すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Hybrid Work Effectiveness Pulse Survey

A 4-week pulse instrument measuring how tools, workspaces, and team norms support hybrid work. Designed for HR, People Ops, or Workplace teams to identify friction points and prioritize improvements across distributed teams.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全21問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the Hybrid Work Pulse Survey. This short survey (approximately 10 minutes) asks about your experience with tools, workspaces, and team norms over the last 4 weeks. Your responses will help us identify what's working well and where we can improve. • Participation is voluntary — you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers; we want your honest opinions. • All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. • Results will be reviewed by the People & Workplace team. Please click 'Next' to begin.

Q02
選択式

Which of the following best describes your current work pattern?

  • Fully remote (0 days on-site)
  • Hybrid: 1–2 days on-site per week
  • Hybrid: 3 days on-site per week
  • Hybrid: 4 days on-site per week
  • Fully on-site (5 days per week)
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how effective has the company's toolset been for your work in the last 4 weeks?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all effective最大:Extremely effective
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How clear were your team's communication norms (e.g., which channels to use, expected response times) in the last 4 weeks?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q05
選択式

When you were on-site in the last 4 weeks, how often could you find a suitable workspace?

  • Always
  • Often
  • Sometimes
  • Rarely
  • Never
  • I was not on-site in the last 4 weeks
Q06
ランク付け

From the list below, rank the top 3 changes that would most improve your hybrid work experience.

  1. Standardize toolset and reduce overlap
  2. Improve meeting room AV and booking systems
  3. Fewer or shorter meetings
  4. Clearer team norms and communication SLAs
  5. Stronger async documentation habits
  6. Tool training or office hours
  7. Home office equipment or stipend support
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
自由回答(長文)

If you could make one change to improve your hybrid work experience, what would it be?

Q08
プルダウン

Which department or function do you primarily work in?

  • Engineering
  • Product
  • Design
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support
  • Operations
  • HR/People
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • IT
  • Other/Multiple
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will be reviewed by the People & Workplace team and used to improve our hybrid work practices. Results will be shared in aggregate form only. If you have urgent concerns, please contact your manager or the People team directly.

Q10
プルダウン

In a typical 2-week period during the last 4 weeks, approximately how many days were you on-site?

  • 0 days
  • 1 day
  • 2 days
  • 3 days
  • 4 days
  • 5 days
  • 6 days
  • 7 days
  • 8 days
  • 9 days
  • 10 days
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate your experience with video conferencing tools in the last 4 weeks?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q12
オピニオンスケール

In the last 4 weeks, to what extent was your meeting time manageable?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all manageable最大:Completely manageable
Q13
選択式

When you were on-site in the last 4 weeks, how sufficient was access to meeting rooms with reliable AV equipment?

  • Always sufficient
  • Often sufficient
  • Sometimes sufficient
  • Rarely sufficient
  • Never sufficient
  • I was not on-site in the last 4 weeks
Q14
AIインタビュー

Thank you for your responses so far. We'd like to explore your hybrid work experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your answers.

Q15
選択式

What is your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leader (Director/VP/C-level)
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate your experience with async messaging and collaboration tools (e.g., Slack, Teams chat) in the last 4 weeks?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q17
選択式

Does your team use defined core hours for real-time collaboration?

  • Yes, consistent daily core hours
  • Yes, on some days each week
  • No, fully flexible scheduling
  • I don't know
Q18
選択式

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q19
オピニオンスケール

How would you rate your experience with document collaboration and knowledge management tools in the last 4 weeks?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q20
選択式

What is your primary work region?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Other/Multiple
Q21
選択式

Which of the following issues, if any, most affected your productivity in the last 4 weeks? (Select up to 3)

  • Slow or unreliable VPN/remote access
  • Overlapping or redundant tools
  • Permissions or access problems
  • Too many or too-long meetings
  • Time zone coordination challenges
  • Unclear norms for channels or response times
  • Insufficient documentation or knowledge base
  • Hardware or home internet/connectivity issues
  • Noise or distractions on-site
  • Difficulty finding available rooms
  • None of the above

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Structured as a recurring 4-week pulse instrument (not a one-time form), with explicit questions on toolset effectiveness, video conferencing, async messaging, and document collaboration separately rated
  • Includes a ranking question for prioritizing the top 3 improvements plus an open-text question, giving both quantifiable priority data and qualitative detail
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview segment after the core questions to probe deeper into specific hybrid work friction points that a static question set can't capture
  • Captures department, role level, tenure, and region so People Ops can segment friction points by team and location rather than relying on one aggregate score

Jotform

Remote or Hybrid Working Arrangement Form

This is a static intake/request form for documenting or approving an employee's hybrid work arrangement, not a recurring instrument for measuring hybrid work effectiveness over time. It's useful for HR administrative purposes (e.g., capturing schedule preferences) but doesn't assess tool satisfaction, meeting load, or workspace friction the way a pulse survey does. Good as a customizable form builder output, but not fielding-ready for effectiveness measurement.

優れている点

  • Simple, ready-to-use form structure for capturing basic hybrid arrangement details
  • Jotform's drag-and-drop builder makes it easy to customize fields without technical setup
  • Suited for one-time HR documentation or policy compliance workflows

物足りない点

  • Static field set with no adaptive follow-up questioning based on responses
  • Not designed as a repeatable pulse instrument, so it can't track effectiveness trends over weeks
  • No built-in scoring, automated reporting, or interview-style probing of open responses

よくあるご質問

「Hybrid Work Effectiveness Pulse Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the Hybrid Work Pulse Survey. This short survey (approximately 10 minutes) asks about your experience with to…」・「Which of the following best describes your current work pattern?」・「Overall, how effective has the company's toolset been for your work in the last 4 weeks?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る