すべてのテンプレート
Pricing & Packaging

Dynamic Pricing Fairness Perceptions Survey

Measures consumer attitudes toward dynamic and surge pricing across rideshare, delivery, travel, and retail, identifying key fairness drivers, transparency preferences, and acceptable price thresholds to inform pricing strategy.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全23問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this research study. This survey explores your perceptions of prices that change based on demand, time, or availability. It should take approximately 6–8 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential, will be anonymized, and reported only in aggregate for internal research purposes. By continuing, you indicate your consent to participate.

Q02
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with surge or dynamic pricing (i.e., prices that change based on demand, time, or availability)?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q03
メッセージ

Next, you will see several common situations involving dynamic pricing. Please rate how fair or unfair each one feels to you.

Q04
プルダウン

In an urgent situation, what is the maximum price increase you would accept for immediate availability?

  • No increase — I would not pay more
  • Up to 10% more
  • 11–25% more
  • 26–50% more
  • 51–75% more
  • 76–100% more (double the price)
  • More than double the price
Q05
ランク付け

Please rank the following factors from most to least important in determining whether dynamic pricing feels fair to you.

  1. Size of the price change
  2. Transparency or explanation provided
  3. Availability of a lower-cost alternative
  4. Presence of a cap or maximum price
  5. Whether workers are compensated more during surges
  6. Availability of advance notice before purchase
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q06
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts about what makes dynamic pricing feel fair or unfair to you. Our AI moderator may ask a follow-up question to better understand your perspective.

Q07
選択式

Which of the following services have you used in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Rideshare or taxi apps (e.g., Uber, Lyft)
  • Food delivery apps (e.g., DoorDash, Uber Eats)
  • Airline booking platforms
  • Hotel booking platforms
  • Event or sports ticketing platforms
  • Online retail or e-commerce sites
  • Utilities with time-of-use pricing
  • None of the above
Q08
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses have been recorded and will be used to improve our understanding of dynamic pricing perceptions. If you have any questions about this study, please contact the research team.

Q09
選択式

In the last 12 months, have you encountered prices that changed based on demand, time, or availability?

  • Yes, in the last 12 months
  • No, not in the last 12 months
  • Not sure
Q10
オピニオンスケール

A rideshare app doubles its prices during a heavy rainstorm at rush hour.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q11
選択式

Which of the following would make dynamic or surge pricing more acceptable to you? Select all that apply.

  • Clear advance notice before purchase
  • A visible cap on the markup or multiplier
  • Real-time explanation of the reason for the price change
  • Higher pay for workers tied to surge periods
  • Off-peak discounts to balance demand
  • Loyalty members shielded or partially protected from surges
  • An alternative fixed-price or slower option
  • Ability to pre-book at a fixed price
  • None of the above
Q12
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

Where did you most recently experience dynamic or surge pricing? If you have not experienced it, select 'Not applicable.'

  • Rideshare or taxi apps
  • Food delivery apps
  • Airline or hotel booking
  • Event or sports ticketing
  • Online retail or e-commerce
  • Utilities/energy (time-of-use rates)
  • Other
  • Not applicable
Q14
オピニオンスケール

A hotel raises its room rates by 50% during a popular holiday weekend.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q15
オピニオンスケール

To what extent does a company explaining how its dynamic pricing works in plain language affect how fair you perceive their pricing to be?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Makes it feel much less fair最大:Makes it feel much more fair
Q16
選択式

What is your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
オピニオンスケール

An online retailer changes the price of a product based on how many people are currently viewing it.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q18
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how much do you trust companies that use dynamic or surge pricing?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Do not trust at all最大:Trust completely
Q19
プルダウン

In which region do you currently live?

