QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey

Captures direct reports' candid ratings of their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and follow-through, plus a best-worst trade-off on which leadership qualities most need development. The AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete story behind the lowest-rated behavior instead of settling for a number.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback on your manager. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your responses are used to support their development, not to penalize them — this should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
マトリクス必須

Thinking about the last few months, how often has your manager done each of the following?

6行 × 5列
  • Gives clear direction on priorities
  • Provides timely, actionable feedback
  • Recognizes good work
  • Advocates for the team's needs
  • Handles conflict fairly
  • ほか1件
列: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Always
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how effective is your manager at leading and supporting your team?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not effective at all最大:Extremely effective
Q04
選択式必須

In the last 30 days, how often did your manager give you feedback on your work (positive or constructive)?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • A few times
  • About weekly
  • More than once a week
Q05
評価スケール必須

How would you rate the clarity of your manager's communication about goals and expectations?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Very unclear最大:Very clear
Q06
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these qualities matter most for your manager to develop further?

  • Clear communication of goals
  • Recognizing good work
  • Fair distribution of workload
  • Supporting career growth
  • Making timely decisions
  • Resolving conflicts fairly
  • Being approachable
  • Setting a clear strategic direction
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Most important to develop最も悪い:Least important to develop
Q07
選択式

In the last 3 months, how has your manager recognized your good work? (Select all that apply)

  • Public praise in team meetings
  • Private thank-you or note
  • Formal recognition program or award
  • Extra opportunities or interesting projects
  • Pay or bonus adjustment
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct a specific recent moment that shaped the respondent's overall effectiveness rating for their manager, especially if it diverges from their frequency ratings. Probe the lowest-rated behavior area (feedback, recognition, conflict resolution, follow-through) for a concrete example of what happened and what the manager could have done differently. If the respondent rated everything high, ask what one thing would make an already-good manager even better; if they rated most things low, ask what single change would most improve their day-to-day experience.

Q09
プルダウン

How long have you reported to your current manager?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
選択式

Which department do you work in? (Template note: replace these department options with your own organizational list before launching.)

  • (Replace with Department A)
  • (Replace with Department B)
  • (Replace with Department C)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

What is your employment type?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Contractor
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

Thank you for your honest feedback! Your ratings and comments will be aggregated with your team's responses to support your manager's development plan — individual answers are never shared verbatim.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a matrix of specific manager behaviors (communication, feedback, recognition, follow-through) plus a direct opinion-scale rating of overall leadership effectiveness
  • Uses a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off to force-rank which leadership qualities most need development, avoiding flat 'everything is important' results
  • Pairs the quantitative ratings with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific recent moment behind the respondent's lowest-rated behavior, turning a number into a concrete story
  • Captures context (tenure with manager, department, employment type) so results can be segmented, and closes with a transparent note on how responses will be aggregated

Jotform

Management Performance Survey Form Template

A ready-to-field static form for gathering feedback on a manager's performance, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. Good for quick deployment and basic customization, but it relies on fixed question sets with no mechanism to probe deeper into any single answer. There's no published scoring methodology for responses.

優れている点

  • Fielding-ready template usable immediately
  • Familiar drag-and-drop customization via Jotform's builder
  • Easy integration with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (payments, notifications, etc.)

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up when a rating is low
  • No voice interview or screen-share task option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

SurveyMonkey

Management Performance Survey Template

A standard fielding-ready survey template from an established survey platform, likely covering common manager-effectiveness dimensions with SurveyMonkey's usual analytics dashboard. It's built for broad distribution and benchmarking rather than deep qualitative follow-up. Reporting is templated rather than generated per respondent story.

優れている点

  • Established platform with strong distribution and panel options
  • Built-in analytics and benchmarking dashboards
  • Quick to launch with minimal setup

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into the story behind a low rating
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No transparent, response-level prompt or scoring methodology published

Typeform

Performance Management Survey Template

A conversational-style static template from Typeform focused on performance management generally; it may need adaptation to specifically target direct-report ratings of a manager's leadership. Typeform's format is friendly and mobile-first, but questions are fixed once published. There is no mechanism to automatically follow up on a specific low score with further questioning.

優れている点

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UX
  • Mobile-friendly design that can improve completion rates
  • Easy visual customization to match branding

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview capability
  • No guided screen-share task option for gathering evidence
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure

よくあるご質問

「Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback on your manager. Your responses are completely confidential and…」・「Thinking about the last few months, how often has your manager done each of the following?」・「Overall, how effective is your manager at leading and supporting your team?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Candidate Recruitment Experience Survey

Measures how candidates experienced your hiring process — from application clarity through interview scheduling, communication, and final outcome — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that made or broke their experience. Built for talent acquisition teams benchmarking and improving candidate experience.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Manager Effectiveness & Upward Feedback Survey

Captures how direct reports experience their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and support — with a rating battery, a prioritization exercise on where to improve, and an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their satisfaction score. Built for HR teams and leaders running 360 or upward-feedback cycles.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Senior Management Leadership Evaluation Survey

Gathers employee ratings of senior leadership on vision, decision-making, transparency, and accountability, plus behavioral data on how often leaders are visible day-to-day. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific decision or moment that most shaped each person's confidence — surfacing concrete evidence behind the scores for HR and the executive team.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Sales Leadership Style & Team Impact Survey

Captures how sales reps experience their manager's leadership style — coaching cadence, decision-making approach, and communication under quota pressure — and links it to motivation and performance. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent moment behind the overall rating, surfacing what great (or missing) sales leadership actually looks like day to day.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Supervisor Performance Evaluation Survey

Measures how employees experience their direct supervisor's communication, fairness, support, and recognition. Built for HR teams and people managers running upward-feedback or 360 cycles. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind the overall effectiveness score, surfacing concrete behaviors instead of generic ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Sales Leadership Effectiveness Feedback Survey

Captures how sales reps really experience their leadership team — coaching cadence, trust in strategy, pipeline support, and willingness to recommend the leadership approach to a peer — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific behaviors behind each rep's score instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る