すべてのテンプレート
Product & UX

Prototype Usability Debrief Survey

A structured post-session debrief for prototype usability tests, measuring task completion, perceived difficulty, friction points, and improvement priorities to inform iterative design decisions.

登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限

ライブプレビュー
Prototype Usability Debrief Survey

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this usability session debrief. This short survey (approximately 12 minutes) asks about your experience with the prototype you just tested. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest impressions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve the product. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Powered by QuestionPunk

デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全25問・約12分
メッセージ

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this usability session debrief. This short survey (approximately 12 minutes) asks about your experience with the prototype you just tested. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest impressions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve the product. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q01
選択式

Have you tested interactive prototypes before today?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q02
プルダウン

Which device did you primarily use during this session?

  • Desktop or laptop
  • Smartphone
  • Tablet
  • Other
Q03
プルダウン

Which browser did you use during this session?

  • Chrome
  • Safari
  • Firefox
  • Edge
  • Other
  • Not sure
メッセージ

Now think about the main task you were asked to complete during this session.

Q04
選択式

Were you able to complete the main task in this session?

  • Completed without issues
  • Completed with minor issues
  • Completed with major issues
  • Partially completed
  • Could not complete
  • Did not attempt
Q05
プルダウン

Approximately how long did it take you to finish or stop the main task?

  • Less than 1 minute
  • 1–2 minutes
  • 3–5 minutes
  • 6–10 minutes
  • More than 10 minutes
  • Not sure
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How easy or difficult was the main task to complete?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very easy最大:Very difficult
Q07
プルダウン

How many errors or restarts did you experience during the main task, if any?

  • 0 (none)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4 or more
  • Not sure
Q08
選択式

Did you use any of the following to help you proceed? Select all that apply.

  • No help needed
  • Used on-screen hints or tooltips
  • Retried steps or guessed
  • Sought help from someone
  • Used search
  • Other
Q09
オピニオンスケール

The navigation structure was clear and predictable.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q10
オピニオンスケール

Labels and instructions were easy to understand.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q11
オピニオンスケール

The visual design helped me focus on the right actions.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q12
オピニオンスケール

The overall flow of steps felt logical and efficient.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q13
自由回答(長文)

In one sentence, what did the main flow help you accomplish?

Q14
選択式

Which of the following obstacles, if any, did you encounter during the task? Select all that apply.

  • Couldn't find the right feature
  • Unclear wording or labels
  • Navigation felt inconsistent
  • Buttons or links didn't work
  • Pages loaded slowly
  • Too much visual clutter
  • Form or validation issues
  • No obstacles
  • Other
Q15
自由回答(長文)

If you encountered any friction during the task, please briefly describe the most significant point.

Q16
選択式

If you could change one thing about this prototype, what would you change first?

  • Make labels clearer
  • Simplify navigation
  • Improve visibility of the primary action
  • Reduce the number of steps
  • Improve error messages and guidance
  • Increase contrast and visual hierarchy
  • Nothing—it works as is
  • Other
Q17
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with the prototype experience?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q18
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend this product to a colleague, based on what you experienced today?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q19
AIインタビュー

We'd like to learn a bit more about your experience. A short follow-up conversation will ask a couple of questions based on your earlier responses.

Q20
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experience with the prototype?

Q21
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
選択式

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
プルダウン

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
プルダウン

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
プルダウン

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker or caregiver
  • Unemployed and seeking work
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
メッセージ

Thank you for your time—your feedback will directly help us improve this prototype!

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines structured usability metrics (task completion, time-on-task, error/restart counts, workarounds used) with attitudinal ratings on navigation, labels, visual design, and flow
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that can adaptively probe on friction points and obstacles reported earlier in the survey, rather than relying only on fixed follow-up questions
  • Captures open-text detail on what the main flow helped users accomplish and the single most disruptive friction point, giving qualitative context to the quantitative scores
  • Rounds out the debrief with device/browser context and demographic segmentation (age, gender, region, education, employment) for cross-cutting analysis of usability results

QuestionPro

System Usability Scale Survey Template

This is a fielding-ready template built around the classic System Usability Scale (SUS), a well-known 10-item standardized instrument. It's a solid choice for teams wanting a validated, benchmarkable usability score, but it is a fixed-question static form rather than a task-specific prototype debrief. It doesn't cover task-level friction detail (device, errors, obstacles) the way a dedicated prototype debrief would.

優れている点

  • Based on a widely recognized, standardized usability scale (SUS) with established benchmarking norms
  • Fielding-ready template usable out of the box
  • QuestionPro's platform supports broader survey logic and reporting features

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual responses
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share task capability
  • No per-response automated quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Website Usability Survey Template

This template targets general website usability feedback rather than a structured post-session prototype test debrief, so it's a comparable but not identical use case. SurveySparrow's conversational, chat-style form format is a genuine strength for completion rates. It lacks the task-specific structure (completion, time-on-task, error counts) built into a true usability test debrief.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-like survey format designed to improve engagement and completion
  • Fielding-ready template aimed at general website feedback
  • Part of a broader survey platform with omnichannel distribution

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview or voice AI interview option
  • Not structured around discrete task completion, time-on-task, or error tracking specific to prototype testing
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt methodology

Typeform

System Usability Survey Template

Another SUS-style template, this one built on Typeform's polished single-question-per-screen interface. It's fielding-ready and easy to distribute, but like other SUS templates it's a fixed set of attitudinal statements rather than a task-by-task usability debrief with completion and friction tracking. It also does not include any live or AI-assisted interview component.

優れている点

  • Clean, single-question interface known for higher completion rates on longer surveys
  • Fielding-ready and quick to deploy
  • Based on the standardized SUS methodology

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
  • No structured task completion, time-on-task, or error/restart tracking
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt-level methodology disclosed

よくあるご質問

「Prototype Usability Debrief Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が25問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Have you tested interactive prototypes before today?」・「Which device did you primarily use during this session?」・「Which browser did you use during this session?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、25問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る