すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Desk Booking Usability & Fairness Assessment

Measures employee perceptions of desk/hot-desking system usability, allocation fairness, and access barriers over a 4-week lookback period to guide UX and policy improvements.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全27問・約12分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Desk Booking Experience Survey. This survey gathers your feedback on the desk booking system — its usability, fairness, and how well it meets your needs. Your responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate to improve the booking experience. There are no right or wrong answers — we want your honest opinions. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. Estimated time: 12 minutes.

Q02
プルダウン

In the past 4 weeks, how often did you try to book a desk?

  • I did not try to book
  • Once
  • 2 to 3 times
  • 4 to 7 times
  • 8 or more times
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Thinking about the past 4 weeks, how easy or difficult was it to find an available desk that met your needs?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q04
選択式

Which issues, if any, did you encounter when booking a desk in the past 4 weeks? Select all that apply.

  • None — I had no issues
  • No desks available at needed times
  • Bookings held by no-shows
  • Colleagues booking desks for others
  • Desk amenities different than listed
  • Map inaccurate or hard to read
  • System errors or crashes
  • Rules or priorities unclear
  • Accessibility needs not supported
Q05
オピニオンスケール

How important is ease of booking to you in the desk booking system?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q06
AIインタビュー

We'd like to understand your desk booking experience in more depth. Please share what has been working well or what frustrations you've encountered, and I'll ask a couple of follow-up questions.

Q07
プルダウン

Which region is your primary work location?

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Latin America
  • Middle East/Africa
  • Multiple regions
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are anonymous and will be used in aggregate to improve the desk booking system. If you have further concerns, please contact your Workplace Experience team.

Q09
選択式

In the past 4 weeks, how did you access the desk booking system? Select all that apply.

  • Company laptop
  • Personal laptop
  • Mobile app (iOS/Android)
  • Web browser on desktop
  • Kiosk or tablet in the office
  • Help from a colleague or administrator
Q10
オピニオンスケール

How easy or difficult was it to read and navigate the floor map or seating layout?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q11
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how fair or unfair is access to desks across employees and teams?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How important is fair access across employees to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q13
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, what single change would most improve the desk booking experience for you?

Q14
プルダウン

What is your role type?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Executive
  • Contractor/Temporary
  • Intern
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How easy or difficult was it to modify or cancel an existing booking?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How clear or unclear are the desk booking rules and priority system at your workplace?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How important is being seated near your team to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q18
プルダウン

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–11 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–9 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
オピニオンスケール

How easy or difficult was it to check in or confirm your desk on arrival?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q20
ランク付け

If desk demand exceeds supply, which allocation approaches do you most prefer? Rank from most preferred to least preferred.

  1. First-come, first-served
  2. Rotating priority days by team
  3. Priority for accessibility needs
  4. Daily or weekly cap per person
  5. Proximity to team prioritized
  6. Random lottery when demand exceeds supply
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How important is having reliable and accurate desk amenity information to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q22
プルダウン

What is your typical work pattern?

  • On-site most days (4–5 days/week)
  • Hybrid (2–3 days/week on-site)
  • Hybrid (1 day/week on-site)
  • Fully remote (0 days on-site)
  • Varies week to week
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how easy or difficult is the desk booking system to use?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very difficult最大:Very easy
Q24
オピニオンスケール

How important is flexibility to change or cancel bookings to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important
Q25
選択式

Do you have any workstation accessibility needs you are comfortable sharing? Select all that apply.

  • Adjustable desk height
  • Accessible path of travel
  • Proximity to quiet area
  • Ergonomic chair
  • Assistive technology (e.g., screen reader)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
オピニオンスケール

How satisfied are you with the desk booking experience overall?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q27
オピニオンスケール

How important is maximizing overall seat utilization to you?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all important最大:Extremely important

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Covers the full 4-week desk booking lifecycle in one flow — finding a desk, reading the floor map, modifying/cancelling, and checking in on arrival — not just a generic usability score
  • Pairs usability ratings with fairness-specific questions (perceived fairness across teams, clarity of priority rules, and a ranked preference on allocation approaches under scarcity)
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended context behind low scores, plus an open-text 'single change' question, giving qualitative depth static scale-only forms can't reach
  • Segments results by region, role type, tenure, and work pattern, and asks about accessibility needs, so UX and policy teams can see where barriers concentrate

QuestionPro

System Usability Scale Survey Template | Sample Survey, Examples, Questions & Questionnaires

This is a generic System Usability Scale (SUS) template, not built for desk/hot-desking specifically — a team would need to adapt the standard SUS items to the booking context themselves. It's presented as a ready-to-use question set, but the surrounding page is largely educational/reference content about the SUS methodology rather than a fielding-ready, topic-specific survey.

優れている点

  • Based on the well-established, psychometrically validated SUS methodology
  • Comes with explanatory guidance on how to interpret SUS scores
  • Easy to adapt as a generic usability baseline for any software, including a booking tool

物足りない点

  • No desk-booking-specific content (no fairness/allocation questions, no floor map or check-in items)
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on low scores
  • No mechanism for automated qualitative analysis or per-response quality scoring

Typeform

System Usability Survey Template

Another generic usability survey template based on standard usability-scale conventions, delivered in Typeform's conversational form format. It's a ready-to-field template, but it measures general software usability rather than anything specific to desk booking, allocation fairness, or hot-desking policy.

優れている点

  • Clean, conversational form-filling experience typical of Typeform
  • Quick to deploy for a general usability pulse-check
  • Familiar, easy-to-benchmark usability scoring approach

物足りない点

  • No content addressing desk allocation fairness, priority rules, or seat scarcity trade-offs
  • Fixed question flow with no adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up
  • No built-in automated report generation tied to open-ended responses

よくあるご質問

「Desk Booking Usability & Fairness Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が27問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Desk Booking Experience Survey. This survey gathers your feedback on the desk booking system — its usabil…」・「In the past 4 weeks, how often did you try to book a desk?」・「Thinking about the past 4 weeks, how easy or difficult was it to find an available desk that met your needs?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、27問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る