QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Vacation Travel Planning & Satisfaction Survey

Explores how travelers choose, book, and experience vacation trips — from destination trade-offs and price sensitivity to satisfaction with the actual experience. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind a recent trip, surfacing moments of friction or delight that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for travel brands, tour operators, and hospitality teams.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Hi! We're researching how people plan and experience vacation travel. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6-7 minutes and there are no right or wrong answers — just tell us about your real experiences.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 12 months, how many leisure trips of 2+ nights have you taken?

  • None
  • 1 trip
  • 2-3 trips
  • 4-5 trips
  • 6 or more trips
Q03
選択式必須

How did you book most of your most recent vacation trip?

  • Directly with the airline/hotel website
  • An online travel booking site (e.g., Expedia, Booking.com)
  • A travel agent or advisor
  • A package deal or tour operator
  • Through a friend, family member, or referral
Q04
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

When choosing a vacation destination, which of these matter most vs. least to you?

  • Overall cost of the trip
  • Weather and time of year
  • Direct flight availability
  • Safety and travel advisories
  • Unique local experiences and culture
  • Family- or kid-friendliness
  • Recommendations from friends or online reviews
  • Availability of relaxation/beach time
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

Thinking about your most recent vacation, how satisfied were you overall?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q06
マトリクス必須

Rate your most recent vacation on each of the following:

5行 × 5列
  • Accommodation quality
  • Transportation and getting around
  • Value for the price paid
  • Ease of planning and booking
  • On-the-ground customer service
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q07
価格感度分析（Van Westendorp）必須

Thinking about a one-week vacation package (flights, hotel, and one guided activity included) for one person, please answer the following:

  • At what price would you consider this package so cheap that you'd question its quality?
  • At what price would you consider this package a bargain — a great buy for the money?
  • At what price would you consider this package starting to feel expensive, but you'd still consider it?
  • At what price would you consider this package too expensive to consider at all?
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend the destination of your most recent vacation to a friend or colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the real story of the respondent's most recent vacation: why they chose that destination, one moment that exceeded expectations and one that fell short, and how those moments connect to their overall satisfaction rating. If they rated satisfaction low or gave a low recommendation likelihood, probe specifically what would have changed their mind. If cost concerns came up in the pricing questions, ask what specifically felt worth paying for versus not.

Q10
選択式

What is your age range? (Prefer not to say is fine)

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your typical annual household travel budget? (Prefer not to say is fine)

  • Under $1,000
  • $1,000-$2,999
  • $3,000-$5,999
  • $6,000-$9,999
  • $10,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your travel experiences! Your responses will help shape better destinations, pricing, and trip experiences for future travelers.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Pairs closed-ended questions (trip frequency, booking channel, satisfaction ratings, Van Westendorp pricing, MaxDiff trade-offs) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the real story of the respondent's most recent trip — surfacing friction and delight moments that ratings alone miss
  • Uses a Van Westendorp price sensitivity module for a one-week vacation package, giving travel brands and tour operators defensible pricing signals, not just a single 'how much would you pay' question
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports mean teams get analysis-ready output instead of raw export files to manually code
  • Transparent prompts let travel and hospitality teams see exactly what the AI asked and why, rather than trusting a black-box scoring system

Jotform

Prospective Travel Client Vacation Form Template

This is a prospective-client intake form built for a travel agency's sales workflow, not a research survey about vacation planning and satisfaction. It's a fielding-ready form, but its purpose (capturing lead details for booking) differs from a structured satisfaction/behavior study. Relevant to the travel space but a different use case than a market-research template.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for capturing prospective traveler contact and trip preference details
  • Drag-and-drop Jotform builder makes it easy to customize form fields
  • Fielding-ready out of the box for a travel agency intake flow

物足りない点

  • Designed as a client intake/lead form, not a satisfaction or planning research instrument
  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — a static field set with no ability to probe deeper on any answer
  • No structured pricing methodology (e.g., Van Westendorp) or trade-off analysis (e.g., MaxDiff) built in

