Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートProduct & UX
Color Vision & Contrast Digital Accessibility Assessment
Evaluates how users with color vision differences experience color and contrast in digital interfaces, measuring pain points, satisfaction, design preferences, and customization needs to inform accessible UI/UX design.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全22問・約10分
Q02
選択式
Do you have a diagnosed or suspected color vision difference?
- Yes, clinically diagnosed
- I suspect I have one
- No
- Prefer not to say
Q03
オピニオンスケール
In the past 30 days, how often did color choices in websites or apps make it harder for you to complete tasks?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Very often
Q04
オピニオンスケール
How important is strong color contrast for your everyday use of digital interfaces?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q05
オピニオンスケール
How readable do you find light text on a dark background (e.g., white text on dark blue)?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult to read最大:Very easy to read
Q06
自由回答（長文）
Please describe a recent experience with a website or app where color or contrast either helped or hindered your ability to complete a task.
Q07
プルダウン
What is your age group?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Q08
メッセージ
Thank you for participating! Your responses are valuable and will help make digital interfaces more accessible for everyone.
Q09
プルダウン
Which type best describes your color vision difference?
- Deuteranomaly/deuteranopia (red–green)
- Protanomaly/protanopia (red–green)
- Tritanomaly/tritanopia (blue–yellow)
- Monochromacy (achromatopsia)
- Not sure
Q10
選択式
In the past 30 days, which of the following were difficult when color was the only cue? Select all that apply.
- Seeing active vs. inactive states
- Reading status badges (e.g., success, error)
- Understanding form validation states
- Reading charts or heatmaps
- Interpreting maps or legends
- Telling links from regular text
- Distinguishing buttons from text
- Other (please specify)
Q11
ランク付け
Rank the following alternatives to color-only cues from most to least helpful for you.
- Text labels
- Icons or symbols
- Patterns or textures
- Underlines or borders
- Different shapes
- Haptic or audio feedback
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q12
オピニオンスケール
How readable do you find dark text on a light background (e.g., black text on white)?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult to read最大:Very easy to read
Q13
AIインタビュー
We'd like to learn more about your color accessibility experiences. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.
Q14
選択式
Which best describes your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Q15
選択式
Which types of digital devices do you use most frequently? Select all that apply.
- Smartphone
- Tablet
- Laptop
- Desktop monitor
- Smart TV or large display
- Other
Q16
オピニオンスケール
Overall, how satisfied are you with the color accessibility of the apps and websites you regularly use?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q17
選択式
If the following customization options were available, which would you be likely to use? Select all that apply.
- High-contrast theme
- Color-blind-friendly palettes
- Increased color differences for states
- Icons on status messages
- Underline all links
- Patterns added to charts
- Other (please specify)
Q18
オピニオンスケール
How readable do you find low-contrast text (e.g., gray text on a light gray background)?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult to read最大:Very easy to read
Q19
自由回答（長文）
Based on your responses throughout this survey, is there anything else you would like designers to know about your color and contrast needs?
Q20
プルダウン
In which region do you primarily live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- South America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Q21
オピニオンスケール
How likely are you to recommend the apps or websites you currently use to someone with a similar color vision profile?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q22
オピニオンスケール
How readable do you find colored text on a colored background (e.g., red text on green)?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult to read最大:Very easy to read
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a dedicated screening flow (diagnosed/suspected color vision difference, specific type) before any experience questions, so responses can be properly segmented rather than treated as one generic audience.
- Contains four distinct readability rating scales (light-on-dark, dark-on-light, low-contrast, colored-on-colored) to quantify perception differences instead of asking one vague 'how readable is it' question.
- Pairs quantitative satisfaction/likelihood-to-recommend scales with a ranking of alternative-to-color cues and a customization-preference question, directly connecting pain points to actionable design fixes.
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that lets participants elaborate on a described accessibility incident in their own words, something a fixed-question form cannot do.
QuestionPro
Product/Service Design Survey TemplateThis is a generic product/service design feedback template, not built around color vision or accessibility at all. It's a ready-to-field static form suited for broad design satisfaction feedback, but a team studying color/contrast accessibility would need to substantially rewrite it. Useful only as a starting skeleton, not a purpose-built accessibility instrument.
優れている点
- Part of an established survey platform with broad template variety and likely easy customization
- Likely includes standard rating-scale questions for gauging product/service satisfaction
物足りない点
- No color vision, contrast, or digital accessibility focus in the template itself
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual accessibility incidents
- No published prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
SurveyMonkey
Design Feedback Survey TemplateA general-purpose design feedback template aimed at gathering opinions on a design/product, not specifically color vision or contrast accessibility. It's fielding-ready for broad UX feedback collection but doesn't address diagnosed color vision differences, readability contrast scenarios, or assistive customization needs. Would require heavy rebuilding to serve this use case.
優れている点
- Backed by a widely-used survey platform, easy to deploy quickly
- Likely covers general aesthetic/usability feedback with familiar question formats
物足りない点
- No questions targeting color vision differences or contrast-specific readability scenarios
- Fixed-question static form, no adaptive AI or voice interview to explore individual pain points
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated response quality scoring
よくあるご質問
「Color Vision & Contrast Digital Accessibility Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が22問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome! This survey explores your experience with color and contrast in digital interfaces. Your participation is volu…」・「Do you have a diagnosed or suspected color vision difference?」・「In the past 30 days, how often did color choices in websites or apps make it harder for you to complete tasks?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、22問を約10分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。