QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Post-Workshop Feedback and Facilitator Effectiveness Survey

Captures how attendees rate a workshop's content, pacing, and facilitator right after it ends, plus how likely they are to recommend it — for training teams and event organizers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped each person's recommendation score, going beyond star ratings to what actually landed or fell flat.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for attending today's workshop! We'd love your honest feedback while it's fresh — this takes about 5 minutes and directly shapes how we run the next session. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how satisfied were you with the workshop?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Very dissatisfied最大:Very satisfied
Q03
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about today's session?

4行 × 5列
  • The facilitator was knowledgeable about the subject
  • The pace of the workshop was appropriate
  • The materials/handouts were useful
  • The content was directly relevant to my day-to-day work
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
選択式必須

Which part of the workshop did you find most valuable?

  • Live demonstration
  • Hands-on practice
  • Group discussion
  • Q&A with the facilitator
  • Reference materials/handouts
Q05
ランク付け

Rank the following workshop segments from most to least valuable to you. (Template note: replace with your actual session/module names before launching.)

  1. Opening keynote
  2. Hands-on exercise A
  3. Hands-on exercise B
  4. Group discussion
  5. Q&A session
  6. Closing wrap-up
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q06
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this workshop to a colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q07
AIインタビュー

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation score: ask for a specific moment or exercise from today's workshop that most shaped that score, whether it was positive or negative. If the score was low or middling, press on what single change would move it up a few points; if it was high, ask what almost made them rate it lower. Anchor everything to concrete moments in the session rather than general impressions.

Q08
自由回答（短文）

What's the single most valuable thing you'll take away from this workshop?

Q09
自由回答（長文）

What's one thing we could change to make this workshop better next time?

Q10
選択式

In the past 12 months, how many workshops or training sessions like this one have you attended?

  • This was my first
  • 1-2
  • 3-5
  • 6 or more
Q11
選択式

Which best describes your role?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director or above
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How many years of experience do you have in this field?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for the feedback! We'll use your responses, alongside everyone else's, to fine-tune the content and pacing of future workshops.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a single satisfaction score with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific moment behind each respondent's recommendation rating, surfacing what actually landed or fell flat.
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scales, agreement matrix, ranking of workshop segments) with open-ended short and long text questions for richer qualitative context.
  • Captures respondent role, experience level, and prior training frequency so facilitators can segment feedback by audience type.
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and auto-generated reports mean facilitators get analysis-ready insights without manually reading every transcript.

Jotform

Workshop Feedback Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable static form builder template for collecting workshop feedback. Strong for quick deployment, branding, and integrations, but it only captures fixed-field responses at submission time. No mechanism to ask a respondent to elaborate on their own answer.

優れている点

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization
  • Wide integration and export options typical of Jotform
  • Fast to deploy for simple feedback collection

物足りない点

  • Static form with no adaptive follow-up questioning
  • No per-response quality scoring or automated analysis
  • No transparent record of question logic/prompts beyond the form fields themselves

SurveySparrow

Free Workshop Feedback Form Template | Sample

A conversational-style, one-question-at-a-time template aimed at improving completion rates over standard forms. It's a fixed-question sample rather than a dynamic interview, so every respondent sees the same script regardless of their answers.

優れている点

  • Conversational chat-style UI improves respondent engagement
  • Mobile-friendly one-at-a-time question flow
  • Free template available for quick setup

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI probing based on individual responses
  • No voice interview option
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended answers

Typeform

Workshop Feedback Form Template

A polished, conversational form template known for clean design and simple branching logic. It's still a predetermined question set — respondents can be routed to different questions via logic jumps, but the tool cannot generate a new, personalized follow-up question based on what someone actually typed.

優れている点

  • Highly polished, on-brand conversational design
  • Logic-jump branching for basic personalization
  • Widely recognized ease of use for respondents

物足りない点

  • No true adaptive AI interview that reacts to open-text content
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring
  • No voice AI interview capability

QuestionPro

Seminar feedback & attendee information survey questions + Sample questionnaire template

A broader seminar/attendee-information questionnaire sample with sections on demographics and event logistics alongside feedback. It reads more like a sample question bank/guide than a single fielding-ready template, and relies on standard scale and multiple-choice items throughout.

優れている点

  • Combines attendee demographic capture with feedback questions
  • Backed by an established enterprise survey platform with broad question-type library
  • Includes sample questionnaire structure for reference

物足りない点

  • Presented as a sample/guide rather than a ready-to-field survey
  • No adaptive follow-up interview tied to a recommendation score
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology for any AI-assisted analysis

よくあるご質問

「Post-Workshop Feedback and Facilitator Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for attending today's workshop! We'd love your honest feedback while it's fresh — this takes about 5 minutes and…」・「Overall, how satisfied were you with the workshop?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about today's session?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Product Usability & User Experience Feedback Survey

Evaluates how easy, efficient, and satisfying your product or website is to use, combining attribute ratings and a prioritization exercise with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real recent moment of friction instead of relying on vague complaints. Built for product, design, and research teams running ongoing usability tracking.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Program and Session Participant Feedback Survey

Captures how participants experienced a workshop, training, or program — satisfaction, perceived value of specific sessions, and likelihood to return — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their ratings so organizers know exactly what to keep, fix, or cut next time.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Activity & Session Evaluation Survey

A flexible feedback survey for workshops, trainings, retreats, or team activities — covering attendance, facilitator quality, content relevance, and likelihood to recommend, plus an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind each recommendation score so organizers know exactly what to fix or repeat.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Post-Training Session Feedback & Impact Survey

Captures how a training session landed — content quality, trainer effectiveness, and confidence applying new skills — for L&D teams and instructors. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind the recommendation score: what specifically helped or blocked people from using what they learned.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey

Captures attendee reactions to a specific session — content depth, speaker delivery, relevance to their work, and preferred formats going forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that shaped their overall rating instead of a generic thumbs up or down.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Coaching Session Client Feedback Survey

Captures how clients experience individual coaching sessions — perceived progress, coach effectiveness across key behaviors, and likelihood to continue or recommend. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score, surfacing what actually drove or undermined value in the session.

テンプレートを見る