SurveyMonkey

Vacation Survey Template + Example Questions

A straightforward, fielding-ready vacation survey template with example questions covering trip planning and preferences. It's a solid generic starting point but relies entirely on fixed-choice and rating questions. No mechanism to explore the 'why' behind a rating beyond whatever open-text box is included.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with broad distribution and analysis tooling
  • Ready-to-use template with example questions to speed up setup
  • Familiar interface for teams already using SurveyMonkey for other research

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview — cannot dynamically probe an individual respondent's specific trip story
  • No voice interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or summarized, unlike a transparent-prompt approach

SurveySparrow

Vacation Survey Template | Gather Travel Preferences

A conversational-style vacation survey template focused on gathering travel preferences, in keeping with SurveySparrow's chat-like UI. It's fielding-ready but still a fixed question flow — the 'conversational' feel is a UI treatment, not adaptive branching driven by the content of an answer.

優れている点

  • Chat-style presentation may improve completion rates versus a traditional grid of questions
  • Template is pre-built for the vacation/travel-preferences use case
  • Mobile-friendly conversational format suited to shorter preference surveys

物足りない点

  • Conversational UI is a display style, not true adaptive AI questioning based on prior answers
  • No pricing sensitivity methodology (e.g., Van Westendorp) or destination trade-off analysis (e.g., MaxDiff) included
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative report of respondent stories

QuestionPro

Travel survey questions | Travel questionnaire

A broader travel questionnaire/survey-questions resource rather than a single narrowly-scoped vacation planning-and-satisfaction template — it reads more like a question bank and template hub than one fielding-ready instrument. Useful as a reference for question ideas, but requires assembly into a coherent survey flow.

優れている点

  • Large question-bank style resource covering various travel research angles
  • Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey logic and reporting platform
  • Useful as a starting reference for teams building their own travel questionnaire

物足りない点

  • Presented as a general question library/template hub rather than one purpose-built vacation satisfaction survey with a defined flow
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up to dig into an individual trip's story
  • No built-in Van Westendorp pricing or MaxDiff trade-off modules specific to vacation decision-making

よくあるご質問

「Vacation Travel Planning & Satisfaction Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We're researching how people plan and experience vacation travel. Your responses are completely confidential and ano…」・「In the last 12 months, how many leisure trips of 2+ nights have you taken?」・「How did you book most of your most recent vacation trip?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Public Trust & Adoption of Self-Driving Cars

Measures how much people trust, understand, and would actually use self-driving cars — covering safety concerns, pricing sensitivity for autonomous features, and adoption triggers. The AI follow-up interview digs into the real reasoning behind each respondent's trust score instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Post-Trip Travel Experience Feedback Survey

Captures how a trip actually went — booking experience, on-trip satisfaction, value for money, and likelihood to return or recommend — for hotels, tour operators, and travel platforms. The AI follow-up interview digs into the single best or worst moment of the trip to surface what operators should keep doing or fix next.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Business Travel Experience & Policy Satisfaction Survey

Measures how employees experience booking, policy, and support for company travel — flights, hotels, expense reimbursement, and duty of care — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs exactly what went wrong on a recent trip instead of a vague complaint. Built for HR, travel management, and finance teams evaluating their travel program.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Tour Booking Experience & Decision Drivers Survey

Captures how travelers discovered, compared, and booked a tour — including pricing perception, friction points in the checkout flow, and what almost stopped them from booking. An AI follow-up reconstructs the actual booking journey step by step, surfacing friction that closed-ended ratings miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Leisure Travel Behavior & Preferences Survey

Measures leisure travelers' trip frequency, destination decision drivers, transportation preferences, satisfaction, and likelihood to recommend — providing actionable segmentation and experience insights for travel brands, tourism boards, or academic research.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Resort Stay Experience Evaluation Survey

Captures how guests rate every stage of a resort stay — booking, check-in, rooms, amenities, staff, and value — and benchmarks loyalty with a recommendation score. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moments that drove each guest's score, surfacing what turned a detractor sour or what would push a passive guest into a promoter. Built for resort GMs and hospitality research teams.

テンプレートを見る