  • North America
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Europe
  • Middle East & North Africa
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
オピニオンスケール

An electricity provider charges higher rates during peak evening hours (6–9 PM) and lower rates overnight.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q21
選択式

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctoral or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
オピニオンスケール

A food delivery app adds a surcharge during a major sporting event when many people are ordering at once.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q23
選択式

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker or caregiver
  • Retired
  • Unemployed and looking for work
  • Not working and not looking for work
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes scenario-based opinion-scale ratings across five real-world dynamic pricing contexts (rideshare, hotel, retail, electricity, food delivery) to isolate fairness drivers by situation
  • Captures acceptable price-increase thresholds via a dedicated dropdown question and ranks the factors that make surge pricing feel fair through a structured ranking exercise
  • Ends with an AI follow-up interview that adapts to each respondent's prior answers, surfacing open-ended reasoning that fixed-choice questions alone would miss
  • Combines quantitative trust and transparency measures with demographic segmentation (age, region, education, employment) to support pricing-strategy segmentation without any academic-tier pricing gimmicks

Jotform

Pricing Estimation Survey Form Template

A static drag-and-drop form template focused on general price estimation rather than fairness perceptions of dynamic or surge pricing specifically. Useful as a customizable starting form, but it does not include scenario-based fairness testing or industry-specific pricing contexts. Best suited for teams wanting a quick, simple pricing questionnaire rather than in-depth attitudinal research.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop form builder familiar to non-researchers
  • Quick to customize for basic price-point questions
  • Part of a large template library for fast setup

物足りない点

  • Fixed-question format with no adaptive follow-up probing on responses
  • No built-in scenario testing across multiple pricing contexts like rideshare, travel, or retail
  • No transparent methodology or automated fairness-driver analysis

QuestionPro

Concept Evaluation and Pricing Study Survey Templates

A broader concept-evaluation and pricing study template aimed at testing product concepts and price points generally, not fairness perceptions of surge or dynamic pricing. It's a standard fielding-ready survey template rather than an interview-style research instrument. Good for early product-pricing validation but not built around demand-based pricing scenarios.

優れている点

  • Covers concept testing alongside pricing, useful for product-market fit work
  • Backed by an established survey research platform with reporting tools
  • Template structure supports standard quantitative pricing analysis

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interviewing or voice-based follow-up to explore reasoning behind price sensitivity
  • Not designed around surge/dynamic pricing scenarios or transparency preferences
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Product Pricing Survey Template

A conversational-style pricing survey focused on price sensitivity and market research for products generally, not dynamic or surge pricing fairness. It is a ready-to-field template with a chat-like UI, but questions are pre-scripted rather than adaptively generated. Works well for straightforward price-sensitivity studies but lacks situational fairness testing.

優れている点

  • Conversational survey format that may improve completion rates
  • Positioned specifically around price sensitivity, a related research goal
  • Fielding-ready template usable out of the box

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questions tailored to individual responses
  • No coverage of surge-pricing-specific scenarios (rideshare, delivery, travel) or acceptable-threshold measurement
  • No transparent, publishable AI prompt or scoring methodology

Typeform

Pricing Survey Template

A general-purpose pricing survey template with Typeform's signature single-question flow, intended for broad price-related feedback rather than dynamic pricing fairness research specifically. It is fielding-ready but static, with no scenario branching around surge pricing contexts. Suitable for simple price feedback collection rather than deep attitudinal or fairness-driver research.

優れている点

  • Clean, engaging single-question flow known to boost completion
  • Simple setup for general pricing feedback
  • Widely used, well-documented template format

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up capability
  • No built-in scenarios for surge/dynamic pricing across industries or acceptable-threshold measurement
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI methodology disclosure

よくあるご質問

「Dynamic Pricing Fairness Perceptions Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が23問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome, and thank you for participating in this research study. This survey explores your perceptions of prices that c…」・「How familiar are you with surge or dynamic pricing (i.e., prices that change based on demand, time, or availability)?」・「Next, you will see several common situations involving dynamic pricing. Please rate how fair or unfair each one feels to…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、23問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る