QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Performance Improvement Plan Experience Survey

Gathers feedback from employees who have gone through a performance improvement plan, covering clarity of expectations, manager support, fairness of the process, and outcome. Built for HR and People Ops teams auditing PIP quality, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific check-in or moment that shaped how the employee felt about the process.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your experience with a performance improvement plan. Your answers are used to improve how these plans are run — not to reopen your case. This takes about 5 minutes and your individual responses are kept confidential.

Q02
選択式必須

What was the outcome of your performance improvement plan?

  • Completed successfully - remained in my role
  • Completed successfully - moved to a different role
  • Plan was extended
  • Resulted in separation from the company
  • Still in progress
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

At the start of the plan, how clear were the expectations and goals you were given?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not clear at all最大:Extremely clear
Q04
オピニオンスケール必須

How supportive was your manager throughout the plan, beyond just tracking whether you hit targets?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not supportive at all最大:Extremely supportive
Q05
マトリクス

How much do you agree with each statement about your experience?

4行 × 5列
  • The goals in my plan were specific and achievable
  • My manager's check-ins felt helpful, not just monitoring
  • I had access to the resources or training I needed to improve
  • The feedback I received was specific enough to act on
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
選択式

How often did you and your manager actually meet to discuss progress on the plan?

  • Weekly
  • Every 2 weeks
  • Monthly
  • No regular schedule
  • No check-ins happened
Q07
評価スケール必須

Looking back, how fair do you feel the overall process was?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very unfair最大:Very fair
Q08
AIインタビュー

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific check-in or conversation during the plan that stands out to them, either positively or negatively, and reconstruct exactly what was said and how it affected their motivation or trust in the process. Anchor on their fairness rating: if they rated the process as unfair, probe what specifically felt unfair (the goals, the timeline, the manager's behavior, or the outcome). If they are still in progress, probe what would need to happen in the remaining time for them to consider it fair.

Q09
自由回答（長文）

What is one change to how the plan was designed or run that would have made the biggest difference for you?

Q10
選択式

Which best describes your role level?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager or team lead
  • Director or above
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How long had you been with the company when the plan started?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 3-5 years
  • 5+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your honesty. Your responses are combined with others to help HR improve how performance plans are structured and supported going forward.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific check-in or moment that shaped how the employee felt about the process, surfacing context static forms miss.
  • Combines structured measures (clarity of expectations, manager support, fairness rating, a matrix of agreement statements) with open-ended reflection, giving HR both quantifiable trends and qualitative depth.
  • Segments responses by role level and tenure at plan start, so People Ops can see whether fairness and support perceptions differ by seniority or experience.
  • Every AI-driven prompt is transparent and disclosed to respondents, and results roll up into an auto-generated report — no manual synthesis required.

SurveySparrow

Free Performance Improvement Plan Template

This is a fielding-ready PIP template covering similar ground (expectations, support, fairness) aimed at HR teams. It's a conventional survey builder template, so questions are fixed once deployed rather than adapting to each respondent's answers. No mention of an interview-style mechanism to reconstruct specific moments from the employee experience.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for the PIP use case, so questions are directly relevant out of the box
  • Likely quick to deploy given SurveySparrow's template library and general survey-building tools
  • Free to use as a starting template

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe deeper into a specific check-in or conversation
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No published per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

Jotform

Performance Improvement Request Form Template

This is a static form template focused on requesting/initiating a performance improvement action rather than surveying the employee's experience of going through one after the fact. It's fielding-ready within Jotform's form builder but is oriented toward process intake, not post-PIP feedback or sentiment. Useful for triggering a PIP, not for auditing how the plan felt to the employee.

優れている点

  • Simple, ready-to-use form for initiating a performance improvement request
  • Benefits from Jotform's broad form customization and integration ecosystem
  • Free-tier accessible like most Jotform templates

物足りない点

  • Not designed to capture employee experience/sentiment post-PIP (clarity, fairness, manager support)
  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a specific moment or check-in
  • Static field-based form with no automated quality scoring or generated insights report

よくあるご質問

「Performance Improvement Plan Experience Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your experience with a performance improvement plan. Your answers are used…」・「What was the outcome of your performance improvement plan?」・「At the start of the plan, how clear were the expectations and goals you were given?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Business Partnership Application & Fit Screener

A structured intake for companies applying to become resellers, affiliates, referral partners, or integration partners — capturing company profile, audience overlap, and resource commitment, with an AI follow-up that probes the real motivation and strategic fit behind the application. Built for partnerships and business development teams screening inbound applicants.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Performance Review & Growth Opportunities Survey

Measures how employees experience performance reviews, career conversations, and growth opportunities — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific stretch assignments, mentorship moments, or blockers behind their advancement ratings. Built for HR and people leaders benchmarking review quality and career pathing across teams.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection Survey

A structured self-evaluation for performance review cycles, covering goal achievement, competency ratings, challenges, and development priorities. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific evidence behind the employee's self-rating instead of accepting vague self-praise or self-criticism at face value. Built for HR and people managers running review or check-in cycles.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Disciplinary Action Process Feedback Survey

Gathers confidential feedback from employees who recently went through a disciplinary action, measuring how clearly the reason was explained, how fair and consistent the process felt, and trust in the manager or HR handling it. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually happened in the meeting rather than just the rating given. For HR and People teams auditing process quality and consistency.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Personnel Action Experience and Fairness Survey

For HR teams and people managers who want to know how a promotion, transfer, reclassification, or disciplinary action actually landed with the employee. Covers clarity, timeliness, and perceived fairness of the process, plus a matrix on procedural steps, and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific reasons behind the employee's fairness rating rather than a generic satisfaction score.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Performance Self-Assessment & Growth Survey

A structured self-assessment covering goal achievement, manager support, and growth priorities for the current review period, for use in performance reviews or pulse check-ins. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific achievement or obstacle behind the respondent's self-rating instead of leaving it as an abstract number.

テンプレートを見る