Work From Home Efficiency and Productivity Survey
Measures how productive, focused, and supported employees feel while working remotely, and pinpoints the specific barriers eating into their day. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest barrier each person identifies, reconstructing a real recent workday instead of relying on generalized complaints.
設問の例
テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。
In a typical week, how many days do you work from home?
- 0 days
- 1-2 days
- 3-4 days
- 5 days (fully remote)
Compared to working from an office or shared workspace, how would you rate your overall productivity when working from home?
How much do you agree with each statement about your remote work setup?
- I can focus without frequent interruptions
- I have reliable technology and tools
- I can collaborate easily with teammates
- I maintain a healthy work-life balance
- I have a dedicated, ergonomic workspace
Which of these gets in the way of your productivity the most, and which the least?
- Home distractions (family, chores, pets)
- Unreliable internet or technology
- Lack of a separate workspace
- Too many virtual meetings
- Difficulty collaborating with colleagues
- Blurred boundaries between work and personal time
- Lack of manager visibility or trust
- Feeling isolated or lonely
Thinking of a typical 8-hour workday, how do you actually spend your time? Split 100 points across these categories based on how much time each really takes.
- Focused individual work
- Meetings and calls
- Email and messaging
- Administrative tasks
- Breaks and personal time
How would you rate your home internet connection and work technology (laptop, monitor, software access)?
On average, how many hours do you work in a typical week, including any after-hours or weekend work?
In the last 5 workdays, how many times did you lose 7 minutes or more of focus due to a home distraction?
- 0 times
- 1-2 times
- 3-5 times
- 6-10 times
- More than 10 times
Anchor on the barrier the respondent ranked as biggest in the best-worst trade-off question and ask them to walk through the last time it actually disrupted their work: what they were trying to do, what happened, and how they recovered (or didn't). If their productivity rating was low, probe whether it stems from that same barrier or something separate. Push past generic answers like 'distractions' to get a concrete, specific incident.
Which best describes your role or department?
- (Replace with Department A, e.g. Sales)
- (Replace with Department B, e.g. Engineering)
- (Replace with Department C, e.g. Customer Support)
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been working remotely in your current role?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-3 years
- More than 3 years
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your responses will be combined into a report on how we can better support remote and hybrid work across the team.
含まれる機能
AIによる深掘り
自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。
注意確認設問
急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。
AIが作成する設問文
文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。
自動レポート
回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。
他ツールとの比較
ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。
このテンプレートを選ぶ理由
- Goes beyond a generic satisfaction checklist by using a max-diff trade-off to identify each respondent's single biggest productivity barrier, then an AI follow-up interview digs into that specific barrier by reconstructing a real recent workday instead of relying on generalized complaints.
- Combines quantitative structure (matrix agreement ratings, constant-sum time allocation across an 8-hour day, opinion scale comparison to office work) with open-ended depth, so you get both benchmarkable metrics and rich qualitative context.
- Captures concrete behavioral signals — like how many times focus was lost 15+ minutes in the last 5 workdays and how work hours actually break down — rather than only asking respondents to self-rate abstractly.
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean the nuanced AI interview answers get synthesized for you, not left as a pile of unstructured text to manually code.
QuestionPro
Work from home efficiency survey template + Sample questionnaireA ready-to-field sample questionnaire covering WFH efficiency topics similar in theme to ours. It's a static question set aimed at broad benchmarking rather than probing any individual respondent's specific situation in depth. Good starting point if you just need standard questions to launch quickly.
優れている点
- Purpose-built WFH efficiency questionnaire
- Established survey platform with broad question-library support
- Likely offers customization within their standard survey builder
物足りない点
- Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up that reconstructs a respondent's actual workday
- No mention of voice AI interviewing or automated per-response quality scoring
- No transparent, inspectable interview prompts
SurveyMonkey
Remote Work Check-In Survey TemplateFramed as a check-in survey, originally built for pandemic-era remote work monitoring, so it leans toward pulse/wellbeing tracking rather than a deep dive on productivity barriers. It's a static template usable within SurveyMonkey's standard builder. Useful for quick, recurring check-ins rather than root-cause diagnosis.
優れている点
- Simple, quick check-in format
- Backed by a well-known, widely used survey platform
- Easy to distribute to large employee populations
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into an individual's specific biggest barrier
- No structured trade-off ranking (e.g., max-diff) to isolate the top productivity blocker
- No automated quality scoring or AI-generated synthesis of open responses
SurveySparrow
Work From Home Survey TemplateA conversational-style WFH experience template, consistent with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It covers general remote work experience questions but appears to be a fixed script rather than one that adapts based on each respondent's flagged biggest issue. Reasonable for a lightweight experience pulse rather than a diagnostic productivity audit.
優れている点
- Conversational, chat-style question flow that may feel more engaging
- Covers general remote work experience themes
- Part of an established survey platform ecosystem
物足りない点
- No adaptive AI interview that reconstructs a specific workday around the respondent's top-ranked barrier
- No voice AI interview option
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response scoring
よくあるご質問
「Work From Home Efficiency and Productivity Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?
すぐに使える設問が13問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how remote work is going for you! Your honest answers help us improve tools, po…」・「In a typical week, how many days do you work from home?」・「Compared to working from an office or shared workspace, how would you rate your overall productivity when working from h…」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。
このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?
回答者は通常、13問を約7分で回答し終えます。
テンプレートは編集できますか?
はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。
このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?
はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。
公開の準備はできましたか?
このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。
関連テンプレート
似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。