QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Scholarship Application Experience Survey

Captures how applicants experienced your scholarship's application process — from discovery through submission — including clarity, effort, and sticking points. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest obstacle each applicant hit, so program staff know exactly what to fix before the next cycle.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for applying to the (Replace with scholarship program name) scholarship! We'd love your honest feedback on the application process so we can make it easier for future applicants. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This takes about 5 minutes. (Template note: replace the scholarship name before launching.)

Q02
選択式必須

How did you first hear about this scholarship?

  • School counselor or teacher
  • Search engine or online ad
  • Social media
  • Friend or family member
  • Community organization or nonprofit
  • Employer
  • Other
Q03
選択式必須

Which best describes where you ended up with this application?

  • Started it but did not finish
  • Completed and submitted, still waiting to hear back
  • Submitted and was awarded
  • Submitted but was not awarded
Q04
評価スケール必須

How clear were the eligibility requirements and instructions before you started?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very confusing最大:Very clear
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how easy or difficult was it to complete this application from start to finish?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Extremely difficult最大:Extremely easy
Q06
マトリクス必須

Please rate each part of the application process.

5行 × 5列
  • Online application portal or form
  • Essay or personal statement prompts
  • Gathering required documents (transcripts, letters, etc.)
  • Deadline reminders and communications
  • Responsiveness of scholarship staff
列: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q07
選択式必須

What was the single biggest obstacle to completing this application?

  • Gathering required documents or letters
  • Understanding the essay prompts
  • Technical issues with the online portal
  • Finding enough time to complete it
  • Meeting the deadline
  • Cost or access issues (e.g., needing transcripts, notary)
  • Nothing was difficult
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct exactly what happened around the biggest obstacle the respondent selected: what specifically went wrong or felt hard, at what point in the process it occurred, and how (or whether) they resolved it. If they said 'nothing was difficult,' probe what made this application stand out as smooth compared to others they've completed. Anchor follow-ups on concrete moments, not general impressions, and ask what single change would have made the biggest difference.

Q09
ポイント配分

Thinking about your decision to apply, distribute 100 points across these factors based on how much each influenced you.

  • Financial need
  • Award amount
  • How easy the application looked
  • Reputation or prestige of the scholarship
  • Encouragement from a counselor, teacher, or family member
  • Deadline timing relative to other applications
100ポイントを配分
Q10
ランク付け

Rank these support resources by how helpful they were (or would have been) while applying.

  1. FAQ or help page
  2. Email or phone support from staff
  3. Info session or webinar
  4. Sample essays or example applications
  5. Peer or mentor advice
  6. I did not use any support resources
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q11
選択式

What is your current field of study or intended major?

  • STEM (science, tech, engineering, math)
  • Business or economics
  • Arts or humanities
  • Social sciences
  • Health sciences
  • Undecided
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Are you the first person in your immediate family to attend college?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your experience! Your feedback goes directly to our scholarship team and will shape improvements to the application process for future applicants.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened around each applicant's single biggest obstacle, rather than stopping at a static multiple-choice answer.
  • Uses a matrix question to rate each distinct stage of the application process (not just one overall satisfaction score), plus a constant-sum question that forces respondents to trade off the factors behind their decision to apply.
  • Adds a ranking question on support resources and screens for first-generation college status and field of study, so program staff can see whether specific applicant segments hit different sticking points.
  • Opens and closes with plain chat messages that frame the survey as feedback on the process (not another application form), which keeps completion rates and honesty higher for a post-submission experience survey.

Jotform

100+ Scholarship Application Forms

This is a category/gallery page listing 100+ scholarship application form templates rather than a single fielding-ready survey. The templates on it are built to collect applicant data (name, essays, transcripts) for selection purposes, not to measure how applicants experienced the process.

優れている点

  • Large library of ready-made form templates to start from
  • Drag-and-drop builder with broad file-upload and e-signature support common to Jotform forms
  • Wide integration ecosystem for routing submissions

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — templates are static field-collection forms
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated analysis of applicant obstacles
  • Page is a template gallery, not a single evaluable survey instrument

SurveyMonkey

Scholarship Application Form Template

A single, ready-to-field template for collecting scholarship applications rather than post-application experience feedback. It's built around SurveyMonkey's standard survey-taking interface and reporting dashboards.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with familiar analytics/reporting dashboards
  • Simple to launch and share for a single application form
  • Question logic and branching available for basic skip patterns

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to probe into a specific reported obstacle
  • No published prompt-level methodology for how any AI features (if present) generate follow-ups
  • Fixed question set focused on intake, not on diagnosing process friction

SurveySparrow

Online Scholarship Application Form Template

A conversational-style template aimed at collecting scholarship applications, not at surveying applicants about their experience with the process afterward. It leans on SurveySparrow's chat-like form UI for a friendlier intake experience.

優れている点

  • Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI that can feel less form-like
  • Mobile-friendly presentation
  • Part of a broader survey platform with reporting tools

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into a specific obstacle an applicant selected
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • Static template structure, not designed to surface process-improvement insights for staff

Typeform

Scholarship Application Form Template

A polished, conversational scholarship application intake form, not an experience/feedback survey. It's built for collecting applicant information with Typeform's signature clean design.

優れている点

  • Clean, well-regarded conversational design that can improve completion of intake forms
  • Easy embedding on program websites
  • Logic jumps for basic conditional intake questions

物足りない点

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview or voice interview option
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology
  • Template is intake-focused, with no built-in mechanism to surface or rank applicants' biggest process obstacles

よくあるご質問

「Scholarship Application Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for applying to the (Replace with scholarship program name) scholarship! We'd love your honest feedback on the ap…」・「How did you first hear about this scholarship?」・「Which best describes where you ended up with this application?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

New Client Intake & Project Scoping Survey

Gathers what a prospective client needs, why it matters now, and how ready they are to move forward — built for agencies, consultants, and professional services firms onboarding new business. The AI follow-up interview digs past the surface request to uncover the real problem, constraints, and definition of success behind it.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Grant Application Process Experience Survey

Captures how applicants experienced your grant application process — from finding guidelines to hearing back on a decision — for foundations, government agencies, and grant-making bodies. An AI follow-up interview digs into the exact stage that caused the most friction, so program teams know precisely what to fix before the next funding cycle.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Internship Application Candidate Experience Survey

Captures how candidates experienced your internship application process — from finding the posting through interviews and final decision — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that made the experience feel smooth or frustrating. Built for HR and university recruiting teams who want to fix funnel drop-off before it costs them strong candidates.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Loan Application Experience Survey

Measures how applicants experienced your loan process — from submitting documents to hearing a decision — covering clarity, speed, effort, and satisfaction. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the exact moment the process broke down for frustrated, denied, or low-effort applicants, giving lenders concrete fixes instead of vague complaints.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Job Application Experience Feedback Survey

Captures how candidates experience your job application process — from finding the posting to hitting submit — covering clarity, length, and communication. Built for recruiting and HR teams, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment an applicant almost gave up or felt confused, rather than just averaging satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Job Application & Candidate Experience Survey

Captures how candidates actually experienced your hiring process, from finding the posting through interviews, communication, and outcome. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single moment that most shaped their impression of your company, surfacing friction that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for talent acquisition and HR teams benchmarking or improving their pipeline.

テンプレートを見る