QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation

Captures how a group or team performed on a shared project — coordination, workload fairness, communication, and overall output quality — for managers, educators, or project leads reviewing team dynamics after a collaboration ends. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision that most helped or hurt the group's performance, going beyond generic ratings.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your recent group project or team collaboration. Your honest input helps improve how teams are formed and supported going forward. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
自由回答（短文）必須

Which group, team, or project are you evaluating? (Replace with your specific team/project name if this is being sent for a single group.)

Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how well did this group achieve the goals it set out to accomplish?

スケール: 1 – 10
最小:Did not achieve goals最大:Fully achieved goals
Q04
マトリクス必須

Rate the group on each of the following aspects of how it worked together.

5行 × 5列
  • Communication among members
  • Coordination and planning
  • Handling of disagreements or conflict
  • Quality of the final output
  • Meeting deadlines
列: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
選択式必須

How was the workload distributed among group members?

  • Very unevenly - a few people did most of the work
  • Somewhat unevenly
  • Fairly evenly
  • Very evenly - everyone contributed similarly
Q06
ランク付け必須

Rank the following factors by how much they affected this group's performance, from biggest impact to smallest.

  1. Clarity of roles and responsibilities
  2. Quality of communication
  3. Leadership within the group
  4. Skills and experience of members
  5. Time and resources available
  6. Personal motivation of members
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these teamwork behaviors mattered most, and which mattered least, to how well this group performed?

  • Clear roles from the start
  • Timely, responsive communication
  • Mutual respect between members
  • Equal effort from everyone
  • Constructive conflict resolution
  • Shared decision-making
  • Accountability for missed commitments
  • Flexibility when plans changed
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Mattered most最も悪い:Mattered least
Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely would you be to want to work with this same group again on a future project?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
AIインタビュー

Probe the specific incident or decision that most shaped this respondent's rating of the group's performance — anchor on the lowest-rated item from the teamwork matrix (communication, coordination, conflict, output quality, or deadlines) and ask for a concrete example of what happened. If they flagged uneven workload, ask who they felt over- or under-contributed and what could have rebalanced it. If ratings were uniformly high, ask what specific practice the group should keep doing on its next project.

Q10
自由回答（長文）

Is there anything else about how this group worked together that these questions didn't capture?

Q11
選択式

What was your role in this group?

  • Group lead / coordinator
  • Regular member/contributor
  • Supporting or advisory role
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

How large was this group?

  • 2-3 people
  • 4-6 people
  • 7-10 people
  • More than 10 people
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
メッセージ

Thank you for sharing your perspective! Responses across the group will be combined into a summary report used to improve how future teams are set up and supported — individual answers are not shared with teammates.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific incident or decision that most shaped a respondent's scores, rather than stopping at a number.
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scales on goal achievement, a matrix rating teamwork dimensions, ranking and max-diff on performance factors) with open reflection, giving both quantifiable and narrative data.
  • Captures context that matters for interpreting results — workload distribution, role in the group, and group size — so managers or educators can segment findings accurately.
  • Automatically compiles individual responses into a report, saving the manual synthesis work required after fielding a static form.

Jotform

Group Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use static form template for rating group work, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize fields and branding, but it is a fixed-question form rather than an interview experience. Good for quick, low-cost data collection without deeper follow-up.

優れている点

  • Fast to customize and deploy via drag-and-drop builder
  • Part of a large existing template library for quick starting points
  • Familiar, simple form format for respondents

物足りない点

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed items
  • No AI or voice interview capability to probe specific incidents
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

Typeform

Group Evaluation Form Template

Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time format makes filling out a group evaluation feel more engaging than a traditional form. It still relies on pre-set static questions, so any deeper context has to come from open-text fields read manually. Best suited for a pleasant respondent experience rather than adaptive probing.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational UI that can improve completion rates
  • Simple sharing and embedding
  • Clean visual design out of the box

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — the flow is scripted regardless of answers given
  • No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No automated scoring or report generation; results still need manual interpretation

QuestionPro

Performance Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a general performance evaluation questionnaire and question-bank resource rather than a template built specifically for team/group project reviews. It offers enterprise survey features and analytics dashboards, but the sample questions are broad and would need significant editing for team-collaboration context. Reads more like a guide with sample items than a fielding-ready group project template.

優れている点

  • Enterprise-grade survey platform with analytics dashboards
  • Large bank of sample performance-review questions to draw from
  • Established platform with broad survey logic and reporting features

物足りない点

  • Not purpose-built for team/group project dynamics — questions are generic performance-review items needing rework
  • No adaptive AI or voice interview to dig into specific team incidents
  • No transparent, published interview-prompt methodology or automated quality scoring per response

よくあるご質問

「Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your recent group project or team collaboration. Your honest input helps i…」・「Which group, team, or project are you evaluating? (Replace with your specific team/project name if this is being sent fo…」・「Overall, how well did this group achieve the goals it set out to accomplish?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Candidate Interview Scheduling Experience Survey

Captures how smooth or frustrating candidates found the process of scheduling their job interview — from first contact to joining the call or arriving on-site. Built for talent acquisition and recruiting ops teams who want to spot friction before it costs them strong candidates, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment scheduling went wrong (or right).

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Group Project Peer Evaluation Survey

Captures how students rate a teammate's contribution, communication, reliability, and work quality on a shared project, plus how they'd split credit across the team. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific behavior behind the rating instead of settling for a vague number, giving instructors evidence to catch free-riders and recognize strong collaborators.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation

Evaluates how well a team communicates, makes decisions, shares workload, and supports its members — straight from the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR running regular team health checks, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind whatever obstacle or low score members flagged, not just the number they gave it.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Team Performance & Collaboration Pulse Check

Measures how a team is actually performing — goal clarity, communication, accountability, and delivery speed — from the perspective of the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR/People teams running quarterly or post-project pulse checks. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the biggest rated gap instead of leaving it as a vague score.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Cross-Department Performance & Collaboration Review

Captures how internal stakeholders experience working with a specific department — responsiveness, quality, communication, and reliability — plus a trade-off exercise on what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent interaction behind the numbers so leaders get concrete, fixable detail instead of vague ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey

Captures direct reports' candid ratings of their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and follow-through, plus a best-worst trade-off on which leadership qualities most need development. The AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete story behind the lowest-rated behavior instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る