QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Operations & Data

Meeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey

Measures how well meetings are planned, run, and followed up on — cadence, agenda discipline, and the biggest time-wasters — for teams and ops leaders auditing their meeting culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a recent unproductive meeting to surface the specific root cause behind the numbers.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how meetings actually work for you day-to-day. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no wrong answers — honest details help us fix what's broken. About 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In a typical week, how many scheduled meetings do you attend?

  • 0-2
  • 3-5
  • 6-10
  • 11-15
  • More than 15
Q03
数値必須

Roughly how many total hours per week do you spend in meetings, including recurring ones?

Q04
マトリクス必須

Thinking about the meetings you attend most often, how frequently does each of the following happen?

5行 × 5列
  • Starts within 5 minutes of the scheduled time
  • Has a clear stated objective
  • Includes only the people who actually need to be there
  • Ends with clear action items and owners
  • Could have been an email or async update instead
列: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Always
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須

In the last month, how often did meetings you attended start with a written agenda shared in advance?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Always
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these is the biggest drain on your team's meeting time, and which is the least of a problem?

  • No clear agenda or objective
  • Wrong people or too many people invited
  • Meeting runs over its scheduled time
  • No decisions or action items at the end
  • Meeting could have been an email
  • Recurring meetings that no longer add value
  • Difficulty finding a time that works for everyone
  • Lack of follow-up on previous action items
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Biggest drain on productivity最も悪い:Least of a problem
Q07
評価スケール必須

Overall, how would you rate the meeting culture at your organization?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend your team's current meeting practices to another team as a model to follow?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent to walk through the most recent meeting they attended that felt like a waste of time: what it was supposed to accomplish, what actually happened, and the single biggest reason it went sideways. Anchor on whichever pain point they rated worst in the prioritization exercise and probe whether that's a one-off or a recurring pattern. If they can't recall a specific meeting, ask them to describe what an ideal 7 minutes version of their most common recurring meeting would look like instead.

Q10
選択式

What's the ideal default length for a routine status-update or check-in meeting?

  • 15 minutes
  • 25 minutes
  • 30 minutes
  • 45 minutes
  • 60 minutes
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director
  • VP / Executive
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

Which department are you in?

  • Engineering
  • Product
  • Sales & Marketing
  • Operations
  • Customer Support
  • (Template note: replace with your organization's department list before launching.)
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed into a report on where our meeting habits are working and where they're costing people time.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through a specific recent unproductive meeting to surface the actual root cause, not just a satisfaction score
  • Combines quantitative cadence and time-cost metrics (weekly meeting count, hours spent, agenda-discipline frequency via matrix and opinion-scale questions) with a MaxDiff question that forces prioritization of the single biggest time-waster
  • Includes role-level and department breakdowns so ops leaders can segment meeting-culture ratings and recommend-likelihood by team
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean open-ended answers about 'what went wrong' are analyzed systematically rather than manually read one by one

QuestionPro

Meeting Planning Tool Survey Template

A ready-to-field template focused on meeting planning logistics (scheduling, preferences, logistics) rather than deep root-cause diagnosis of meeting dysfunction. It fits general survey-building workflows on QuestionPro's platform but doesn't focus specifically on time-waster diagnosis or follow-up culture.

優れている点

  • Fielding-ready template within an established survey platform
  • Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey logic and reporting tools
  • Likely customizable question library for meeting logistics topics

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI interview to probe why a specific meeting failed
  • No indication of automated quality scoring on open-ended responses
  • No published methodology on how questions were designed or validated

Jotform

Meeting Effectiveness Survey Form Template

A directly comparable, fielding-ready form template aimed at gauging meeting effectiveness, likely using standard rating and open-text fields. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, useful for quick deployment but not designed for adaptive follow-up questioning.

優れている点

  • Fielding-ready and easy to customize via Jotform's form builder
  • Simple, familiar form-based UX for quick respondent completion
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form and workflow ecosystem

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to reconstruct a specific unproductive meeting and surface root causes
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent prompt methodology or voice-AI interview option

よくあるご質問

「Meeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how meetings actually work for you day-to-day. Your responses are completely co…」・「In a typical week, how many scheduled meetings do you attend?」・「Roughly how many total hours per week do you spend in meetings, including recurring ones?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Operations & Data

Meeting Planning Tool Experience & Pain Points

Measures how people actually schedule, reschedule, and coordinate meetings today — time spent, satisfaction with current tools, and which features would save the most time. Built for product and operations teams evaluating or building meeting planning software. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent scheduling breakdown instead of relying on a generic satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Meeting Effectiveness & Culture Pulse Survey

Measures how employees actually experience the meetings on their calendar — frequency, agenda discipline, time well spent, and what they'd fix first — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific meeting that felt like a waste of time and what would have made it worth attending.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Meeting Effectiveness & Decision-Making Assessment

Evaluates meeting structure, facilitation quality, and decision follow-through to identify specific improvement opportunities. Designed for organization-wide or team-level deployment with results segmented by function, role level, and work arrangement.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Meeting Preparation Habits & Readiness Survey

Measures how thoroughly people prepare for meetings they lead and attend — agendas, objectives, materials, and roles — and where preparation habits break down. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific under-prepared meeting to surface the real friction behind missed prep steps, for operations teams trying to improve meeting quality.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Meeting Availability & Scheduling Preferences Survey

Maps when employees are genuinely available and willing to meet, how their meeting time actually breaks down, and where scheduling friction eats into focus work. An AI follow-up interview digs into one specific recent meeting that went wrong and what would have fixed it. Built for ops, IT, and people teams auditing meeting culture.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Post-Meeting Effectiveness & Engagement Survey

A structured feedback instrument for evaluating meeting productivity, organization, psychological safety, and environment. Designed for post-meeting deployment to identify actionable improvements for recurring team meetings.

テンプレートを見る