すべてのテンプレート
Operations & Data

Staff Crisis Communication Readiness Survey

Assesses how prepared staff feel to communicate during a crisis — protocol awareness, spokesperson clarity, channel reliability, and drill experience — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real or simulated crisis moment to surface exactly where confusion or delay actually occurs.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全13問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us assess how ready we really are to communicate clearly if a crisis hits. Your honest answers — not what you think we want to hear — will shape training and channel fixes. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
マトリクス必須

Please rate your agreement with each statement about crisis communication protocols.

4行 × 5列
  • I know where to find our crisis communication plan
  • I know who to contact first if I suspect an incident is unfolding
  • I understand what information I am authorized to share externally without approval
  • I know the escalation path for reporting a developing crisis
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
選択式必須

Do you know who is authorized to speak to media, customers, or the public on behalf of the organization during a crisis?

  • Yes, I know exactly who
  • I have a general idea
  • No, I don't know
  • Not applicable to my role
Q04
評価スケール必須

How reliable is (Replace with your primary emergency notification system, e.g., mass text alert system) at reaching you during a crisis? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual system name before launching.)

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very unreliable最大:Very reliable
Q05
選択式必須

Which communication channels have actually reached you, or would you trust to reach you, during a real crisis? Select all that apply.

  • Email
  • SMS/text alert
  • Company intranet or portal
  • Phone tree / direct call
  • Social media
  • Instant messaging app (e.g., Slack, Teams)
  • Physical signage or in-person briefing
Q06
ランク付け必須

Rank these channels in the order you would want to receive crisis information, from most preferred to least.

  1. Email
  2. SMS/text alert
  3. Phone call
  4. Instant messaging app
  5. Company intranet
  6. In-person briefing
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that leadership would communicate clearly, promptly, and honestly with staff during an actual crisis?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q08
選択式必須

How long ago did you last participate in a crisis communication drill, tabletop exercise, or simulation?

  • Within the last 3 months
  • 4-6 months ago
  • 7-12 months ago
  • More than a year ago
  • I have never participated in one
Q09
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the most recent moment the respondent needed crisis-related information at work — whether a real incident or a drill — and walk through exactly what happened: which channel alerted them, whether it actually worked, whether they knew who to contact or who was authorized to speak externally, and where confusion or delay crept in. If they say they've 'never participated' in a drill, probe what they think would happen if a real crisis hit today and what single piece of training would close that gap.

Q10
自由回答(長文)

What's the one change that would most improve your confidence in our crisis communication readiness?

Q11
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for your candor. These answers directly inform where we tighten protocols, clarify spokesperson authority, and shore up unreliable channels before a real crisis tests them.

Q12
プルダウン

Which department or team are you part of? (Template note: replace this list with your organization's actual departments before launching.)

  • (Replace with Department A)
  • (Replace with Department B)
  • (Replace with Department C)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

How long have you worked at the organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-9 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

このテンプレートの設計意図をご紹介します。ほかのアンケートツールには、直接比較できるテンプレートが見つかりませんでした。

ここが違う

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that reconstructs a real or simulated crisis moment to pinpoint exactly where confusion or delay happened, not just self-reported readiness
  • Combines protocol-awareness matrix, spokesperson-authorization multiple-choice, and channel-reliability rating so gaps in knowledge vs. trust vs. delivery are separated rather than blended into one score
  • Captures actual drill recency and channel ranking (which channels people would trust in a real crisis) alongside rating-scale confidence in leadership, giving both objective history and perception data
  • Closes with an open open-ended on the single change that would most improve confidence, plus department/tenure breakdowns, so results can be segmented and turned into concrete follow-up actions

よくあるご質問

「Staff Crisis Communication Readiness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to help us assess how ready we really are to communicate clearly if a crisis hits. Your…」・「Please rate your agreement with each statement about crisis communication protocols.」・「Do you know who is authorized to speak to media, customers, or the public on behalf of the organization during a crisis?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る