Product Integration Priorities & Gaps Assessment
A structured survey for active product users to evaluate current integration usage, identify unmet needs, and prioritize capabilities — providing actionable data for roadmap planning.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
Have you used our product within the past 3 months?
- Yes
- No
Which of the following tool categories do you currently connect with our product? Select all that apply.
- Project management (e.g., Asana, Jira, Trello)
- Team chat (e.g., Slack, Microsoft Teams)
- CRM/marketing (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot, Marketo)
- Cloud storage (e.g., Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive)
- BI/analytics (e.g., Looker, Tableau, Power BI)
- Data warehouse (e.g., BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift)
- Identity/SSO (e.g., Okta, Azure AD)
- Payments/billing (e.g., Stripe, Chargebee)
- Workflow automation (e.g., Zapier, Make)
- ITSM/helpdesk (e.g., ServiceNow, Zendesk)
- Custom API/webhooks
- No integrations connected today
Rank the following integration use cases by importance for your team. Drag the most important to the top.
- Sync customer or project data across tools
- Send notifications to teams or stakeholders
- Automate multi-step workflows
- Import or export files and data
- Single sign-on and user provisioning
Thinking about integrations you do NOT currently use with our product, which categories are most missing or in need of improvement? Select up to three.
- Project management
- Team chat
- CRM/marketing
- Cloud storage
- BI/analytics
- Data warehouse
- Identity/SSO
- Payments/billing
- Workflow automation
- ITSM/helpdesk
- Custom API/webhooks
- None — current integrations meet my needs
How comfortable are you configuring integrations on your own, without help from IT or support?
Overall, how satisfied are you with the current integration options available in our product?
What best describes your primary role?
- Individual contributor (technical)
- Individual contributor (non-technical)
- People manager
- Executive/leadership
- Operations
- Product management
- Data/analytics
- IT/engineering
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will directly inform our integration roadmap and help us build the features that matter most to you. If you have any questions, please contact [research-team@company.com].
In the past 30 days, how often did you use integrations in your workflows?
- Not at all
- Once or twice total
- A few times a week
- About once a day
- Multiple times a day
Rank the following integration capabilities by importance for your team. Drag the most important to the top.
- Real-time data syncing
- Scheduled or batch data transfers
- Error handling and automatic retries
- Custom field mapping
- Activity logs and monitoring
- Granular permission controls
What is the single integration you need most, and what are the top one or two actions it should support?
What most often blocks integration work in your team today? Select all that apply.
- Don't have the needed integration
- Setup is too complex
- Permission or security constraints
- Costs or pricing
- Limited admin rights
- Performance or rate limits
- Data quality or consistency concerns
- Not a current priority
- Other
Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts about your integration needs, priorities, or experiences.
What is the approximate size of your organization?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001+
Which outcomes do you most expect from integrations? Rank from most to least expected.
- Time saved on manual tasks
- Fewer manual errors
- Faster insights and decisions
- Improved team visibility and communication
- Reduced operational costs
- Stronger compliance or security posture
Approximately how many team hours per week do you think integrations could save?
- Less than 1 hour
- 1–3 hours
- 4–7 hours
- 8–15 hours
- 16–30 hours
- More than 30 hours
- Not sure
Which industry best describes your organization?
- Software/Technology
- Professional services
- Financial services
- Healthcare/Life sciences
- Education
- Retail/eCommerce
- Manufacturing
- Media/Entertainment
- Nonprofit/Public sector
- Other
Approximately how many people are on your immediate team?
- 1–3
- 4–7
- 8–15
- 16–30
- 31–50
- 51+
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes ranking questions that force respondents to prioritize specific integration use cases, capabilities, and expected outcomes rather than just rating them in isolation
- Uses an AI follow-up interview at the end that adapts to each respondent's prior answers, surfacing detail a static form would miss
- Separates current integration behavior (categories used, frequency, blockers) from unmet needs (an open-text question on the single most-needed integration and its business case), giving roadmap teams both usage and gap data in one instrument
- Captures segmentation data (role, org size, industry, team size) alongside a self-reported comfort/satisfaction scale, so results can be cut by respondent type during roadmap planning
QuestionPro
Product Evaluation Survey Template and Sample QuestionnaireA general-purpose product evaluation questionnaire covering overall satisfaction and feature perception rather than integration usage specifically. It is a ready-to-field static template, useful as a broad product feedback instrument but not built around integration prioritization or gap analysis. Teams would need to heavily customize it to get integration-specific roadmap data.
優れている点
- Established survey platform with broad question-type library
- Ready-to-use template reduces setup time for general product feedback
- Sample questionnaire gives a starting structure for standard product evaluation metrics
物足りない点
- Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up probing on individual answers
- No mention of automated per-response quality scoring
- Not tailored to integration-specific use cases, capabilities, or blockers
SurveyMonkey
Product Review Template: Turn Feedback Into Product WinsA general product review/feedback template aimed at capturing sentiment on a product overall, not focused on integration ecosystems or roadmap prioritization. It's a fielding-ready static form, positioned for broad customer feedback rather than a structured integration-gaps assessment. Useful as a starting point but would require significant rework to address integration-specific priorities.
優れている点
- Widely used platform with strong distribution and reporting tools
- Simple, ready-to-deploy template for general product feedback
- Familiar interface likely to have high completion rates among general respondents
物足りない点
- Static question flow with no adaptive or voice AI interviewing
- No built-in mechanism for ranking or prioritizing specific integration capabilities/use cases
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses
よくあるご質問
「Product Integration Priorities & Gaps Assessment」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が19問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thank you for participating in this survey about your integration experience. Your responses are anonymous and will be r…」・「Have you used our product within the past 3 months?」・「Which of the following tool categories do you currently connect with our product? Select all that apply.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、19問を約9分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。