すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Workplace Diversity and Inclusion Climate Survey

Measures how included, respected, and fairly treated employees feel across belonging, fairness, and access to opportunity, plus whether they've witnessed or experienced exclusionary behavior. Built for HR and DEI teams benchmarking climate over time. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment behind a respondent's inclusion score instead of leaving it as just a number.

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全14問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience at work. This helps us understand where inclusion is working and where it isn't — your answers are anonymous and there are no right answers. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how included do you feel at your organization?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all included最大:Extremely included
Q03
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience?

4行 × 5列
  • I can bring my authentic self to work without fear of judgment
  • My manager treats people fairly regardless of their background
  • I have the same access to growth and advancement opportunities as my peers
  • Leaders here are held accountable for building an inclusive culture
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
選択式必須

In the last 12 months, have you personally experienced or witnessed behavior at work that made someone feel excluded or unfairly treated?

  • Yes, I personally experienced it
  • Yes, I witnessed it happen to someone else
  • Yes, both
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q05
選択式

Which of the following have you personally used or benefited from in the last year?

  • Mentorship or sponsorship program
  • Employee resource group (ERG) or affinity network
  • Flexible work arrangements
  • Manager check-ins focused on inclusion
  • Bias-awareness or inclusion training
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択(MaxDiff)必須

Which of these initiatives do you think would do the most, and the least, to improve inclusion at your organization?

  • Pay equity transparency
  • Manager training on unconscious bias
  • Flexible work and accommodation policies
  • Employee resource groups and affinity networks
  • Diverse interview panels for hiring
  • Mentorship and sponsorship programs
  • Clear, published criteria for promotion
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most improve inclusion最も悪い:Least improve inclusion
Q07
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that reporting a concern about unfair treatment or exclusion would be taken seriously here?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the specific experience behind the respondent's inclusion score: ask for a concrete recent moment (positive or negative) that shaped how included they feel, who was involved, and what happened. If they said they experienced or witnessed exclusionary behavior, probe what occurred, whether it was addressed, and by whom. If their confidence in reporting concerns was low, ask what would need to change for them to trust the process. If they decline to share specifics, ask instead what one change would most improve how included they feel.

Q09
メッセージ

Just a few optional questions about you — these help us see whether experiences differ across groups so we can act on real gaps, not averages.

Q10
選択式

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How do you describe your race or ethnicity? Select all that apply.

  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino/a/x
  • Middle Eastern or North African
  • Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
  • White
  • Two or more races
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
選択式

What is your age range?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
選択式

How long have you worked at your organization?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • More than 15 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
メッセージ

Thank you for your honesty. Responses are combined into an anonymized report the DEI and leadership teams use to prioritize concrete changes, not to identify individuals.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Goes beyond a single inclusion score with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment behind a respondent's rating, not just a number on a scale
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scale, matrix, max-diff on initiative priorities) with open-ended probing, so HR/DEI teams get both trend data and the 'why' behind it
  • Includes a confidence-in-reporting question and an experienced/witnessed exclusion item, giving a fuller climate picture than belonging alone
  • Transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring mean DEI teams can audit how the AI is interviewing respondents and trust the auto-generated report

QuestionPro

Diversity and Inclusion Survey Questionnaire

A fielding-ready questionnaire template from an established enterprise survey platform, covering standard D&I question areas. It's a fixed question set rather than an adaptive interview, so all respondents get the same static items regardless of their answers. Good for teams wanting a straightforward, customizable questionnaire without conversational AI.

優れている点

  • Backed by a mature, enterprise-grade survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Likely offers standard analytics/dashboards for benchmarking over time
  • Easy to customize as a static questionnaire

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the specific experience behind a low inclusion score
  • No voice AI interview option mentioned
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored for quality

Jotform

Questionnaire for Equity & Managing Diversity at workplace Form Template

A form-builder template focused on equity and diversity management questions, well-suited for quick deployment via Jotform's drag-and-drop editor. It's a static form rather than a guided interview, so it collects answers without follow-up probing. Best for teams that just need a simple, editable intake form.

優れている点

  • Simple drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform
  • Fast to deploy for basic data collection
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (e.g., payment/logic add-ons)

物足りない点

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI interview or voice option
  • No mechanism to reconstruct the story behind a respondent's rating
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

SurveySparrow

Workplace Diversity Questionnaire Template

SurveySparrow's conversational, chat-style survey format makes this diversity questionnaire feel more engaging than a plain form, one question at a time. However, the conversational flow is still pre-scripted rather than AI-adaptive, so it can't generate follow-up questions based on an individual's specific answer. Suitable for teams wanting a friendlier UI without AI-driven probing.

優れている点

  • Conversational, one-at-a-time UI likely improves completion rates
  • Template covers standard workplace diversity question areas
  • Part of a platform with broader survey distribution and reporting tools

物足りない点

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive — no AI-generated follow-up based on a respondent's specific answer
  • No voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent, publishable prompt methodology or per-response quality scoring

Typeform

Diversity and Inclusion Survey Template

Typeform's template offers its signature clean, one-question-at-a-time design, which tends to feel more personal than a dense form. It remains a fixed set of questions, however, with branching logic at most, not true AI-generated follow-ups tailored to each response. A solid choice for a polished static survey, less suited if the goal is to capture the specific story behind each score.

優れている点

  • Polished, well-known one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Easy embedding and sharing, popular with HR teams
  • Supports basic logic jumps for some personalization

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct the moment behind an inclusion score
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt documentation

よくあるご質問

「Workplace Diversity and Inclusion Climate Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか?

すぐに使える設問が14問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです:「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience at work. This helps us understand where inclusion is working an…」・「Overall, how included do you feel at your organization?」・「How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか?

回答者は通常、14問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか?

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか?

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか?

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る