Field Trip Experience Feedback Survey
Measures how well a school, museum, or organizational field trip delivered on learning value, logistics, and safety, gathered from teachers, chaperones, and parents — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the specific moment the trip clicked or fell apart instead of relying on a single satisfaction score.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Overall, how would you rate this field trip?
How would you rate each part of the trip?
- Pre-trip communication
- Transportation logistics
- Educational value of the destination
- Safety and supervision
- Value for the cost
Which part of the trip did participants seem most engaged with?
- Guided tour or presentation
- Hands-on activity or workshop
- Free exploration time
- Group discussion or debrief
- Nothing stood out
Rank these factors by how much they matter for planning the next field trip, most important first.
- Transportation arrangements
- Itinerary pacing
- Group size
- Cost per participant
- Alignment with learning goals
How likely are you to recommend this trip to other classes or groups next year?
Reconstruct the single moment that most shaped this respondent's overall rating — ask them to describe exactly what happened, where, and why it stood out, whether positive or negative. If their recommendation score was low, probe what specifically would need to change for them to recommend the trip next time; if high, probe whether that moment could be intentionally recreated on future trips.
What's one specific change that would make the next field trip better?
Which best describes your role on this trip?
- Teacher or educator
- Chaperone
- Parent or guardian
- Student
- Other staff
- Prefer not to say
What grade level or age group were the trip participants?
- Early elementary (K-2)
- Upper elementary (3-5)
- Middle school (6-8)
- High school (9-12)
- College or adult group
- Prefer not to say
Thanks so much for your feedback! Responses across chaperones, teachers, and parents will be combined into a report used to plan and improve future field trips.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment the trip clicked or fell apart, going beyond a single satisfaction score
- Combines quantitative ratings (overall opinion scale, matrix breakdown by trip component, recommendation likelihood) with open-ended and ranking questions for planning priorities
- Separates respondent context (role on trip, grade/age level) so feedback from teachers, chaperones, and parents can be compared meaningfully
- Auto-generates a report from all responses without requiring manual tallying of matrix or ranking data
QuestionPro
Field trip survey questions in a sample survey templateThis is a sample set of field trip survey questions presented as a static template within QuestionPro's broader survey platform. It covers standard satisfaction and logistics questions but is offered as a fixed question list rather than an adaptive interview experience. Useful as a starting question bank, though it requires manual customization for role-specific feedback (teacher vs. chaperone vs. parent).
優れている点
- Established survey platform with broad question-type support (ratings, multiple choice, etc.)
- Provides a ready reference list of field-trip-relevant questions
- Backed by QuestionPro's general reporting and analytics tools
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a rating was given or reconstruct a specific moment
- No voice AI interview option
- No published methodology for how responses are scored or weighted
SurveySparrow
Field Trip Survey TemplateSurveySparrow offers a conversational-style field trip questionnaire template, which is closer to fielding-ready than a plain form but still relies on pre-set question flows rather than dynamic AI-driven probing. It's built for general education feedback collection and includes SurveySparrow's typical chat-like survey UI. No indication of voice interviews or automated per-response quality scoring.
優れている点
- Conversational survey format that may feel more engaging than a plain form
- Education-focused template tailored to field trip contexts
- Part of a platform with broader survey distribution and reporting features
物足りない点
- Lacks an adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment that shaped a respondent's rating
- No voice AI interview capability
- No transparent, published prompt-level methodology for how feedback is interpreted
よくあるご質問
「Field Trip Experience Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for sharing feedback on the recent field trip! This helps us plan better trips going forward. Your responses are…」・「Overall, how would you rate this field trip?」・「How would you rate each part of the trip?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。