Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection Survey
A structured self-evaluation for performance review cycles, covering goal achievement, competency ratings, challenges, and development priorities. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific evidence behind the employee's self-rating instead of accepting vague self-praise or self-criticism at face value. Built for HR and people managers running review or check-in cycles.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
自由回答（長文）必須
What were your most significant accomplishments during this review period? Be specific about what you did and the impact it had.
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
Thinking about the goals you set at the start of this period, how fully did you achieve them?
スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Did not achieve my goals最大:Fully achieved and exceeded my goals
Q04
マトリクス必須
How would you rate your own performance in each of the following areas this period?
5行 × 4列
- Quality of work
- Meeting deadlines and commitments
- Communication and collaboration
- Problem-solving and initiative
- Adaptability to change
列: Needs improvement · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations · Outstanding
Q05
自由回答（長文）必須
What was the biggest obstacle or challenge you faced this period, and how did you handle it?
Q06
ランク付け必須
Rank these areas in order of where you most want to grow next period, from highest to lowest priority.
- Technical or functional skills
- Leadership and people management
- Communication skills
- Strategic thinking
- Time management and prioritization
- Cross-team collaboration
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
AIインタビュー
Reconstruct the concrete evidence behind this person's self-rating: ask for a specific example that best illustrates their top accomplishment (what happened, their role, the measurable outcome) and a specific example tied to the biggest obstacle they described (what they tried, what worked or didn't). If their goal-achievement rating was very high or very low, probe for the reasoning and check whether it's supported by specifics or is a vague impression. Also ask what would most help them make progress on their top-ranked development priority in the next period.
Q08
自由回答（短文）
If you could get support or resources for just one thing next period, what would it be?
Q09
選択式
Which department or team are you part of? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual department list before launching.)
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- Prefer not to say
Q10
選択式
How long have you been in your current role?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式
Which best describes your current role level?
- Individual contributor
- Team lead or supervisor
- Manager
- Senior manager or director
- Executive or VP and above
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
Thank you for taking the time to reflect honestly. Your responses will be shared with your manager ahead of your review conversation to help ground the discussion in specifics.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the concrete evidence behind an employee's self-rating instead of accepting vague self-praise or self-criticism at face value
- Pairs a matrix question rating performance across multiple competency areas with an opinion scale on goal achievement, giving structured quantitative context before the open-ended probing begins
- Uses a ranking question to surface prioritized development areas for next period, plus a short-text question pinpointing the single most valuable support or resource an employee needs
- Frames the whole flow with welcome and closing chat messages that set expectations for honest reflection and explain how responses will be used in the review cycle
Jotform
Civil Service Employee Self Evaluation Form TemplateA static, fillable self-evaluation form built for civil service roles, easy to customize with Jotform's drag-and-drop builder. It collects self-ratings and written reflections but has no mechanism to probe or verify the substance behind an employee's answers. Best suited to organizations wanting a quick, generic form rather than a deeper reflection process.
優れている点
- Purpose-built for civil service/government self-evaluation use cases
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
- Widely used, familiar form-building ecosystem
物足りない点
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to challenge vague or inflated self-ratings
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
- No voice AI interview option or transparent prompt methodology
SurveyMonkey
Employee Self-Evaluation Form TemplateA standard survey template from a major survey platform, likely covering goal review and competency self-ratings. It's a fielding-ready static template but relies entirely on pre-written questions with no capability to dig deeper into individual responses. Good for basic data collection, less suited to nuanced performance conversations.
優れている点
- Backed by a well-established, high-reliability survey platform
- Likely includes built-in analytics and reporting dashboards
- Simple to deploy across large employee populations
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to interrogate the evidence behind self-ratings
- No per-response quality scoring
- No transparent, published interview prompt methodology
SurveySparrow
Intern Self Evaluation Form TemplateA conversational-style form aimed specifically at intern self-evaluations rather than general employee performance review cycles, so it's a narrower fit for HR-run review processes. It offers a friendlier, chat-like UI but still presents a fixed question sequence. Useful as a lightweight intern check-in rather than a full performance reflection tool.
優れている点
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI style
- Tailored specifically to the intern experience
- Part of a broader survey suite with sharing and distribution tools
物足りない点
- Designed for interns, not general employee performance review cycles
- No adaptive AI interview to probe self-rating evidence
- No automated response quality scoring or voice interview option
Typeform
Self Evaluation Form TemplateA generic self-evaluation template using Typeform's signature conversational, one-question-per-screen format. It's visually polished and easy to brand, but the flow is a fixed sequence of pre-written questions with logic jumps rather than genuine adaptive interviewing. Fits simple, low-stakes reflection exercises more than in-depth performance review analysis.
優れている点
- Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
- Simple logic-jump branching between questions
- Strong template library and design customization
物足りない点
- Logic jumps are not the same as true adaptive AI follow-up probing on specific answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated review reports
- No voice AI interview option or published prompt transparency
よくあるご質問
「Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Welcome to your self-evaluation for this review period. Reflecting honestly here helps your manager understand your work…」・「What were your most significant accomplishments during this review period? Be specific about what you did and the impact…」・「Thinking about the goals you set at the start of this period, how fully did you achieve them?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。