すべてのテンプレート
Operations & Data

Incident Communication & Stakeholder Update Survey

Evaluates the timeliness, clarity, channel effectiveness, and overall quality of incident communications from stakeholders' perspectives to identify actionable improvements in crisis response.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全21問・約10分
Q01
メッセージ

Thank you for participating in this survey about our incident communication. We want to understand your experience with how we communicated during a recent incident so we can improve. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes. Your participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.

Q02
プルダウン

When did you most recently receive an incident communication from us?

  • In the past 7 days
  • 8–30 days ago
  • 31–60 days ago
  • More than 60 days ago
  • I don't recall
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How timely was the first notification you received about that incident?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all timely最大:Extremely timely
Q04
選択式

Which communication channels did you use or notice during that incident? (Select all that apply.)

  • Email
  • SMS/text
  • In-app or push notification
  • Status page
  • Phone call
  • Social media
  • Dashboard/banner
  • Other (please specify)
Q05
オピニオンスケール

How clear was the description of the incident's impact on your services or workflows?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q06
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how would you rate the communication you received for that incident?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very poor最大:Excellent
Q07
AIインタビュー

Thinking about the incident communication you evaluated in this survey, what worked well and what could be improved? Please share your thoughts and we'll follow up with a few questions.

Q08
プルダウン

What is your primary role?

  • Developer
  • SRE/Operations
  • Security
  • Product/Project management
  • Customer support
  • Executive/Leadership
  • Procurement/Vendor management
  • Other
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. Your responses will help us improve how we communicate during incidents. If you have any questions about this survey, please contact our team.

Q10
プルダウン

Approximately how long after the incident started did you receive the first notification?

  • Under 1 hour
  • 1–2 hours
  • 3–6 hours
  • 7–12 hours
  • 13–24 hours
  • 25–48 hours
  • More than 48 hours
  • Not sure
Q11
ランク付け

Of the channels you used, rank them by usefulness for this incident (top = most useful).

  1. Email
  2. SMS/text
  3. In-app or push notification
  4. Status page
  5. Phone call
  6. Social media
  7. Dashboard/banner
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q12
オピニオンスケール

How clear were the progress updates provided during the incident?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q13
オピニオンスケール

How confident are you that you will be kept appropriately informed during a future incident?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q14
自由回答(長文)

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about our incident communications?

Q15
プルダウン

Which region are you primarily located in?

  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • Middle East & Africa
  • Asia
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
オピニオンスケール

How would you describe the frequency of updates you received during the incident?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Far too infrequent最大:Far too frequent
Q17
オピニオンスケール

How clear was the resolution summary once the incident was resolved?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q18
プルダウン

Approximately how many employees are in your organization?

  • 1–49
  • 50–249
  • 250–999
  • 1,000–4,999
  • 5,000+
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
選択式

During a major incident, how often would you prefer to receive updates?

  • Every 15 minutes
  • Every 30 minutes
  • Hourly
  • Every 2–3 hours
  • Only when status changes
  • Only at start and resolution
Q20
オピニオンスケール

How clear was the root cause explanation provided after the incident?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all clear最大:Extremely clear
Q21
プルダウン

How long have you used our product or service?

  • Under 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • More than 3 years
  • Not sure

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Pairs opinion-scale ratings on timeliness, update frequency, and clarity of impact/progress/resolution/root-cause explanations with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively asks stakeholders what worked and what didn't about that specific incident.
  • Uses multiple-choice and ranking questions to capture which channels stakeholders actually noticed and found most useful during the incident, not just an overall satisfaction score.
  • Segments results by role, region, organization size, and tenure with the product, so gaps in timeliness or clarity can be filtered by stakeholder group.
  • Closes with an open-text reflection question after the AI interview, feeding into an auto-generated report rather than requiring manual read-through of every response.

Jotform

Quality Incident Treatment Feedback Form Template

A static, drag-and-drop form for collecting feedback on how a quality incident was handled and resolved. It's fielding-ready out of the box but built as a fixed question list rather than a dynamic interview, so depth of insight depends entirely on how many questions you manually add. Good for quick deployment, less suited to probing nuance around communication quality specifically.

優れている点

  • Easy to customize with Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Can integrate with Jotform's broader ecosystem (notifications, e-signature, workflow tools)
  • Quick to deploy for basic post-incident feedback collection

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on individual responses
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

QuestionPro

Company Communication Survey | Communication survey questions

A general internal-communications evaluation template rather than one built around incident response specifically; it would need substantial customization to cover incident timeliness, channel effectiveness, or root-cause clarity. It's a standard static template on an enterprise survey platform with its own reporting tools, not an incident-specific instrument.

優れている点

  • Covers broad organizational communication satisfaction themes
  • Backed by QuestionPro's enterprise survey platform with analytics and reporting
  • Likely supports multiple standard question types for customization

物足りない点

  • Not tailored to incident-specific timelines, channels, or resolution/root-cause clarity
  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning based on individual answers
  • Static template requiring manual analysis of open-ended feedback rather than automated scoring or report generation

よくあるご質問

「Incident Communication & Stakeholder Update Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が21問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thank you for participating in this survey about our incident communication. We want to understand your experience with…」・「When did you most recently receive an incident communication from us?」・「How timely was the first notification you received about that incident?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、21問を約10分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る