Biodiversity KPI Maturity & Readiness Assessment
Benchmarks employee awareness, tracking practices, data quality confidence, barriers, and priorities for biodiversity impact KPIs. Designed for sustainability, operations, and ESG teams to inform reporting strategy and capability investment.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
To your knowledge, does our organization currently have an explicit biodiversity strategy or policy?
- Yes — documented and approved
- In development
- No
- Not sure
How familiar are you with biodiversity concepts relevant to our organization?
How frequently is our organization tracking or reviewing biodiversity KPIs related to habitat (e.g., area restored, habitat condition)?
- Monthly or more often
- Quarterly
- Annually
- Ad hoc or irregularly
- Not tracked
- Not sure
Please rank the following areas by priority for improving biodiversity measurement in the next 12 months (1 = highest priority).
- Baseline assessments
- Data quality and coverage
- Tools and analytics
- Training and capability building
- Governance and ownership
- Supplier engagement
- Target setting and tracking
- Reporting and disclosure
To your knowledge, which of the following biodiversity initiatives are planned in the next 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Pilot TNFD-aligned risk assessment or disclosures
- Map biodiversity dependencies and materiality across operations
- Implement habitat restoration or offset projects
- Add supplier biodiversity or land-use requirements
- Integrate biodiversity into enterprise risk or ESG reporting
- Set or publish biodiversity targets
- None planned
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else we should consider to strengthen biodiversity measurement and KPIs?
Which function best describes your current role?
- Strategy/ESG/Sustainability
- Operations/Projects
- Procurement/Supply Chain
- Risk/Compliance/Legal
- Finance/Investor Relations
- R&D/Engineering
- HSE/Environment
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time. Your input will directly help improve how we measure and manage biodiversity impact. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate.
Which best describes your involvement with biodiversity measurement or KPIs in the past 12 months?
- I have direct responsibility for biodiversity KPIs
- I contribute indirectly to biodiversity KPIs
- I am aware but not involved
- I was not aware until this survey
Which of the following biodiversity KPIs have you seen referenced internally in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Area of habitat restored or managed
- Habitat condition or quality index
- Species richness or abundance near operations
- Supplier land-use or deforestation compliance
- Biodiversity dependency or impact valuation
- TNFD-aligned risk or disclosure metrics
- None of the above
How frequently is our organization tracking or reviewing biodiversity KPIs related to species (e.g., species richness or abundance near operations)?
- Monthly or more often
- Quarterly
- Annually
- Ad hoc or irregularly
- Not tracked
- Not sure
What are the main barriers to improving biodiversity measurement in our organization today? Select all that apply.
- Unclear ownership or governance
- Data gaps or poor data quality
- Cost and resource constraints
- Limited tools or methods
- Low executive priority
- Supplier engagement challenges
- Regulatory uncertainty
- Inconsistent definitions or standards
Briefly describe what success in biodiversity measurement and management would look like for our organization 12 months from now.
We'd like to explore your thoughts on biodiversity measurement in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
Which region do you primarily work in?
- Africa
- Asia-Pacific
- Europe
- Latin America
- Middle East
- North America
- Global
- Prefer not to say
How frequently is our organization tracking or reviewing biodiversity KPIs related to supply chain (e.g., supplier land-use or deforestation compliance)?
- Monthly or more often
- Quarterly
- Annually
- Ad hoc or irregularly
- Not tracked
- Not sure
Rank the following types of support by how much they would accelerate progress on biodiversity KPIs (1 = most helpful).
- Clear KPI definitions and standards
- Better data and analytics tools
- Budget and dedicated resources
- Training and capability building
- Leadership mandate and incentives
- Cross-functional governance
- External partnerships or expert support
How long have you been with the organization?
- Under 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–6 years
- 7–10 years
- More than 10 years
- Prefer not to say
How frequently is our organization tracking or reviewing TNFD-aligned risk or disclosure metrics?
- Monthly or more often
- Quarterly
- Annually
- Ad hoc or irregularly
- Not tracked
- Not sure
What is your current seniority level?
- Individual contributor
- Manager
- Director
- VP or equivalent
- Executive
- Prefer not to say
Which data sources does our organization primarily use for biodiversity metrics? Select all that apply.
- Internal project reports
- GIS or remote sensing (e.g., satellite imagery)
- Supplier ESG or land-use data
- Field surveys or biological monitoring
- External databases (e.g., IBAT, GBIF, national datasets)
- External consultants or assessments
- We do not collect biodiversity data
How confident are you in the quality and reliability of our organization's biodiversity data?
To your knowledge, approximately what proportion of our high-impact sites have baseline biodiversity assessments completed?
- 0% — none
- 1–25%
- 26–50%
- 51–75%
- 76–100%
- Not sure
To your knowledge, does our organization have quantified biodiversity targets?
- Yes — time-bound targets
- Yes — targets but no timeline
- Not yet
- Unsure
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。
ここが違う
- Combines structured multiple-choice benchmarking (KPI awareness, tracking frequency by biodiversity topic, data sources, target-setting) with an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into respondents' reasoning around biodiversity measurement
- Includes two ranking exercises — prioritizing improvement areas and prioritizing types of support — giving clearer signal on where to invest than single-select barrier questions alone
- Uses opinion-scale questions to quantify both familiarity with biodiversity concepts and confidence in data quality, enabling trend tracking over time
- Captures role, region, tenure, and seniority so ESG and sustainability teams can segment maturity findings by function or geography, and closes with open-text questions on what success would look like
よくあるご質問
「Biodiversity KPI Maturity & Readiness Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が25問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Biodiversity KPI Maturity & Readiness Assessment. This survey explores how our organization currently me…」・「To your knowledge, does our organization currently have an explicit biodiversity strategy or policy?」・「How familiar are you with biodiversity concepts relevant to our organization?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、25問を約11分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。