QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Events & Community

Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey

Captures attendee reactions to a specific session — content depth, speaker delivery, relevance to their work, and preferred formats going forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that shaped their overall rating instead of a generic thumbs up or down.

このテンプレートを使う

登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限

ライブプレビュー
Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey

Thanks for attending! We'd love your honest feedback on the session you just saw — it helps us book better speakers and formats next time. About 7 minutes.

Powered by QuestionPunk

デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全11問・約7分
メッセージ

Thanks for attending! We'd love your honest feedback on the session you just saw — it helps us book better speakers and formats next time. About 7 minutes.

Q01
自由回答（短文）必須

Which session are you giving feedback on? (Include the speaker's name or session title.)

Q02
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about this session?

4行 × 5列
  • The content depth matched what was promised in the session description
  • The speaker explained complex concepts clearly
  • The pacing (too fast or too slow) felt appropriate
  • There was enough time for questions or interaction
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How relevant was this session's content to the work you do right now?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not relevant at all最大:Extremely relevant
Q04
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the speaker's overall delivery and presentation style?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q05
選択式

Which format would you most like to see for this topic at a future event?

  • Traditional lecture/presentation
  • Panel discussion
  • Interactive workshop or hands-on lab
  • Fireside chat / interview format
  • Small-group roundtable
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）

Which of these matter most, and least, to how much you value a session like this?

  • Depth of technical content
  • Speaker's expertise and credibility
  • Relevance to my current role
  • Opportunities for Q&A
  • Session length
  • Quality of slides/materials
  • Networking time before or after
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Matters most最も悪い:Matters least
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend this session to a colleague?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the specific moment or takeaway that most shaped this attendee's overall rating — a slide, a demo, an answer to a question, or a point where they got lost. If they rated content depth or relevance low, probe exactly where the mismatch was (too basic, too advanced, off-topic) and what they expected instead. If the recommendation score is low despite positive matrix answers, surface the hidden dealbreaker.

Q09
自由回答（長文）

Anything specific you'd want to tell the speaker directly, good or bad?

Q10
選択式

Which best describes your role?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director or VP
  • Executive/C-suite
  • Student
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How many times have you attended this conference, including this year?

  • First time
  • 2-3 times
  • 4 or more times
  • Prefer not to say
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes directly to our program committee and is shared (anonymously) with speakers to help them improve.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that reconstructs the specific moment or takeaway shaping the attendee's overall rating, rather than stopping at a static scale
  • Combines multiple quantitative angles (matrix agreement statements, relevance rating-scale, delivery rating, best-worst trade-off prioritization, recommend-likelihood rating-scale) so ratings can be cross-checked against each other
  • Captures format preference (multiple-choice) and role/attendance history (multiple-choice) to segment feedback by attendee type and experience level
  • Ends with an open open-text inviting direct messages to the speaker, giving qualitative color beyond the AI follow-up

Jotform

E-Learning Session Feedback Form Template

This is a fielding-ready form template, but it's built for e-learning/online course sessions rather than live conference talks, so question framing (course structure, instructor pacing) only partially overlaps with conference-speaker feedback. It's a static form builder template, not tailored to capture a single memorable moment from a session.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-use, customizable form builder template
  • Likely covers standard e-learning session elements like content clarity and instructor effectiveness
  • Part of a broad Jotform template library for easy adaptation

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a rating was given — respondents just fill static fields
  • Built for e-learning contexts, not conference sessions, so questions won't map cleanly to speaker/session evaluation
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized into insights

Typeform

Session Feedback Form Template

A generic session feedback template that could be adapted to conference talks, presented in Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time format. It's a static template — good for basic sentiment capture but not designed to dig into a specific standout moment. Customization to conference-specific language (speaker delivery, format preferences) would be needed.

優れている点

  • Clean, conversational UI known for higher completion rates
  • Generic enough to adapt to many session types including conference talks
  • Easy to embed and share via link or QR code

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interviewing — follow-up logic is limited to predefined branching, not open-ended probing
  • No built-in automated quality scoring of open-text responses
  • No voice-based interview option for richer verbal feedback

QuestionPro

Conference Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

Directly comparable — a conference-specific evaluation template with sample questions covering sessions, speakers, and overall event logistics. It's a static questionnaire meant to be copied and configured, likely broader (whole-event) rather than focused on a single session's specific moment. Strong on breadth, but standard closed-question format throughout.

優れている点

  • Purpose-built for conference/event evaluation, so terminology and question bank fit the use case well
  • Sample questionnaire gives a ready starting point for admins
  • Backed by an established survey platform with reporting and analytics tools

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct the specific moment shaping an attendee's rating — relies on fixed question sets
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No transparent per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative synthesis of open text

よくあるご質問

「Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Which session are you giving feedback on? (Include the speaker's name or session title.)」・「How much do you agree with each statement about this session?」・「How relevant was this session's content to the work you do right now?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、11問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Events & Community

Wedding Vendor Experience & Value Feedback Survey

For wedding planners, venues, and vendors who want a clear read on how couples experienced their service — from first planning email to the last dance. Covers planning support, day-of execution, communication, and value for money, with an AI follow-up that pulls out the specific moment behind a couple's rating instead of a vague impression.

テンプレートを見る
Events & Community

Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.

テンプレートを見る
Events & Community

Conference & Webinar Presenter Feedback Survey

Captures how attendees rate a specific speaker or session — clarity, pacing, expertise, and Q&A handling — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment that most shaped their opinion. Built for event organizers, training teams, and internal speaker programs who need actionable feedback beyond a star rating.

テンプレートを見る
Events & Community

Seminar & Conference Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees experienced a seminar or conference session — content quality, speaker delivery, logistics, and likelihood to return — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment satisfaction rose or fell instead of settling for a generic rating. Built for event organizers, training teams, and association program committees.

テンプレートを見る
Events & Community

Program and Session Participant Feedback Survey

Captures how participants experienced a workshop, training, or program — satisfaction, perceived value of specific sessions, and likelihood to return — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their ratings so organizers know exactly what to keep, fix, or cut next time.

テンプレートを見る
Events & Community

Conference Evaluation & Attendee Experience Survey

Captures how attendees rated sessions, speakers, networking, and logistics, plus their likelihood to return or recommend — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the single moment or gap that most shaped their overall verdict. Built for event and community teams planning next year's agenda and budget.

テンプレートを見る