すべてのテンプレート
Product & UX

Feature Request Deep-Dive Survey

Captures a specific feature request in the requester's own words, gauges how urgent and impactful it would be, and benchmarks it against other candidate ideas using a best-worst trade-off exercise. Built for product teams triaging inbound requests, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact workflow the feature would unblock and what the person does today without it.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking the time to share a feature idea with us! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 4-5 minutes and helps us understand exactly what you need and how urgent it is.

Q02
選択式必須

Which part of the product is your feature request about?

  • (Replace with Product Area A, e.g., Reporting)
  • (Replace with Product Area B, e.g., Integrations)
  • (Replace with Product Area C, e.g., Mobile App)
  • Not sure / general
Q03
自由回答(長文)必須

Describe the feature you'd like to see. What would it do, and what problem would it solve for you?

Q04
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how have you been getting this done without the feature?

  • I use a workaround inside the product
  • I use a separate/third-party tool
  • I do it manually outside any tool
  • I haven't been able to do it at all
  • This is a brand-new need I haven't tried to solve before
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

If we built this feature exactly as you described, how much would it improve your day-to-day experience with (Replace with Product Name)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No improvement最大:Massive improvement
Q06
評価スケール必須

How urgently do you need this feature?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not urgent - nice to have最大:Extremely urgent - blocking my work
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

Here are several potential features we're considering. For each set shown, pick the one you'd want most and the one you'd want least. (Template note: replace this list with your own shortlist of candidate features before launching.)

  • (Replace with Feature Idea 1)
  • (Replace with Feature Idea 2)
  • (Replace with Feature Idea 3)
  • (Replace with Feature Idea 4)
  • (Replace with Feature Idea 5)
  • (Replace with Feature Idea 6)
  • (Replace with Feature Idea 7)
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most wanted最も悪い:Least wanted
Q08
選択式

If this feature shipped, how would it affect your likelihood of continuing to use (Replace with Product Name)?

  • Much more likely to continue/upgrade
  • Somewhat more likely
  • No change
  • Somewhat less likely
  • Much less likely
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the exact workflow behind this request: what the respondent was trying to do right before they wished this feature existed, what they did instead, and what it cost them (time, errors, a missed deadline). If they rated the improvement as low or said it's not urgent, probe whether the feature idea itself is the problem or whether the underlying need is already being met another way. Anchor follow-ups on the specific words they used in their feature description rather than generic satisfaction language.

Q10
選択式

What's your role?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director/VP
  • C-level/Founder
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How many people work at your company?

  • 1-10
  • 11-50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1,000
  • 1,000+
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything - thank you! Your request and priorities go straight into our product roadmap review, and the AI follow-up helps us understand exactly what to build.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Captures the feature request in the requester's own words via an open-ended description question, then uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the exact workflow the feature would unblock and what they do today without it
  • Quantifies urgency and expected impact separately (opinion scale for improvement, rating for urgency) rather than relying on a single vague priority field
  • Benchmarks the request against other candidate features using a best-worst max-diff exercise, so product teams get relative prioritization data, not just isolated feedback
  • Ties the request to churn risk and account context (likelihood to continue using the product, role, company size) so triage can weigh strategic accounts appropriately

Jotform

Feature Request Form Template

A static, fielding-ready form for collecting feature suggestions with Jotform's drag-and-drop builder and standard field types. It's built for quick intake rather than structured prioritization or trade-off analysis. No mechanism for probing deeper into a specific request's context.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder
  • Easy integration with Jotform's wider form ecosystem (notifications, spreadsheets, apps)
  • Simple to deploy for basic intake without configuration overhead

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to reconstruct the requester's actual workflow or current workaround
  • No built-in method for benchmarking one request against other candidate features
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or generated prioritization report

SurveyMonkey

Feature Request Template

A standard survey template for gathering feature suggestions, backed by SurveyMonkey's broader analytics and reporting suite. It focuses on structured multiple-choice and rating questions rather than open-ended workflow reconstruction. Best suited to lightweight feedback collection rather than deep prioritization exercises.

優れている点

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey analytics and dashboard reporting
  • Familiar respondent experience with broad completion-rate benchmarking data
  • Easy to combine with SurveyMonkey's audience panel for distribution

物足りない点

  • Fixed question flow with no adaptive AI interview to dig into the specific problem or workaround behind a request
  • No native best-worst trade-off exercise to compare requests against each other
  • No transparent, published follow-up prompt methodology

Typeform

Feature Request Form

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time form template well suited to a pleasant intake experience. It focuses on presentation and flow rather than structured impact scoring or cross-request benchmarking. Good for lightweight collection, less suited to product teams needing prioritization data.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface that Typeform is known for
  • Strong visual/branding customization for a pleasant respondent experience
  • Simple logic jumps for basic branching

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to reconstruct the requester's workflow or current workaround
  • No max-diff or similar mechanism to rank a request against other candidate ideas
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated triage report

よくあるご質問

「Feature Request Deep-Dive Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking the time to share a feature idea with us! Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. T…」・「Which part of the product is your feature request about?」・「Describe the feature you'd like to see. What would it do, and what problem would it solve for you?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る