QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Grant Application Process Experience Survey

Captures how applicants experienced your grant application process — from finding guidelines to hearing back on a decision — for foundations, government agencies, and grant-making bodies. An AI follow-up interview digs into the exact stage that caused the most friction, so program teams know precisely what to fix before the next funding cycle.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for applying for funding with us! We'd like to hear about your experience with the grant application process — from finding the guidelines to hearing back on a decision. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This takes about 5 minutes and helps us make the process easier for future applicants.

Q02
選択式必須

Have you applied for a grant with us before?

  • This was my first time applying
  • I've applied 1-2 times before
  • I've applied 3 or more times before
Q03
選択式必須

What was the outcome of your most recent application?

  • Funded
  • Not funded
  • Still under review
  • Withdrew application
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How clear were the eligibility requirements and guidelines before you started your application?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not clear at all最大:Extremely clear
Q05
マトリクス必須

Please rate each part of the application process.

5行 × 5列
  • Finding the application guidelines
  • Completing the application form
  • Gathering required documents and attachments
  • Communication during the review period
  • Receiving the funding decision
列: Very poor · Poor · Fair · Good · Very good
Q06
選択式必須

How would you describe the amount of time it took to complete the full application?

  • Much too long
  • Somewhat too long
  • About right
  • Somewhat too short
  • Much too short
Q07
評価スケール必須

Overall, how would you rate your experience with our grant application process?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q08
AIインタビュー

Identify the single stage of the application process (guidelines, form completion, documentation, review communication, or decision notification) that was most frustrating for this respondent, and reconstruct specifically what went wrong and what they expected instead. If they rated the overall experience highly, probe what almost went wrong or could still be improved. If they were not funded, explore whether the rejection communication was clear enough for them to understand why and what to do differently next time.

Q09
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend applying for funding from us to a peer organization?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q10
自由回答（長文）

What's the one change that would most improve the grant application process for future applicants?

Q11
選択式

What type of organization do you represent?

  • Nonprofit or charity
  • Educational institution
  • Government agency
  • For-profit business
  • Individual applicant
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What is your organization's annual operating budget?

  • Under $100,000
  • $100,000–$499,999
  • $500,000–$999,999
  • $1 million–$4.9 million
  • $5 million or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your feedback goes directly into improving our grant application process and communications for future applicants.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that digs into whichever stage (guidelines, form completion, review wait, decision communication) actually caused friction for that specific applicant, rather than relying on generic ratings alone
  • Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale on guideline clarity, a matrix rating each process stage, an overall experience rating, and a recommendation likelihood score) with open-ended and adaptive follow-up so program teams get both benchmarkable scores and specific root causes
  • Captures applicant context (repeat vs. first-time applicant, application outcome, organization type, and annual operating budget) so friction points can be segmented by applicant profile before the next funding cycle
  • Closes with a direct improvement question and a thank-you message, framing the survey as feedback on the applicant experience rather than as another form to fill out

Jotform

Student Grant Application Form Template

This is a form for collecting new grant applications (student-focused), not a survey about the applicant's experience with the process. It's a fielding-ready form builder template, useful for intake but not for post-application feedback. Relevant only as a reference point for the grant space, not a direct feedback-survey competitor.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use, customizable form builder with drag-and-drop fields
  • Likely supports file uploads and conditional logic common to Jotform templates
  • Free tier available for basic form deployment

物足りない点

  • Designed for collecting applications, not for measuring applicant satisfaction or friction points
  • No adaptive follow-up questioning to identify which stage caused problems
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring or automated experience reporting

SurveyMonkey

Grant Application Form Template

Positioned as a form for intaking grant applications rather than a survey capturing how applicants experienced that process end-to-end. It offers SurveyMonkey's standard static question library and reporting dashboards. Solid for straightforward data collection but not built to probe applicant pain points.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with broad question-type library
  • Standard analytics and reporting dashboards
  • Easy to deploy without technical setup

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI interview to pinpoint the specific friction stage
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • Reporting is templated analytics, not an automatically generated narrative report tied to individual responses

よくあるご質問

「Grant Application Process Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for applying for funding with us! We'd like to hear about your experience with the grant application process — fr…」・「Have you applied for a grant with us before?」・「What was the outcome of your most recent application?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Big Game Day Fan Quiz & Ad Engagement Survey

A fun, quiz-style survey for sports marketers, broadcasters, and brands to gauge fan excitement, viewing habits, and commercial/halftime engagement around the year's biggest televised game. The AI follow-up reconstructs the specific ad or moment a fan actually remembers, not just whether they say ads matter.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Scholarship Application Experience Survey

Captures how applicants experienced your scholarship's application process — from discovery through submission — including clarity, effort, and sticking points. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest obstacle each applicant hit, so program staff know exactly what to fix before the next cycle.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Loan Application Experience Survey

Measures how applicants experienced your loan process — from submitting documents to hearing a decision — covering clarity, speed, effort, and satisfaction. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the exact moment the process broke down for frustrated, denied, or low-effort applicants, giving lenders concrete fixes instead of vague complaints.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Candidate Experience & Recruitment Process Feedback

Captures how candidates experienced your hiring process — from application through offer or rejection — covering communication, timeliness, interview quality, and fairness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped a candidate's willingness to recommend applying to your company. Built for talent acquisition teams auditing their funnel.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Job Application Experience Feedback Survey

Captures how candidates experience your job application process — from finding the posting to hitting submit — covering clarity, length, and communication. Built for recruiting and HR teams, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment an applicant almost gave up or felt confused, rather than just averaging satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Job Application & Candidate Experience Survey

Captures how candidates actually experienced your hiring process, from finding the posting through interviews, communication, and outcome. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single moment that most shaped their impression of your company, surfacing friction that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for talent acquisition and HR teams benchmarking or improving their pipeline.

テンプレートを見る