Q01
メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートEducation & Academic
Teacher Performance and Classroom Experience Evaluation
Captures how students experience a teacher's clarity, fairness, feedback, and engagement using a rating battery and a best-worst trade-off on what matters most, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their lowest rating instead of a vague complaint. Built for course or semester-end teacher evaluations.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全12問・約7分
Q02
選択式
Including this term, how many classes have you taken with this teacher?
- This is my first
- Two
- Three
- Four or more
Q03
マトリクス必須
How much do you agree with each statement about this teacher?
5行 × 5列
- Explains concepts clearly
- Is fair and unbiased in grading
- Encourages questions and participation
- Provides timely feedback on assignments
- Manages class time effectively
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須
Overall, how effective is this teacher at helping you learn the material?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not effective at all最大:Extremely effective
Q05
選択式
In the last month, how often did this teacher respond when you asked for help outside of class (email, office hours, messages)?
- Never asked
- Never responded
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Every time I asked
Q06
評価スケール必須
How clear were this teacher's grading criteria and expectations for assignments?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
For each set, pick which quality matters most and which matters least to your learning in this teacher's class.
- Explains material clearly
- Is approachable and available for help
- Grades fairly
- Gives useful feedback on work
- Makes the subject interesting
- Manages the classroom effectively
- Is well organized and prepared
- Cares about student success
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須
How likely are you to recommend this teacher's class to another student?
スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー
Identify the statement the respondent rated lowest in the earlier agreement battery (or the aspect behind a low overall effectiveness score) and get a specific, recent example of it happening in class — what occurred, how it affected their learning, and whether it was a one-time issue or a pattern. If everything was rated highly, probe what this teacher does that other teachers don't, anchored on a concrete classroom moment.
Q10
自由回答（長文）
Is there anything specific this teacher could do differently to help you learn better?
Q11
選択式
What grade or year level are you in?
- 9th grade
- 10th grade
- 11th grade
- 12th grade
- College/University
- Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ
Thank you for the thoughtful feedback! Responses are combined with other students' answers into a summary report shared with school leadership to support this teacher's development.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Uses a rating and agreement-statement battery to establish where a teacher is weakest, then triggers an AI follow-up interview specifically on the statement the student rated lowest, replacing vague written complaints with a concrete moment
- Includes a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off exercise so results show which qualities (clarity, fairness, feedback, engagement) matter most to students' learning rather than just raw averages
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale effectiveness, recommendation likelihood, grading-clarity rating) with an open-ended 'what could this teacher do differently' question and a targeted AI probe for richer, actionable qualitative detail
- Transparent about what's being asked and why, with a short intro/outro message framing the survey as ~5 minutes and confirming responses will be aggregated with other students'
QuestionPro
Course evaluation sample questions and survey templateA course/teacher evaluation template with sample questions covering instructor effectiveness and course quality, aimed at academic institutions. It's a static question set you can adapt, not an interactive interview. Good starting point for standard Likert-style course evaluations but leaves qualitative depth to open-text fields alone.
優れている点
- Purpose-built for academic course/teacher evaluation context
- Provides sample questions covering both course and instructor dimensions
- Backed by a broader survey platform with reporting/analytics tools
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe a student's specific lowest-rated experience
- No built-in trade-off (best-worst) method to rank which teaching qualities matter most
- No published methodology for how open-ended responses are scored or summarized
SurveyMonkey
Teacher Evaluation Survey TemplateSurveyMonkey's teacher evaluation template targets high school settings and offers a ready-to-use question set on teaching quality. It's a conventional static form relying on multiple choice and rating scales, with no mechanism to dig deeper into a specific low rating. Useful for quick deployment but limited for uncovering the story behind a poor score.
優れている点
- Well-known, easy-to-deploy survey builder with broad distribution options
- Template is pre-built specifically for high school teacher evaluation
- Likely includes standard reporting/analytics dashboards
物足りない点
- Fixed question flow with no adaptive interview to follow up on a student's lowest rating
- No best-worst trade-off question type to prioritize which teacher qualities matter most
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Typeform
Free Teacher & Course Evaluation Form TemplateTypeform offers a conversational-style teacher and course evaluation form with a clean, one-question-at-a-time UI. It's a static template with no branching logic tied to a respondent's specific answers, so a low rating doesn't trigger any deeper questioning. Good for a pleasant respondent experience but not for structured qualitative follow-up.
優れている点
- Polished, conversational form UI that can improve completion rates
- Free template available, lowering barrier to entry
- Covers both course and teacher evaluation angles in one template
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option to explore a specific complaint
- No max-diff/trade-off question to identify which qualities matter most to students
- No automated quality scoring of responses or transparent AI prompt disclosure
よくあるご質問
「Teacher Performance and Classroom Experience Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Hi! We'd like your honest feedback on this teacher's class. It takes about 5 minutes, your answers are confidential, and…」・「Including this term, how many classes have you taken with this teacher?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about this teacher?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。