QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Clinical & Professional Supervision Quality Evaluation

Measures how well a supervisor delivers feedback, availability, psychological safety, and case guidance to the people they supervise — built for healthcare, social work, counseling, and training programs. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent supervision moment behind the overall rating, surfacing what actually helped or hindered instead of vague satisfaction talk.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your supervision experience. Your honest answers help improve how supervision is delivered — this takes about 5-6 minutes and your responses will be kept confidential from your supervisor.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last month, how often did you have a scheduled one-on-one supervision session?

  • Never
  • Once
  • 2-3 times
  • Weekly or more often
  • Supervision is on-demand, not scheduled
Q03
マトリクス必須

Thinking about your supervisor over the last 3 months, how often did they do each of the following?

6行 × 5列
  • Gave clear, actionable feedback on my work
  • Was available when I needed timely support
  • Helped me apply policies or protocols correctly to real cases
  • Encouraged me to reflect on my own reasoning rather than just handing me the answer
  • Created a safe space to discuss mistakes without fear of blame
  • ほか1件
列: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Always
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How comfortable do you feel raising a mistake or concern with your supervisor?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all comfortable最大:Extremely comfortable
Q05
評価スケール必須

Overall, how would you rate the quality of supervision you've received in the last 3 months?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q06
選択式

Which format best describes most of your supervision sessions?

  • One-on-one, in person
  • One-on-one, video or phone call
  • Group supervision session
  • Informal or ad hoc check-ins
  • A mix of formats
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these matter most to your growth as a professional, and which matter least, when it comes to what your supervisor provides?

  • Clinical or technical guidance on cases
  • Emotional support and encouragement
  • Career development advice
  • Timely feedback on my work
  • Availability and responsiveness
  • Constructive handling of mistakes
  • Help prioritizing my caseload or workload
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q08
AIインタビュー必須

Anchor on the respondent's overall quality rating and ask them to walk through one specific, recent supervision interaction that best explains that score — what the situation was, what the supervisor did or said, and what the outcome was. Probe for a concrete example rather than a general impression, and if the rating was very low or very high, ask directly what would need to change (or what should never change) for next time.

Q09
自由回答（長文）

What's one thing your supervisor could start, stop, or continue doing to better support you?

Q10
選択式

Which best describes your current role or level?

  • Trainee or student
  • Entry-level staff
  • Mid-level staff
  • Senior staff
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How long have you been supervised by your current supervisor?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3-11 months
  • 1-2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your candor. Your responses will be combined with others to help strengthen how supervision is delivered across the team.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Anchors the AI follow-up interview on the respondent's own overall rating, prompting them to reconstruct one specific recent supervision moment rather than answer in the abstract
  • Combines structured measurement (matrix of supervisor behaviors over 3 months, opinion scale on psychological safety, max-diff on what matters most to growth) with open-ended probing for context
  • Captures format and tenure context (session frequency, format, time under current supervisor) so results can be segmented by role and relationship length
  • Ends with a directed long-text prompt on what the supervisor should start/stop/continue, giving actionable, specific feedback instead of generic satisfaction scores

QuestionPro

Supervisor Evaluation Survey Questions for Feedback + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a supervisor evaluation questionnaire template paired with editorial guidance on writing supervision feedback questions, making it a reasonable direct comparable for this topic. It reads as a static question bank rather than a platform with adaptive follow-up capability. Reporting appears to rely on QuestionPro's standard survey analytics rather than any interview-style reconstruction of specific incidents.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built questionnaire specifically for supervisor/supervision feedback
  • Includes sample questions and guidance on structuring a supervision evaluation survey
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type and distribution support

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind a rating or reconstruct a specific supervision moment
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No indication of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent, published prompt methodology

よくあるご質問

「Clinical & Professional Supervision Quality Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your supervision experience. Your honest answers help improve how supervis…」・「In the last month, how often did you have a scheduled one-on-one supervision session?」・「Thinking about your supervisor over the last 3 months, how often did they do each of the following?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Nonprofit Mentoring Program Relationship & Impact Survey

Measures how mentees experience match quality, meeting consistency, and goal progress in a nonprofit mentoring program, with an AI follow-up that digs into why relationships work or stall so program staff can improve matching and support rather than just tallying satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Clinical Supervision Quality & Effectiveness Survey

Gathers clinicians' honest experience of the clinical supervision they receive — safety to disclose mistakes, usefulness of feedback, and depth of case discussion — for supervisors, training directors, or agencies auditing supervision quality. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what happened in the most recent supervision session instead of relying on general impressions.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Supervisor Performance Evaluation Survey

Measures how employees experience their direct supervisor's communication, fairness, support, and recognition. Built for HR teams and people managers running upward-feedback or 360 cycles. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind the overall effectiveness score, surfacing concrete behaviors instead of generic ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

HR Company and Supervisor Evaluation Survey

Measures how employees rate the organization overall and their direct supervisor specifically, across culture, fairness, feedback, and growth — with an AI follow-up that digs into the concrete moments behind a supervisor's rating instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Coaching Session Client Feedback Survey

Captures how clients experience individual coaching sessions — perceived progress, coach effectiveness across key behaviors, and likelihood to continue or recommend. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score, surfacing what actually drove or undermined value in the session.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Coaching Effectiveness Survey

Measures how often employees get coached, which manager behaviors actually land, and which coaching topics matter most to them — built for HR and people-development teams. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent coaching conversation to surface what's driving (or blocking) impact, instead of relying on generic satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る