すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Meeting Effectiveness & Culture Pulse Survey

Measures how employees actually experience the meetings on their calendar — frequency, agenda discipline, time well spent, and what they'd fix first — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific meeting that felt like a waste of time and what would have made it worth attending.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this — ironically, about meetings. We want an honest read on how meeting time is being spent so we can fix what isn't working. About 8 minutes, and your answers are anonymous to your team lead.

Q02
選択式必須

In a typical week, how many meetings do you attend?

  • 0-2
  • 3-5
  • 6-10
  • 11-15
  • More than 15
Q03
マトリクス必須

How often is each of these true of the meetings you attend?

5行 × 5列
  • Meetings start on time
  • Meetings have a clear agenda shared in advance
  • The right people are in the room
  • Meetings end with clear action items
  • My time in the meeting feels well spent
列: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Always
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how effective are the meetings you attend at helping you do your job?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not effective at all最大:Extremely effective
Q05
選択式必須

In the last month, how often have you felt you could have skipped a meeting without missing anything important?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Almost always
Q06
ランク付け必須

If you could only fix a few things about meetings here, rank these from most to least important to fix first.

  1. Fewer meetings overall
  2. Shorter meetings
  3. Clearer agendas
  4. Better facilitation
  5. More relevant attendees
  6. More actionable follow-up
  7. Better use of technology/tools
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
ポイント配分

Thinking about a typical 8 minutes meeting you attend, how would you ideally like that time allocated? Split 100 points across these.

  • Sharing status/updates
  • Open discussion and debate
  • Decision-making
  • Problem-solving
  • Relationship building/small talk
100ポイントを配分
Q08
選択式

Which meeting format do you personally find most productive?

  • In-person
  • Video call
  • Phone/audio only
  • Hybrid (some in-person, some remote)
  • No strong preference
Q09
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent to describe one specific recent meeting that felt like a poor use of their time: what it was about, who was there, and what actually happened versus what they expected. Probe concretely for what made it ineffective (agenda, attendees, length, follow-through) and what single change would have made it worth attending. If they say all their meetings are fine, ask them instead to describe their single most valuable recent meeting and what made it work, then compare that to their ranking of what to fix first.

Q10
メッセージ

Almost done — just a few quick background questions to help us spot patterns across teams and tenure.

Q11
選択式

Which department are you part of?

  • Engineering
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • People/HR
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead/Manager
  • Senior manager/Director
  • Executive/VP and above
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2-5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! We're combining these ratings and AI follow-up interviews across the company into a meeting-culture report, and will use it to reset agendas, attendee lists, and cadence where it matters most.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to reconstruct one specific recent meeting that felt like a waste of time and what would have made it worth attending, surfacing concrete detail static surveys can't reach
  • Combines quantitative measures (meeting frequency, a matrix of recurring behaviors, an opinion scale on effectiveness, a ranking of fixes, and a constant-sum split of ideal meeting time use) with open qualitative depth in one flow
  • Captures department, role level, and tenure so patterns in meeting pain can be segmented across the org
  • Uses conversational conversational message framing at the start, middle, and end to keep the survey feeling human rather than like a form, which can support honest responses on a sensitive topic like wasted time

Jotform

Meeting Effectiveness Survey Form Template

A ready-to-field form template focused specifically on meeting effectiveness, which makes it a direct topical match. It's a static form builder product, so it relies on fixed questions and drag-and-drop customization rather than any adaptive interviewing. Good for quick deployment but shallow on qualitative depth.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built specifically for meeting effectiveness, not a generic pulse survey
  • Easy to customize and deploy quickly via Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Familiar, low-friction form format for respondents

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe deeper on individual answers
  • No mechanism to reconstruct a specific meeting example beyond whatever open-text field is included
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report

QuestionPro

Employee Meeting Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This page combines a sample questionnaire with surrounding guidance on meeting survey questions, making it a mix of template and reference content rather than a purely fielding-ready instrument. It's relevant to the same employee-meeting topic and offers question examples researchers can adapt. Depth is grounded in the survey platform's usual analytics dashboards rather than conversational AI interviewing.

優れている点

  • Provides sample questions and context/guidance for building an employee meeting survey
  • Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey logic and reporting dashboard features
  • Covers standard employee-meeting topics like frequency and satisfaction

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to dig into a specific bad-meeting example
  • Fixed questionnaire format with no automated quality scoring per response
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology since it isn't an AI-interview product

よくあるご質問

「Meeting Effectiveness & Culture Pulse Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes on this — ironically, about meetings. We want an honest read on how meeting time is bein…」・「In a typical week, how many meetings do you attend?」・「How often is each of these true of the meetings you attend?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る