すべてのテンプレート
Events & Community

Content Moderation Appeals Experience Survey

Measures user perceptions of clarity, fairness, timeliness, and satisfaction with social media content moderation appeal processes. Designed for platform trust & safety teams seeking actionable feedback from users who have encountered moderation decisions.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全28問・約12分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to this survey about content moderation appeals on social media platforms. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes. Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. No personally identifying information will be shared. By continuing, you consent to participate in this research.

Q02
選択式

Which of the following best describes your experience with content moderation appeals in the past 12 months?

  • Submitted 2 or more appeals
  • Submitted 1 appeal
  • Considered appealing but did not submit
  • Received a moderation decision but did not consider appealing
  • No moderation decisions about my content
  • Not sure / Prefer not to say
Q03
メッセージ

The following questions ask about your experience in the past 12 months. If you submitted an appeal, please think about your most recent one.

Q04
選択式

What was the outcome of your most recent appeal?

  • Original decision was upheld
  • Decision was overturned in my favor
  • Partial change (some elements adjusted)
  • I withdrew or canceled the appeal
  • No outcome yet
Q05
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with how the platform handles content moderation appeals?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q06
ランク付け

Please rank the following aspects of an appeals process from most to least important to you.

  1. Clear reasons for decisions
  2. Fast review time
  3. Ability to add evidence
  4. Human reviewer involvement
  5. Status updates during review
  6. Detailed final explanation
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
自由回答(長文)

If you could change one thing about the content moderation appeal experience, what would it be?

Q08
選択式

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help improve the clarity and fairness of content moderation appeal processes. Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.

Q10
プルダウン

Which type of social media platform are you mainly thinking about when answering this survey?

  • General social network (e.g., Facebook)
  • Photo-sharing platform (e.g., Instagram)
  • Short-video platform (e.g., TikTok)
  • Microblogging platform (e.g., X / Twitter)
  • Discussion forum (e.g., Reddit)
  • Streaming or creator platform (e.g., YouTube, Twitch)
  • Messaging app (e.g., Telegram, Discord)
  • Multiple platforms / varies
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

Which steps of the appeal process were unclear or burdensome? Select all that apply.

  • Finding where to submit an appeal
  • Understanding the policy reason for the decision
  • Writing the appeal message
  • Providing or uploading evidence
  • Submitting the appeal form
  • Waiting for the review
  • Tracking appeal status
  • Receiving notifications or updates
  • Understanding the final explanation
  • None of the above
Q12
プルダウン

Approximately how long did it take to receive the outcome of your most recent appeal?

  • Under 1 hour
  • 1–24 hours
  • 2–3 days
  • 4–7 days
  • 8–14 days
  • 15–30 days
  • More than 30 days
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with how clearly the platform communicates about moderation decisions and appeal outcomes?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q14
AIインタビュー

Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your appeals experience in a bit more depth. Please share any additional thoughts, and our AI moderator may ask a few follow-up questions.

Q15
選択式

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How clear was the explanation of the policy your content was flagged for?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q17
オピニオンスケール

Thinking about your most recent appeal, how fair was the review process?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to use the appeal process again if you receive a future moderation decision you disagree with?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q19
自由回答(長文)

If you selected 'Prefer to self-describe,' please share here (optional).

Q20
オピニオンスケール

How clear were the instructions for submitting your appeal?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q21
オピニオンスケール

I believe the platform applied its policies consistently in my case.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q22
プルダウン

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • Central America / Caribbean
  • South America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
オピニオンスケール

How clear were the status updates provided during the review of your appeal?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q24
オピニオンスケール

I felt my perspective was genuinely considered during the appeal review.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q25
選択式

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or vocational training
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctorate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
オピニオンスケール

How clear was the explanation of the final outcome of your appeal?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q27
オピニオンスケール

I trust that my appeal was reviewed by someone (or a process) that understood the context of my content.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q28
選択式

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker / Caregiver
  • Unemployed
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes multi-part clarity ratings (policy explanation, appeal instructions, status updates, final outcome) rather than a single generic clarity question
  • Captures the actual appeal outcome and turnaround time via dedicated dropdowns, then pairs them with fairness, consistency, and trust items specific to that recent case
  • Uses a ranking exercise to surface which appeals-process attributes (speed, fairness, clarity, etc.) matter most to users, plus an open-text question on the one thing they'd change
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into each respondent's appeals experience based on their specific answers, something a static form cannot do

SurveyMonkey

Social Media Safety Survey Template & Questions

This is a fielding-ready template focused broadly on social media safety perceptions rather than the moderation-appeals journey specifically. It's the closest thematic match among available competitor pages, but it doesn't drill into appeal clarity, fairness, or timeliness the way a dedicated appeals survey would. Best viewed as an adjacent trust & safety template rather than a direct substitute.

優れている点

  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad template libraries and easy deployment
  • Likely includes built-in analytics/reporting dashboards for quick results review
  • Positioned within a recognizable 'social media safety' category that trust & safety teams already search for

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual appeal experiences
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for richer qualitative detail
  • No visible per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology, and the template targets general safety perceptions rather than the specific appeal outcome/duration/fairness chain

よくあるご質問

「Content Moderation Appeals Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が28問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to this survey about content moderation appeals on social media platforms. This survey takes approximately 12 mi…」・「Which of the following best describes your experience with content moderation appeals in the past 12 months?」・「The following questions ask about your experience in the past 12 months. If you submitted an appeal, please think about…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、28問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る