QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Mentor Program Effectiveness Evaluation Survey

Measures how well a mentorship relationship is working for the mentee — guidance quality, meeting consistency, and career impact — with an AI follow-up that digs into a specific moment mentorship helped or fell short, revealing what to fix before the next matching cycle.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your mentorship experience! This helps us improve matching and support for everyone in the program. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 3 months, how often have you and your mentor met?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • 2-3 times
  • Monthly or more
  • Weekly or more
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How well does your mentor understand your specific career goals?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Doesn't understand at all最大:Understands completely
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about your mentor?

5行 × 5列
  • Gives me actionable, specific advice
  • Is accessible when I need to reach them
  • Challenges me to grow, not just reassures me
  • Follows through on commitments made in our sessions
  • Helps me build useful connections or visibility
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
ランク付け

Rank these areas by how much your mentor has helped you in each so far.

  1. Technical or role-specific skills
  2. Career navigation and goal-setting
  3. Confidence and mindset
  4. Networking and visibility
  5. Work-life balance and wellbeing
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this mentorship program to a colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q07
選択式必須

Overall, has this mentorship relationship met your expectations?

  • Far below expectations
  • Somewhat below
  • Met expectations
  • Somewhat above
  • Far exceeded expectations
Q08
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent conversation or piece of advice from their mentor that genuinely changed how they approached something at work. Get concrete details: what the advice was, what they did differently, and what the outcome was. If they rated the relationship as below expectations, instead probe the specific moment or pattern that caused disappointment and what they wish had happened instead. Anchor follow-ups on their meeting frequency and 'understands goals' answers.

Q09
自由回答（長文）

What's one thing your mentor could do differently to make this relationship more valuable to you?

Q10
選択式

How long have you been in this mentoring relationship?

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1-3 months
  • 4-6 months
  • 7-12 months
  • Over a year
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role level?

  • Entry-level / individual contributor
  • Mid-level
  • Senior / staff
  • Manager or above
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That wraps things up — thank you for the honest feedback! Program coordinators will use these responses, alongside your mentor's, to strengthen matching and support going forward.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that asks the mentee to walk through one specific recent conversation or moment, surfacing concrete detail on what worked or fell short.
  • Combines structured measurement (meeting frequency, a goals-understanding opinion scale, a multi-statement agreement matrix, and a ranking of help areas) with open-ended reflection, so coordinators get both scorable data and narrative context.
  • Captures program-health signals like recommendation likelihood and whether expectations were met, alongside role level and relationship duration, so results can be segmented before the next matching cycle.
  • Ends with a clear thank-you and sets expectations that coordinators will review responses, plus a dedicated open text question on what the mentor could do differently.

Jotform

Mentor Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready, customizable form builder template for evaluating mentors, benefiting from Jotform's drag-and-drop editor and integrations. It's a general-purpose form rather than a survey built specifically around mentee-reported career impact. No mention of adaptive follow-up questioning.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use, easily customizable form layout
  • Backed by Jotform's broad integration and form-logic ecosystem
  • Likely quick to deploy for basic mentor feedback collection

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe specific incidents
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports evident
  • No transparent, published methodology or prompt logic behind the questions

Typeform

Mentor Evaluation Form Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time template well-suited to Typeform's polished UX for mentor feedback. It offers a pleasant respondent experience but appears to be a fixed question flow rather than one that adapts based on answers. Reporting is likely limited to Typeform's standard response summaries.

優れている点

  • Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Easy to customize branding and question wording
  • Good completion rates typical of Typeform's UX design

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into a specific mentorship moment
  • No voice-based interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

QuestionPro

Non Profit Mentoring Programs Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a sample questionnaire and guide focused on non-profit mentoring programs rather than a plug-and-play fielding template, so setup work is likely required. It covers broad program-level survey question ideas, which is useful for question inspiration but not tailored to a single mentee's ongoing relationship depth.

優れている点

  • Provides example questions specifically framed for mentoring program context
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey analytics platform
  • Useful as a question-writing reference for program administrators

物足りない点

  • Presented as a guide/sample questionnaire, not a ready-to-field interactive survey
  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
  • No transparent per-question methodology or automated quality scoring

よくあるご質問

「Mentor Program Effectiveness Evaluation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your mentorship experience! This helps us improve matching and support for…」・「In the last 3 months, how often have you and your mentor met?」・「How well does your mentor understand your specific career goals?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Psychiatric Intake and Symptom Screening Survey

A pre-appointment intake for mental health practices that captures presenting concerns, symptom frequency over the last two weeks, treatment history, and safety screening before the first visit — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the story behind the symptoms (onset, triggers, what's changed) so clinicians walk in with context instead of a blank checklist.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Nonprofit Mentoring Program Relationship & Impact Survey

Measures how mentees experience match quality, meeting consistency, and goal progress in a nonprofit mentoring program, with an AI follow-up that digs into why relationships work or stall so program staff can improve matching and support rather than just tallying satisfaction scores.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Mentorship Advocacy & Sponsorship Impact Survey

Measures whether a mentorship program is producing real advocacy — introductions, nominations, and sponsorship — not just advice conversations. Built for program owners and L&D teams, with an AI follow-up that surfaces a concrete story of advocacy (or the lack of it) behind the numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Volunteer Mentor Application and Fit Screening Survey

Screens prospective mentors for a formal mentorship program by capturing their expertise areas, availability, self-assessed mentoring skills, and motivations, then uses an AI follow-up interview to probe real coaching experience and test judgment against a realistic difficult-mentee scenario. Built for program coordinators who need more than a resume to predict mentor follow-through and fit.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Intern Feedback and Program Effectiveness Survey

Captures how interns experienced onboarding, mentorship, meaningful work, and team culture, then has them trade off which parts of the program mattered most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind their overall rating. Built for HR and program leads assessing internship ROI and full-time conversion potential.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る