Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Program and Session Participant Feedback Survey
Captures how participants experienced a workshop, training, or program — satisfaction, perceived value of specific sessions, and likelihood to return — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their ratings so organizers know exactly what to keep, fix, or cut next time.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how satisfied were you with the program?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend this program to a colleague or friend?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q04
マトリクス必須
Please rate each aspect of the program.
5行 × 5列
- Relevance of content to your goals
- Facilitator/presenter effectiveness
- Pacing and length
- Quality of materials or resources provided
- Organization and logistics (venue, platform, scheduling)
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
選択式必須
Which session or module did you find most valuable? (Replace with your actual session/module list before launching.)
- (Session A name)
- (Session B name)
- (Session C name)
- (Session D name)
Q06
ランク付け
If we ran this program again, rank these possible topics by how much you'd want to see them covered, from most to least wanted. (Template note: replace with topics relevant to your program.)
- (Topic A)
- (Topic B)
- (Topic C)
- (Topic D)
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
選択式必須
Did the program meet the goals you had going in?
- Fully met my goals
- Partially met my goals
- Did not meet my goals
- I didn't have a specific goal
Q08
AIインタビュー
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's satisfaction rating and whether the program met their goals. If they said it only partially or did not meet their goals, find out specifically what was missing or fell short and what would have closed that gap. If they rated it highly, find out which specific moment, session, or interaction made the biggest difference for them. Anchor on concrete details (a specific session, exercise, or interaction) rather than general impressions.
Q09
自由回答（長文）
Is there anything you'd suggest we change, add, or remove for future programs?
Q10
選択式
How likely are you to participate in a future program like this one?
- Very likely
- Somewhat likely
- Not sure
- Somewhat unlikely
- Very unlikely
Q11
選択式
Which best describes your role or level of experience with this type of program? (Replace with categories relevant to your audience.)
- First-time participant
- Returning participant
- Team lead or manager
- Subject matter expert
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
That's everything — thank you for sharing your feedback! Your responses will be reviewed by the program team to shape improvements for the next session.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Pairs standard satisfaction and recommendation ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the reasoning behind each participant's satisfaction score, not just the number itself
- Includes a matrix rating of specific program aspects plus a ranking question so organizers can see which topics participants actually want more of next time
- Captures role/experience level and likelihood of future participation alongside open-ended suggestions, giving organizers segmented, decision-ready feedback
- Auto-generates a report from the combined structured ratings and AI-probed open responses, so 'what to keep, fix, or cut' is synthesized rather than left in raw text
Jotform
Participant training session feedback Form TemplateA static, fielding-ready form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, aimed at collecting feedback on training sessions. It's easy to customize with standard fields but relies entirely on fixed questions with no dynamic follow-up. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering the 'why' behind ratings.
優れている点
- Ready to deploy quickly with Jotform's drag-and-drop customization
- Backed by a large, mature form template library and integrations ecosystem
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed question set regardless of their answers
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
SurveySparrow
Participant Feedback Form TemplateA conversational-style, fielding-ready template designed for a friendlier one-question-at-a-time feel. It covers standard participant feedback fields but the flow is still pre-scripted rather than adaptively generated per response. Works well for basic satisfaction capture without deep reasoning follow-up.
優れている点
- Conversational UI intended to feel more engaging than a plain form
- Fielding-ready template usable out of the box for events/programs
物足りない点
- Conversational tone does not equate to adaptive AI follow-up — questions remain static and pre-written
- No documented per-response quality scoring or AI-generated synthesis report
Typeform
Post-Program Feedback Form TemplateA polished, fielding-ready template using Typeform's signature single-question conversational format for post-program feedback. It's strong on presentation and completion-friendly design but the question sequence is authored in advance, not generated from the respondent's own answers. No voice interview or guided task option.
優れている点
- Clean, engaging one-question-at-a-time interface known to improve completion rates
- Simple to brand and customize for a specific program
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI or voice interview capability to probe individual reasoning behind ratings
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring
QuestionPro
Seminar feedback & attendee information survey questions + Sample questionnaire templateThis page reads primarily as a guide with sample seminar feedback questions rather than a single ready-to-field survey — useful as inspiration for question wording but requiring assembly before deployment. It covers attendee information and seminar-specific satisfaction items broadly. No adaptive interview element is present.
優れている点
- Offers a broad bank of sample questions covering seminar logistics and attendee info
- Useful reference for question wording across multiple seminar feedback angles
物足りない点
- Presented as a sample question guide/blog-style resource rather than a turnkey fielding-ready template
- No adaptive AI follow-up, voice interview, or automated quality scoring built into the questions listed
よくあるご質問
「Program and Session Participant Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking part! We'd love your honest feedback on the program so we can make the next one better. Your responses…」・「Overall, how satisfied were you with the program?」・「How likely are you to recommend this program to a colleague or friend?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。