QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Employee & HR

Employee Performance Self-Assessment & Growth Survey

A structured self-assessment covering goal achievement, manager support, and growth priorities for the current review period, for use in performance reviews or pulse check-ins. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific achievement or obstacle behind the respondent's self-rating instead of leaving it as an abstract number.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this review period. Your honest input helps shape coaching, goals, and recognition going forward. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 5-6 minutes and your individual responses are shared only with HR and your manager as part of the review process.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how would you rate your own performance during this review period?

スケール: 1 – 10
最小:Well below expectations最大:Far exceeded expectations
Q03
マトリクス必須

How would you rate yourself on each of the following this period?

5行 × 5列
  • Quality of work
  • Meeting deadlines
  • Collaboration with teammates
  • Taking initiative
  • Communication with stakeholders
列: Needs improvement · Developing · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations · Outstanding
Q04
選択式必須

In the last 90 days, how often did you receive specific, actionable feedback from your manager (not just general praise)?

  • Never
  • Rarely (once or twice total)
  • Sometimes (about monthly)
  • Often (about biweekly)
  • Every week or more
Q05
評価スケール必須

How supported do you feel by your manager in achieving your goals?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Not supported at all最大:Extremely well supported
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these would do the most to improve your performance and growth going forward? Pick the most and least impactful each round.

  • More skill-building or training
  • More mentorship or coaching
  • More autonomy over how I work
  • More recognition for good work
  • Clearer career path or promotion criteria
  • Better tools or resources
  • More reasonable workload
  • Clearer, more specific goals
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most impactful最も悪い:Least impactful
Q07
ポイント配分必須

Distribute 100 points across the factors that most drove your performance this period, based on how much each helped or hurt.

  • Manager support
  • Team collaboration
  • Tools and resources
  • Workload and capacity
  • Clarity of goals
  • My own motivation and effort
100ポイントを配分
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct one specific, concrete moment from this review period that best explains the respondent's self-rating: a project, decision, or interaction, what they did, and the outcome. If they rated themselves highly, probe what made it possible and whether it's repeatable; if they rated themselves lower, probe the single biggest obstacle and whether it was within their control, their manager's control, or neither. Anchor on specifics, not general impressions.

Q09
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend your team as a great place to work to a friend or former colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q10
メッセージ

Almost done — just a few optional background questions to help us look at patterns fairly across teams. Feel free to skip any of these.

Q11
プルダウン

Which department or function are you part of?

  • Engineering / Product
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Success / Support
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • People / HR
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How long have you been in your current role?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 3-5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

Which best describes your current level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead / senior IC
  • People manager
  • Director or above
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

Thank you for reflecting so openly on your performance. Your ratings and comments will feed directly into your upcoming review conversation and help us spot where more support or recognition is needed.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an opinion-scale self-rating plus a matrix breakdown across specific performance dimensions, so the review captures both an overall number and category-level detail
  • Pairs a constant-sum allocation and max-diff prioritization exercise to quantify which factors actually drove performance and what would most improve growth going forward, rather than relying on open text alone
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the concrete achievement or obstacle behind the respondent's self-rating, turning an abstract number into a specific story
  • Adds manager-support and eNPS-style questions alongside optional department/tenure/level background questions, enabling segment-level reporting without lengthening the core survey

QuestionPro

Short Employee Performance Review Survey

A short, static employee performance review survey aimed at identifying growth opportunities. It's a fielding-ready template with standard rating and feedback questions, but it relies on fixed question text with no mechanism to probe deeper into any single response.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use template focused specifically on growth opportunities
  • Backed by a broad established survey platform with reporting/analytics tools
  • Short format likely to have low completion friction

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to dig into a specific rating
  • No published methodology for how questions were validated or scored
  • No voice-based interview option for richer qualitative detail

Jotform

Pharmacy Employee Performance Review Form Template

A form template built specifically for pharmacy employee evaluations rather than general employee self-assessment, so it's narrower in scope than a cross-functional performance review. It's a fillable form template, easily customized via Jotform's builder, but it is a static evaluation form rather than an interview-driven survey.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for a specific industry use case (pharmacy)
  • Easy to customize using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Fielding-ready as a standard evaluation form

物足りない点

  • Industry-specific framing makes it a poor fit for general employee self-assessment
  • No adaptive follow-up or AI-driven probing of responses
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative reports

SurveyMonkey

Employee Performance Survey Template

A general-purpose employee performance survey template from a major survey platform, fielding-ready with standard rating and multiple-choice questions. It covers common performance review dimensions but, like other static templates, doesn't adapt to individual answers.

優れている点

  • Well-known platform with strong distribution and reporting features
  • Template covers standard performance review dimensions
  • Easy to launch and customize quickly

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct the story behind a self-rating
  • No voice AI interview option for qualitative depth
  • No transparent, publishable question/prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Sample Product Manager Performance Review Template

A role-specific performance review template designed for evaluating product managers, typically completed by a manager or peer rather than as an employee self-assessment. It's a fielding-ready template but narrower in audience and framed around a single job role rather than general self-reflection.

優れている点

  • Tailored questions specific to product manager responsibilities
  • Conversational survey format that can feel more engaging than plain forms
  • Fielding-ready template requiring minimal setup

物足りない点

  • Built for evaluating one specific role rather than general employee self-assessment
  • No adaptive AI interview to surface the concrete moment behind a rating
  • No stated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

よくあるご質問

「Employee Performance Self-Assessment & Growth Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this review period. Your honest input helps shape coaching, goals, and rec…」・「Overall, how would you rate your own performance during this review period?」・「How would you rate yourself on each of the following this period?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Employee & HR

Employee Information & Communication Needs Survey

Captures up-to-date employee profile details (team, tenure, work location) alongside how well-informed and equipped staff feel by company communications and HR resources. Includes an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment information broke down, so HR can fix real gaps instead of guessing.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection Survey

A structured self-evaluation for performance review cycles, covering goal achievement, competency ratings, challenges, and development priorities. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific evidence behind the employee's self-rating instead of accepting vague self-praise or self-criticism at face value. Built for HR and people managers running review or check-in cycles.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Employee Performance Review & Growth Opportunities Survey

Measures how employees experience performance reviews, career conversations, and growth opportunities — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific stretch assignments, mentorship moments, or blockers behind their advancement ratings. Built for HR and people leaders benchmarking review quality and career pathing across teams.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Employee Self-Evaluation & Performance Reflection

A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, combining competency self-ratings, goal progress, and development priorities with an AI follow-up that draws out the specific evidence behind an employee's accomplishments and challenges. Built for HR teams and managers running annual or quarterly review processes.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Employee Performance Review & Development Check-In

A structured self-assessment for performance review cycles, covering goal progress, core competencies, manager support, and development priorities — paired with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the story behind the ratings, not just the numbers, for richer 1:1 prep and calibration.

テンプレートを見る
Employee & HR

Employee Work Satisfaction Pulse Survey

Tracks how satisfied employees are with their job, manager, and growth path, and flags flight risk before it shows up in attrition data. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reason behind each person's lowest-rated area instead of leaving it as an unexplained number.

テンプレートを見る