Mentorship Advocacy & Sponsorship Impact Survey
Measures whether a mentorship program is producing real advocacy — introductions, nominations, and sponsorship — not just advice conversations. Built for program owners and L&D teams, with an AI follow-up that surfaces a concrete story of advocacy (or the lack of it) behind the numbers.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
What is your role in the mentorship program?
- Mentee
- Mentor
- Both (mentor to some, mentee to others)
How likely are you to recommend this mentorship program to a colleague?
Thinking about your primary mentorship relationship, how much do you agree with each statement?
- My mentor/mentee actively advocates for my career growth
- My mentor/mentee has connected me to people or opportunities I wouldn't have found on my own
- My mentor/mentee gives me visibility with leaders who influence my career
- I feel comfortable asking my mentor/mentee to advocate for me publicly
In the last 6 months, which of these have you done for your mentee, or received from your mentor?
- Recommended them for a project or stretch assignment
- Introduced them to a leader or key contact
- Nominated them for an award, promotion, or program
- Publicly praised their work in a meeting or to leadership
- Wrote or gave a reference/recommendation
- None of these
Rank these in order of what makes mentorship advocacy most valuable to you, from most to least important.
- Introductions to influential people
- Public recognition or endorsement
- Being recommended for opportunities
- Skill-building guidance
- Emotional support and encouragement
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score by asking for one specific, recent example of mentorship advocacy — a real introduction, nomination, or recommendation that happened (or should have happened but didn't). If they scored low, dig into what advocacy was missing or what made it feel unsafe to ask for it. If they scored high, ask what tangible outcome resulted from that advocacy.
How satisfied are you with the level of support you receive in advocating for your own career growth through this program?
Thinking about a typical mentorship conversation, how do you split the time across these activities? Numbers should add up to 100.
- General career advice
- Skill-building or feedback
- Networking or introductions
- Emotional support
- Active sponsorship (recommending, nominating, vouching)
What gets in the way of advocating more actively for your mentee or receiving more advocacy from your mentor?
- Not enough time together
- Unclear what 'advocacy' should look like
- Lack of trust or relationship depth
- Limited organizational support or incentive
- Not sure who to introduce them to
- Nothing gets in the way
How long have you been part of this mentorship program?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-6 months
- 6-12 months
- More than 1 year
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your current level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Senior/Director level
- Executive
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing this — it genuinely helps. Your responses will be combined with others to identify where the program is building real advocacy and where mentors and mentees need more support to make it happen.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond satisfaction scores with a matrix and multiple-choice questions that ask specifically about introductions, nominations, and sponsorship behaviors in the last 6 months — not just 'advice given.'
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the reasoning behind each respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score, surfacing a concrete story of advocacy (or its absence) rather than leaving the number unexplained.
- Uses a constant-sum question to quantify how mentorship time is actually split, and a ranking question to reveal what respondents value most about advocacy — giving program owners prioritization data, not just sentiment.
- Segments by role and program tenure (mentor/mentee, level, time in program) so L&D teams can see whether advocacy gaps cluster in specific cohorts, then auto-generates a report combining these responses.
SurveyMonkey
Mentorship And Advocacy Survey Template & QuestionsA ready-to-field static template covering mentorship and advocacy themes, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and distribution tools. It appears to rely on fixed question sets without any mechanism to dynamically probe individual responses. Good for benchmarking general sentiment, but less suited to uncovering the specific story behind a low or high score.
優れている点
- Fielding-ready template on a mature, widely-used survey platform
- Likely benefits from SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and analysis tooling
- Simple setup for teams wanting a quick, standard mentorship survey
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind a recommendation or satisfaction score — all respondents get the same static questions
- No voice AI interview or guided task/screen-share option for richer qualitative capture
- No published methodology on how quality or sentiment scoring (if any) is calculated
よくあるご質問
「Mentorship Advocacy & Sponsorship Impact Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your mentorship relationship. Your responses are completely confidential a…」・「What is your role in the mentorship program?」・「How likely are you to recommend this mentorship program to a colleague?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。