メッセージ
すべてのテンプレートIndustry-Specific
Soccer Player Development & Performance Evaluation
A structured evaluation form for coaches, scouts, or player-development staff to rate a soccer player's technical, tactical, physical, and mental attributes, then prioritize development areas. The AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest development priority with a concrete recent-match example instead of a vague rating.
登録なしでお試し可能・無料プランでも回答数無制限
ライブプレビュー
Soccer Player Development & Performance Evaluation
Thanks for taking a few minutes to evaluate this player. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest, specific observations help shape their development plan — this should take about 6-8 minutes.
Powered by QuestionPunk
デフォルト テーマ。色とフォントは自由に変更できます。
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
全10問・約7分
Q01
選択式必須
Which best describes your relationship to the player you're evaluating?
- Head coach
- Assistant coach
- Scout / recruiter
- Teammate or peer
- Player self-assessment
Q02
マトリクス必須
Rate the player's current level on each technical skill.
5行 × 4列
- First touch and ball control
- Passing accuracy and range
- Finishing / shooting
- Dribbling under pressure
- 1v1 defending
列: Needs development · Developing · Solid · Strength
Q03
マトリクス必須
Rate the player's current level on each tactical / game-intelligence area.
4行 × 4列
- Positioning without the ball
- Decision-making under pressure
- Reading the game / anticipation
- Work rate transitioning between attack and defense
列: Needs development · Developing · Solid · Strength
Q04
スライダーマトリクス必須
Thinking about the last 5 matches or training sessions, rate the player on each physical attribute.
4行（各行にスライダー1つ）
- Overall physical conditioning in matches
- Speed / acceleration
- Aerial ability and strength in duels
- Recovery after high-intensity efforts
スライダー 0〜10最小:Far below level standard最大:Elite for this level
Q05
オピニオンスケール必須
Over the last 5 matches, how consistently did the player execute their primary tactical role as instructed?
スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Rarely executed it最大:Executed it every match
Q06
評価スケール必須
Overall, how would you rate this player's current performance level relative to peers at the same position and level?
範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Well below average最大:Well above average
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須
Which of these areas is the highest priority for this player's development right now, and which is the lowest?
- Finishing composure
- Passing range
- Defensive positioning
- Sprint speed
- Decision-making speed
- Leadership and communication
- Aerial duels
- Fitness / stamina
- Set-piece delivery
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Highest development priority最も悪い:Lowest development priority
Q08
AIインタビュー
Probe the area the evaluator marked as the highest development priority. Get a specific, recent match or training example that shows the gap in action — what happened, what the player did instead of the ideal action, and what got in the way (technique, decision-making, fitness, confidence). Ask what a realistic improvement would look like in the next 4-6 weeks, and if the evaluator seems unsure or gives only a generic answer, ask them to compare the player to a specific teammate or benchmark player who does it well.
Q09
選択式必須
What is your recommended next step for this player?
- Promote to a higher squad / starting role
- Maintain current role with a focused development plan
- Loan or move to a partner club for more playing time
- Release from the program
- Reassess in 3 months
Q10
選択式
Which age group does the player fall into?
- Under 16
- 16-18
- 19-21
- 22-25
- 26 and older
- Prefer not to say
メッセージ
Thank you for the detailed evaluation. Your ratings and follow-up interview responses will feed directly into this player's individual development plan.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Includes matrix and slider-matrix ratings across technical, tactical, and physical/mental attributes rather than a single generic scorecard
- Uses a MaxDiff question to force a clear top development priority instead of leaving all areas rated equally important
- Follows up the flagged priority area with an adaptive AI interview that asks for a concrete recent-match example, not just a numeric score
- Closes with a clear recommended-next-step question and auto-generated report, so coaches get a decision, not just raw ratings
Jotform
Soccer Player Evaluation Form TemplateA static, form-builder style soccer player evaluation template covering standard rating categories. It's built for quick customization and embedding (e.g., in club websites or PDFs) rather than for structured interview-style data collection. No mechanism to probe deeper into any single rated area.
優れている点
- Easy drag-and-drop customization of fields and layout
- Familiar Jotform ecosystem for embedding, notifications, and PDF export
- Likely quick to set up for coaches unfamiliar with survey tools
物足りない点
- Static rating fields only — no adaptive follow-up to dig into a specific weak area
- No built-in mechanism to force prioritization among competing development areas
- No transparent methodology or per-response quality scoring
SurveySparrow
Soccer Player Evaluation Form Template | For High Schools & ClubsA conversational-style survey template aimed at high school and club-level soccer evaluations. It benefits from SurveySparrow's chat-like UI for a friendlier fill-out experience, but the questions themselves remain fixed rather than adaptive to what an evaluator writes or selects. Positioned more for casual club use than rigorous development-priority scouting.
優れている点
- Conversational one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion experience
- Explicitly targeted at high schools and clubs, suggesting practical field-readiness
- Likely supports basic branching logic typical of SurveySparrow forms
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe a flagged development priority with real examples
- No structured prioritization step (like a forced-choice ranking) to isolate the single biggest development need
- No transparent, publishable interview prompts or automated quality scoring of responses
Typeform
Soccer Player Evaluation Form TemplateA visually polished, conversational form template in Typeform's signature style, good for capturing basic ratings and comments on a player's performance. It's a fixed-question template with no logic beyond simple branching, and it isn't designed to extract a concrete recent-match example from evaluators. Best suited for lightweight, one-off evaluations rather than structured development planning.
優れている点
- Polished, engaging one-question-per-screen design likely improves response rates
- Easy to customize question wording and branding within Typeform's editor
- Familiar tool for many coaches/scouts already using Typeform for other forms
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview to follow up on whichever area an evaluator flags as the top priority
- No slider-matrix or MaxDiff-style prioritization mechanism to force ranking of development areas
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated development report
よくあるご質問
「Soccer Player Development & Performance Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？
すぐに使える設問が10問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Which best describes your relationship to the player you're evaluating?」・「Rate the player's current level on each technical skill.」・「Rate the player's current level on each tactical / game-intelligence area.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？
回答者は通常、10問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか？
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか？
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。
