すべてのテンプレート
Finance & Insurance

DAO Governance Satisfaction & Participation Survey

Measures member satisfaction with proposal processes, voting experience, and treasury transparency in decentralized communities. Designed to identify participation barriers, trust gaps, and priority improvements for governance leads.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全30問・約13分
Q01
メッセージ

Welcome to the DAO Governance Satisfaction & Participation Survey. This survey takes approximately 13 minutes and asks about your experience with proposals, voting, and treasury transparency over the last 3 months. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate to improve community governance. By continuing, you consent to participate.

Q02
選択式

In the last 3 months, how often have you actively contributed to this community?

  • Weekly or more
  • About monthly
  • A few times
  • Not in the last 3 months
Q03
オピニオンスケール

Thinking about proposals in the last 3 months, please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement: Proposals are clearly written and easy to understand.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q04
選択式

In the last 3 months, did you vote on any proposals?

  • Yes
  • No
Q05
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree or disagree: Overall, treasury activity has been transparent in the last 3 months.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q06
オピニオンスケール

How much do you trust the overall governance process today?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:No trust at all最大:Complete trust
Q07
選択式

Which roles do you identify with in this community? Select all that apply.

  • Developer/Engineer
  • Researcher/Analyst
  • Delegate
  • Token holder
  • Contributor/Reviewer
  • Community moderator/manager
  • Operations/Project management
  • Designer/UX
  • Treasury/Finance
  • Other (please specify)
Q08
メッセージ

Thank you for your time and insights! Your feedback will be used to improve community governance. Results will be shared in aggregate with the community.

Q09
選択式

Which types of contributions have you made in the last 3 months? Select all that apply.

  • Code or technical work
  • Proposal authoring
  • Proposal feedback/discussion
  • Voting participation
  • Documentation or education
  • Community moderation
  • Design/UX
  • Operations/project management
  • Treasury/finance work
  • Other (please specify)
Q10
オピニオンスケール

There is enough time to review and discuss proposals before a vote is called.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q11
オピニオンスケール

How clear were the voting instructions and options in the last 3 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q12
選択式

Have you read a treasury report or budget update in the last 3 months?

  • Yes
  • No
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to recommend participating in this community's governance to a peer?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q14
選択式

How long have you been involved with this community?

  • Under 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • More than 2 years
Q15
選択式

What were the main reasons you have not contributed in the last 3 months? Select all that apply.

  • Lack of time
  • Unclear where to start
  • I felt my input would not matter
  • Too many proposals/threads to follow
  • Discussions felt unwelcoming
  • Other priorities outside the community
  • Other (please specify)
Q16
オピニオンスケール

Community feedback is meaningfully incorporated into proposals before they go to a vote.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How confident are you that your votes were recorded and counted correctly?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q18
オピニオンスケール

Treasury reports are easy to understand.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q19
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions for improving governance in this community.

Q20
選択式

Which region do you primarily participate from?

  • Americas
  • Europe / Middle East / Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
オピニオンスケール

The proposal process is accessible to members regardless of technical expertise.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q22
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree or disagree: I am satisfied with the fairness of recent voting outcomes.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q23
オピニオンスケール

Treasury reports are published frequently enough.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q24
AIインタビュー

We'd like to learn more about your governance experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q25
プルダウン

What is your primary language for community participation?

  • English
  • Spanish
  • Chinese (Mandarin)
  • Portuguese
  • French
  • Japanese
  • Korean
  • Russian
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
自由回答(長文)

What is the single most important change that would improve the proposal process in the next quarter?

Q27
選択式

What were the main reasons you did not vote in the last 3 months? Select all that apply.

  • Missed the voting window
  • Unclear process or tools
  • Too many proposals to evaluate
  • Low perceived impact of my vote
  • Technical issues (wallet/app)
  • Conflicts of interest concerns
  • Other (please specify)
Q28
オピニオンスケール

Treasury reports clearly link spending to approved proposals.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q29
選択式

Are you currently a delegated voter (i.e., you vote on behalf of others)?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q30
ランク付け

Please rank the following treasury transparency improvements from most to least important.

  1. More frequent updates
  2. Simpler summaries/visuals
  3. Deeper line-item detail
  4. Clearer links to approved proposals
  5. Independent audits/attestations
  6. Better notifications/alerts
ドラッグして順位を付ける

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Purpose-built for DAO governance, not generic membership: dedicated blocks on proposal clarity, review time, and whether feedback is incorporated before a vote is called
  • Covers the full governance funnel in one flow — contribution frequency and barriers, voting confidence and perceived fairness, and treasury report readability/frequency, ending with a ranking of treasury transparency improvements
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview segment so members can explain in their own words why they didn't vote or contribute, going beyond fixed-choice barrier lists
  • Transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring give governance leads an auditable, ready-to-share report rather than raw export data

QuestionPro

Non Profit Member Satisfaction Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a sample-questionnaire guide for nonprofit membership organizations rather than a DAO- or web3-specific instrument, so proposal, voting, and treasury-transparency questions have to be built from scratch. It's a reasonable starting point for general member-satisfaction wording but not fielding-ready for decentralized governance out of the box.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with broad question-bank support for membership organizations
  • Provides sample questionnaire text as a starting point rather than a blank page
  • Applicable to general nonprofit/community contexts beyond a single use case

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe low satisfaction or non-participation answers
  • No DAO-specific coverage of proposal process, on-chain voting confidence, or treasury reporting
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized into a report

Typeform

Member Satisfaction Survey Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time member satisfaction template aimed at general membership communities rather than decentralized governance specifically. Good for a polished respondent experience, but it doesn't address proposal review time, vote-counting trust, or treasury transparency, so it would need heavy customization for a DAO context.

優れている点

  • Clean, conversational form UI that's generally easy to complete on mobile
  • Simple to duplicate and re-brand for a generic community membership survey
  • Well-known platform with straightforward embedding/sharing options

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option — respondents get the same static question sequence regardless of answers
  • No built-in items on proposal process, voting confidence, or treasury reporting specific to on-chain governance
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

よくあるご質問

「DAO Governance Satisfaction & Participation Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が30問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Welcome to the DAO Governance Satisfaction & Participation Survey. This survey takes approximately 13 minutes and asks a…」・「In the last 3 months, how often have you actively contributed to this community?」・「Thinking about proposals in the last 3 months, please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following stateme…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、30問を約13分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る