or defer requests
  • Batch or cache requests
  • Optimize code to reduce API calls
  • Request a higher tier or limit increase
  • Switch to an alternative provider
  • Use mirrors or proxies
  • Throttle or limit end-user features
  • Accept the limit / do nothing
  • Other
Q18
プルダウン

What is your company size (total employees)?

  • Just me
  • 2–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
Q19
オピニオンスケール

Rate limits were enforced predictably and consistently across my requests.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q20
プルダウン

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Other

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

よくあるご質問

「API Rate Limit Fairness & Productivity Impact Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が20問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to this survey on your experience with API rate limits. This survey takes approximately 7–9 minutes. Your parti…」・「Which types of APIs have you integrated in the past 6 months? (Select all that apply.)」・「In the past 3 months, how often did you hit a rate limit on any API you use?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、20問を約9分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る