すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Meeting Effectiveness & Decision-Making Assessment

Evaluates meeting structure, facilitation quality, and decision follow-through to identify specific improvement opportunities. Designed for organization-wide or team-level deployment with results segmented by function, role level, and work arrangement.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全21問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome! This confidential survey asks about how your meetings are structured, facilitated, and followed through. It takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Your participation is voluntary, and there are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses will be reported in aggregate to protect your anonymity. You may stop at any time.

Q02
プルダウン

Approximately how many hours did you spend in meetings in the last 7 days?

  • 0–2 hours
  • 3–5 hours
  • 6–10 hours
  • 11–15 hours
  • 16–20 hours
  • More than 20 hours
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How often do meetings you attend have a clear agenda shared at least 24 hours in advance?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Always
Q04
オピニオンスケール

How often are decisions, owners, and next steps clearly documented by the end of your meetings?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Always
Q05
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how would you rate the effectiveness of meetings at your organization?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very ineffective最大:Very effective
Q06
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, what is one change that would make your meetings more effective?

Q07
プルダウン

What is your primary team or function?

  • Engineering
  • Product
  • Design
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Operations
  • Customer Support
  • HR / People
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Other (please specify)
Q08
メッセージ

Thank you for your time and insights! Your responses will be reviewed in aggregate to help improve how meetings are planned, facilitated, and followed through across the organization.

Q09
プルダウン

How often do you attend recurring team meetings (e.g., standups, syncs, staff meetings)?

  • Daily
  • 2–3 times a week
  • Weekly
  • Every other week
  • Monthly
  • Less often or rarely
  • Not applicable
Q10
選択式

For most recurring meetings you attend, which of the following does the agenda typically include? (Select all that apply)

  • Specific discussion topics
  • Time allocations for each topic
  • Pre-read materials or links
  • Clearly identified decision points
  • Named facilitator or meeting owner
  • Expected outcomes or goals
  • None of the above
Q11
選択式

In the last 30 days, how often were meeting decisions revisited because ownership or next steps were unclear?

  • Never
  • 1–2 times
  • 3–4 times
  • 5 or more times
  • Not applicable
Q12
ランク付け

Rank the following practices by their potential impact on your meeting effectiveness (drag to reorder, most impactful first).

  1. Clear agenda shared in advance
  2. Smaller attendee list
  3. Strong facilitator
  4. Strict timeboxing
  5. Pre-reads circulated beforehand
  6. Decision log with owners and deadlines
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q13
AIインタビュー

You mentioned areas where meetings could improve. Could you tell me more about a specific recent meeting experience that stood out — positively or negatively?

Q14
プルダウン

What is your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Director / Head
  • Executive
  • Other
Q15
オピニオンスケール

How often do meetings you attend start and end on time?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Never最大:Always
Q16
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree: Our team's meeting norms support timely decision-making.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q17
選択式

Which meeting types do you find least valuable for your work? (Select all that apply)

  • Status updates
  • Brainstorming / ideation
  • Decision-making meetings
  • One-on-ones
  • All-hands / town halls
  • Project kickoffs
  • Daily standups
  • Cross-functional syncs
  • None — all feel valuable
Q18
プルダウン

How long have you been at the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6+ years
Q19
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree: Participants in my meetings have a fair chance to contribute without interruptions.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q20
選択式

Which best describes your preference for meeting cadence?

  • Fewer but longer meetings
  • More but shorter meetings
  • Current cadence is about right
  • No strong preference
Q21
プルダウン

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • On-site mostly
  • Hybrid
  • Remote mostly

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Pairs scaled questions on agenda clarity, punctuality, and decision documentation with an open-text prompt and an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes the specific improvement area each respondent names
  • Directly measures decision follow-through (how often decisions get revisited due to unclear ownership) rather than only general meeting satisfaction
  • Segments results by function, role level, tenure, and work arrangement for organization-wide or team-level rollups
  • Includes a ranking exercise so respondents prioritize which practices would most improve effectiveness, giving actionable prioritization instead of a single satisfaction score

Jotform

Meeting Effectiveness Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use static form covering general meeting satisfaction and effectiveness questions, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a genuine fielding-ready template for this topic, but it's a fixed question set rather than a dynamic assessment instrument. No indication it segments results by function, role level, or work arrangement out of the box.

優れている点

  • Fast to deploy using Jotform's widely-used drag-and-drop builder
  • Customizable fields and branding within Jotform's ecosystem
  • Straightforward, familiar form format for respondents

物足りない点

  • Static question list with no adaptive follow-up probing based on a respondent's answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No built-in segmentation by function, role level, tenure, or work arrangement

SurveySparrow

Meeting Preparation Checklist Template

This is a checklist for planning individual meetings (agenda prep, logistics) rather than a survey instrument for assessing meeting effectiveness or decision-making across an organization. It can be distributed via SurveySparrow's conversational form format, but it does not appear designed to measure facilitation quality or decision follow-through at scale.

優れている点

  • Conversational, chat-style UI that SurveySparrow is known for
  • Simple to use for pre-meeting planning checks
  • Easy to distribute to teams before recurring meetings

物足りない点

  • Checklist format, not a scaled survey instrument measuring meeting effectiveness or decision follow-through
  • No adaptive AI interview or follow-up probing on open responses
  • No automated quality scoring or segmented reporting by function/role/work arrangement

よくあるご質問

「Meeting Effectiveness & Decision-Making Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome! This confidential survey asks about how your meetings are structured, facilitated, and followed through. It tak…」・「Approximately how many hours did you spend in meetings in the last 7 days?」・「How often do meetings you attend have a clear agenda shared at least 24 hours in advance?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る