QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Interactive Story Engagement & Choice Satisfaction Survey

Measures how readers or players experienced a branching narrative — engagement, satisfaction with the choices offered, and pull toward replaying alternate paths. Built for interactive fiction studios, narrative game teams, and branching-content publishers, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific choice moment to reveal whether decisions actually felt like they mattered.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for going through the story with us! We'd love to hear how the experience felt and whether your choices seemed to matter. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 8 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

Where did you experience (Replace with story title) — the interactive story we're asking about? (Template note: replace with your title/platform list before launching.)

  • Mobile app
  • Web browser
  • Interactive e-book / e-reader
  • VR or console game
  • In-person / live event
  • Other
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How engaged did you feel while going through the story?

スケール: 1 – 10
最小:Not engaged at all最大:Completely absorbed
Q04
選択式

How many different endings or major story branches do you think you explored?

  • Just one
  • Two
  • Three or four
  • Five or more
  • Not sure — the branching wasn't clear
Q05
マトリクス必須

Rate the following elements of the story you experienced.

5行 × 5列
  • Plot / overall storyline
  • Character depth
  • How much your choices affected the outcome
  • Pacing
  • Dialogue and writing quality
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

For an interactive story like this, which of these matter most to your enjoyment, and which matter least?

  • Choices that meaningfully change the plot
  • Depth of character relationships
  • Surprising plot twists
  • Visual and audio design
  • Value in replaying for other paths
  • Overall length of the story
  • How hard the decisions are to make
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q07
評価スケール必須

How satisfied were you with how much your choices actually shaped the story's outcome?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this interactive story to a friend?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct one specific choice moment the respondent remembers clearly: what the decision was, what they expected to happen, and what actually happened next. Probe whether that moment felt like it truly changed the story or felt scripted regardless of their pick, and anchor on their emotional reaction. If they rated choice-impact low on the earlier rating, dig into which specific decision felt the most pointless.

Q10
選択式

Would you replay this story to see a different path or ending?

  • Yes, definitely
  • Maybe, if I had time
  • Probably not
  • No
Q11
自由回答（長文）

What's one thing you'd change about how the choices or branching worked?

Q12
選択式

How often do you engage with interactive stories, branching narrative games, or choice-based fiction?

  • Weekly or more
  • A few times a month
  • A few times a year
  • This was my first one
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

What's your age range? (optional)

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55+
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for sharing your experience! Your answers will help us shape which choices and branches feel worth building next.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs one specific choice moment the respondent remembers, revealing whether decisions actually felt consequential — not just a static rating
  • Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale for engagement, rating for choice satisfaction, matrix for story elements, max-diff for enjoyment drivers) with open-ended probing in one flow
  • Captures replay intent and branch-exploration behavior alongside a long-text question on what respondents would change about the branching
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean narrative teams get a readable summary without manually coding open-ended answers

SurveySparrow

Interactive Story Template | Choose Your Own Adventure

This is a fielding-ready template built around a choose-your-own-adventure survey format, aimed at event and marketing use cases rather than narrative/game studios specifically. It's a static question set with SurveySparrow's conversational UI styling, not an adaptive interview. Good for quick deployment, but it won't dig into why a specific choice felt meaningful.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built branching template with a conversational, story-like survey presentation
  • Likely quick to set up and customize given SurveySparrow's template library approach
  • Fits general choose-your-own-adventure use cases, not limited to any one industry

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — cannot dynamically reconstruct or probe a specific choice moment a respondent remembers
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share task capability
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

よくあるご質問

「Interactive Story Engagement & Choice Satisfaction Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for going through the story with us! We'd love to hear how the experience felt and whether your choices seemed to…」・「Where did you experience (Replace with story title) — the interactive story we're asking about? (Template note: replace…」・「How engaged did you feel while going through the story?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Photography Session Booking Experience Survey

Captures how clients found, evaluated, and booked a photography session — from discovery channel and pricing perception to friction points in scheduling and contracts. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the actual decision journey, surfacing what nearly made a client choose someone else and where the booking process could lose future bookings.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Magazine Reader Engagement & Content Satisfaction Survey

Measures how readers actually consume a magazine — print or digital — how satisfied they are with specific sections, and which content types they'd trade off against each other. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each reader's satisfaction or recommendation score, surfacing the specific articles, sections, or frustrations that closed questions miss.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Entertainment Chatbot Engagement & Satisfaction Survey

Measures how often people use an entertainment chatbot (companionship, roleplay, humor, storytelling), what keeps them coming back, and where the experience falls flat — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific memorable conversation to surface what actually made it feel fun, believable, or disappointing. Built for product and content teams shipping character or entertainment-focused AI experiences.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Reading Habits & Genre Interest Survey

Measures how often people read, which formats and genres they gravitate toward, and what drives their book choices — built for publishers, bookstores, libraries, and content platforms. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real decision behind a recent book pick or drop-off, not just the stated preference.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Reader Satisfaction and Content Value Survey

Measures how satisfied readers are with your publication's accuracy, depth, timeliness, and relevance, and which content types they value most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each reader's satisfaction rating so editorial and product teams know what to fix or double down on.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Student Interest in Course Topics and Activities Survey

Measures which topics, formats, and learning activities genuinely capture student curiosity versus which ones fall flat, for instructors and instructional designers refining a course or program. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment interest sparked or died, surfacing detail that ratings alone can't reveal.

テンプレートを見る