すべてのテンプレート
Sustainability & Impact

Time-of-Use & Dynamic Electricity Pricing Acceptance Survey

Measures residential electricity customers' acceptance of time-of-use (TOU) and dynamic pricing plans, perceived fairness, enrollment intent, and preferred program features. Suitable for utilities and energy researchers designing or evaluating variable-rate programs.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全29問・約12分
Q01
メッセージ

Thank you for participating in this study about electricity pricing options. Your responses are completely confidential and will be analyzed only in aggregate to inform energy program design. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. This survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may skip any question or stop at any time.

Q02
選択式

Do you pay or share responsibility for your household's electricity bill?

  • Yes, I pay it myself
  • Yes, I share responsibility
  • No, someone else pays
Q03
オピニオンスケール

How familiar are you with time-of-use (TOU) or dynamic electricity rates?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all familiar最大:Extremely familiar
Q04
プルダウン

How long have you been on your current TOU or dynamic pricing plan?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • More than 2 years
Q05
オピニオンスケール

If a TOU or dynamic pricing plan were available to you, how likely would you be to enroll in the next 6 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q06
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree or disagree: TOU or dynamic pricing is a fair way to charge for electricity.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q07
AIインタビュー

Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about electricity pricing, fairness, or what would make time-based pricing work better for you.

Q08
プルダウン

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
メッセージ

Thank you for your time—your feedback is very valuable and will help shape fairer electricity pricing options. You may now close this window.

Q10
メッセージ

TOU rates charge different prices at different times of day (e.g., higher during peak hours, lower off-peak). Dynamic rates change more frequently (e.g., daily or hourly) based on electricity grid conditions. Both are designed to reward shifting usage to lower-cost, less congested times.

Q11
オピニオンスケール

Overall, how satisfied are you with your TOU or dynamic pricing plan?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Not at all satisfied最大:Extremely satisfied
Q12
ランク付け

Please rank the following barriers to enrolling in a TOU or dynamic pricing plan from most important to least important.

  1. Unclear or uncertain cost savings
  2. Difficulty shifting usage due to work or family schedule
  3. Worry about bill spikes or financial risk
  4. Lack of smart home technology (e.g., smart thermostat, smart plugs)
  5. Distrust of utility, provider, or program
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q13
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree or disagree: People who use electricity at off-peak times should pay less than those who use it at peak times.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q14
選択式

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
選択式

In the past 12 months, did your electricity bill increase noticeably in any month compared to what you expected?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q16
オピニオンスケール

Since enrolling in your current plan, how has the predictability of your electricity bill changed?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Much less predictable最大:Much more predictable
Q17
選択式

Which of the following program features would make you more comfortable trying a TOU or dynamic pricing plan? Select all that apply.

  • Bill protection for the first 3 months
  • Personalized savings estimate before enrolling
  • Alerts before high-price hours
  • Rebates or discounts on smart devices
  • Easy opt-out at any time with no penalty
  • Live support to help plan usage
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q18
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree or disagree: Variable electricity pricing could create hardship for people on fixed incomes or with inflexible schedules.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q19
プルダウン

Which country do you currently live in?

  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia
  • Other
Q20
選択式

Which best describes your current electricity pricing plan?

  • Flat, fixed per-kWh rate
  • Time-of-use (TOU) pricing
  • Dynamic or real-time pricing
  • Prepay plan
  • Not sure
Q21
オピニオンスケール

How likely are you to opt out of your current TOU or dynamic pricing plan in the next 12 months?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Very unlikely最大:Very likely
Q22
オピニオンスケール

To what extent do you agree or disagree: I trust my electricity provider to implement time-based pricing in a way that benefits customers.

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Strongly disagree最大:Strongly agree
Q23
選択式

What is your current housing situation?

  • Own
  • Rent
  • Live with parents or relatives
  • Other
Q24
オピニオンスケール

How acceptable would it be to have up to 10 'critical peak' days per year when electricity prices are approximately double from 4–6 PM, with notice given one day ahead?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Completely unacceptable最大:Completely acceptable
Q25
プルダウン

Including yourself, how many people currently live in your household?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6 or more
Q26
ランク付け

Please rank the following pricing design goals from most important to least important to you.

  1. Lower average electricity cost
  2. Predictable monthly bills
  3. Simple and transparent pricing structure
  4. Environmental benefits (e.g., less grid strain)
  5. Rewards for shifting usage to off-peak times
  6. Bill protections during extreme weather events
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q27
選択式

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college / Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q28
選択式

What is your current employment status?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Not employed
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say
Q29
選択式

Which best describes the area where you live?

  • Urban
  • Suburban
  • Rural

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that probes each respondent's own answers for open-ended context on their pricing attitudes, not just a generic open-text box
  • Combines attitudinal opinion-scale items (fairness, trust, predictability, acceptability of critical peak days) with ranking exercises on barriers and pricing-design priorities, giving both quantitative and preference-ranked data
  • Segments respondents by current plan status and tenure (dropdown on how long they've been enrolled) so utilities can compare enrolled vs. not-yet-enrolled customers within one instrument
  • Captures full demographic and housing context (household size, housing situation, area type) needed to model enrollment intent and fairness perceptions across customer segments

QuestionPro

Concept Evaluation and Pricing Study Survey Templates

This is a generic concept/pricing evaluation template rather than one built for electricity rate structures, TOU billing, or utility program design specifically. It's useful as a general pricing-acceptance framework but would need heavy customization to cover critical peak pricing, enrollment barriers, or utility trust dimensions. Best viewed as a category-level pricing template, not a fielding-ready energy survey.

優れている点

  • Established survey platform with broad question-library support for pricing research
  • Template is framed around general concept and price-sensitivity testing, which is a reasonable starting structure for willingness-to-pay questions

物足りない点

  • No utility- or energy-specific content (no TOU mechanics, critical peak days, or plan-tenure segmentation)
  • Static question-and-answer format with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a respondent finds a rate fair or unfair
  • No published methodology showing how quality scoring or response validation is handled

よくあるご質問

「Time-of-Use & Dynamic Electricity Pricing Acceptance Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が29問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thank you for participating in this study about electricity pricing options. Your responses are completely confidential…」・「Do you pay or share responsibility for your household's electricity bill?」・「How familiar are you with time-of-use (TOU) or dynamic electricity rates?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、29問を約12分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る