QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Product & UX

Prototype Usability Debrief Survey

A structured post-session debrief for prototype usability tests, measuring task completion, perceived difficulty, friction points, and improvement priorities to inform iterative design decisions.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全28問・約12分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome, and thank you for participating in this usability session debrief. This short survey (approximately 12 minutes) asks about your experience with the prototype you just tested. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest impressions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve the product. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
選択式

Have you tested interactive prototypes before today?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
メッセージ

Now think about the main task you were asked to complete during this session.

Q04
オピニオンスケール

The navigation structure was clear and predictable.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q05
選択式

Which of the following obstacles, if any, did you encounter during the task? Select all that apply.

  • Couldn't find the right feature
  • Unclear wording or labels
  • Navigation felt inconsistent
  • Buttons or links didn't work
  • Pages loaded slowly
  • Too much visual clutter
  • Form or validation issues
  • No obstacles
  • Other
Q06
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with the prototype experience?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q07
AIインタビュー

We'd like to learn a bit more about your experience. A short follow-up conversation will ask a couple of questions based on your earlier responses.

Q08
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time—your feedback will directly help us improve this prototype!

Q10
プルダウン

Which device did you primarily use during this session?

  • Desktop or laptop
  • Smartphone
  • Tablet
  • Other
Q11
選択式

Were you able to complete the main task in this session?

  • Completed without issues
  • Completed with minor issues
  • Completed with major issues
  • Partially completed
  • Could not complete
  • Did not attempt
Q12
オピニオンスケール

Labels and instructions were easy to understand.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q13
自由回答（長文）

If you encountered any friction during the task, please briefly describe the most significant point.

Q14
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend this product to a colleague, based on what you experienced today?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q15
自由回答（長文）

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experience with the prototype?

Q16
選択式

Which best describes your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
プルダウン

Which browser did you use during this session?

  • Chrome
  • Safari
  • Firefox
  • Edge
  • Other
  • Not sure
Q18
プルダウン

Approximately how long did it take you to finish or stop the main task?

  • Less than 1 minute
  • 1–2 minutes
  • 3–5 minutes
  • 6–10 minutes
  • More than 10 minutes
  • Not sure
Q19
オピニオンスケール

The visual design helped me focus on the right actions.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q20
選択式

If you could change one thing about this prototype, what would you change first?

  • Make labels clearer
  • Simplify navigation
  • Improve visibility of the primary action
  • Reduce the number of steps
  • Improve error messages and guidance
  • Increase contrast and visual hierarchy
  • Nothing—it works as is
  • Other
Q21
プルダウン

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America and the Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
オピニオンスケール

How easy or difficult was the main task to complete?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very easy最大:Very difficult
Q23
オピニオンスケール

The overall flow of steps felt logical and efficient.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q24
プルダウン

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college
  • Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
プルダウン

How many errors or restarts did you experience during the main task, if any?

  • 0 (none)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4 or more
  • Not sure
Q26
自由回答（長文）

In one sentence, what did the main flow help you accomplish?

Q27
プルダウン

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker or caregiver
  • Unemployed and seeking work
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
選択式

Did you use any of the following to help you proceed? Select all that apply.

  • No help needed
  • Used on-screen hints or tooltips
  • Retried steps or guessed
  • Sought help from someone
  • Used search
  • Other

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Combines structured usability metrics (task completion, time-on-task, error/restart counts, workarounds used) with attitudinal ratings on navigation, labels, visual design, and flow
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that can adaptively probe on friction points and obstacles reported earlier in the survey, rather than relying only on fixed follow-up questions
  • Captures open-text detail on what the main flow helped users accomplish and the single most disruptive friction point, giving qualitative context to the quantitative scores
  • Rounds out the debrief with device/browser context and demographic segmentation (age, gender, region, education, employment) for cross-cutting analysis of usability results

QuestionPro

System Usability Scale Survey Template

This is a fielding-ready template built around the classic System Usability Scale (SUS), a well-known 10-item standardized instrument. It's a solid choice for teams wanting a validated, benchmarkable usability score, but it is a fixed-question static form rather than a task-specific prototype debrief. It doesn't cover task-level friction detail (device, errors, obstacles) the way a dedicated prototype debrief would.

優れている点

  • Based on a widely recognized, standardized usability scale (SUS) with established benchmarking norms
  • Fielding-ready template usable out of the box
  • QuestionPro's platform supports broader survey logic and reporting features

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual responses
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share task capability
  • No per-response automated quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Website Usability Survey Template

This template targets general website usability feedback rather than a structured post-session prototype test debrief, so it's a comparable but not identical use case. SurveySparrow's conversational, chat-style form format is a genuine strength for completion rates. It lacks the task-specific structure (completion, time-on-task, error counts) built into a true usability test debrief.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-like survey format designed to improve engagement and completion
  • Fielding-ready template aimed at general website feedback
  • Part of a broader survey platform with omnichannel distribution

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview or voice AI interview option
  • Not structured around discrete task completion, time-on-task, or error tracking specific to prototype testing
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt methodology

Typeform

System Usability Survey Template

Another SUS-style template, this one built on Typeform's polished single-question-per-screen interface. It's fielding-ready and easy to distribute, but like other SUS templates it's a fixed set of attitudinal statements rather than a task-by-task usability debrief with completion and friction tracking. It also does not include any live or AI-assisted interview component.

優れている点

  • Clean, single-question interface known for higher completion rates on longer surveys
  • Fielding-ready and quick to deploy
  • Based on the standardized SUS methodology

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
  • No structured task completion, time-on-task, or error/restart tracking
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt-level methodology disclosed

よくあるご質問

「Prototype Usability Debrief Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が28問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome, and thank you for participating in this usability session debrief. This short survey (approximately 12 minutes)…」・「Have you tested interactive prototypes before today?」・「Now think about the main task you were asked to complete during this session.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、28問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Product & UX

Product Retention & Value Proposition Assessment

Measures why active users stay, what value they perceive, and where retention risk exists. Designed for product teams assessing product-market fit, switching costs, and competitive positioning.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Product Usability & User Experience Feedback Survey

Evaluates how easy, efficient, and satisfying your product or website is to use, combining attribute ratings and a prioritization exercise with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real recent moment of friction instead of relying on vague complaints. Built for product, design, and research teams running ongoing usability tracking.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

User Interface Usability & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how easy, clear, and satisfying your product's interface is to use in real day-to-day tasks — combining a multi-element usability rating, a trade-off exercise on what to fix first, and an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the exact moment a user got stuck instead of relying on vague complaints.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Product & Service Design Feedback Survey

Captures how people actually use your product or service, which features matter most, and where the experience breaks down — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment a respondent got stuck or frustrated. Built for product, UX, and service design teams shaping a roadmap.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Unmoderated Usability Test with Screen Share & Voice

A self-serve usability session: participants share their screen, complete guided tasks on your website or prototype while thinking aloud, and the AI moderator watches, prompts, and probes — then debriefs them. You get recordings, transcripts, and task-level analysis without scheduling a single session.

テンプレートを見る
Product & UX

Website Usability & Task Completion Survey

Measures site visitors' ability to complete tasks, evaluates navigation ease, content clarity, visual design, and load speed, and identifies specific usability barriers. Suitable for intercept or post-visit deployment on any website.

テンプレートを見る