QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Operations & Data

Project Retrospective: Root Causes & Process Fixes

Captures what went well, what broke, and why on a just-completed project, then surfaces the process changes the team would realistically adopt. An AI follow-up reconstructs the actual sequence of events behind the biggest setback instead of settling for a vague 'communication issues' answer. Built for project leads and PMOs running structured retros.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全11問・約6分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this project. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest read on what worked, what didn't, and what should change helps us actually fix things next time. About 6-8 minutes.

Q02
オピニオンスケール必須

Overall, how successful was this project relative to its original goals (scope, timeline, quality)?

スケール: 1 – 7
最小:Complete failure最大:Complete success
Q03
マトリクス必須

Rate how each part of the project went.

7行 × 3列
  • Planning & scope definition
  • Stakeholder communication & alignment
  • Resourcing & staffing
  • Technical execution
  • Testing & quality assurance
  • ほか2件
列: Went poorly · Went okay · Went well
Q04
選択式必須

Which of these contributed to the project's biggest setbacks? Select all that apply.

  • Unclear or shifting requirements
  • Scope creep
  • Insufficient staffing or skills
  • Poor communication across teams
  • Unrealistic timeline or estimates
  • Technical debt or legacy systems
  • Lack of stakeholder buy-in
  • Dependency delays from other teams
  • Unclear ownership or decision rights
Q05
自由回答（長文）必須

In your own words, describe the single most significant failure or near-miss moment on this project — what happened, and when did the team first notice something was off?

Q06
ランク付け必須

Rank these potential process changes from most to least valuable for this team to adopt on the next project. (Template note: replace with your own candidate process changes before launching, based on internal input.)

  1. Add a formal scope-freeze milestone before build starts
  2. Hold a weekly cross-team sync on dependencies
  3. Build explicit buffer time into estimates
  4. Run a lightweight retro after every sprint, not just at the end
  5. Clarify ownership with a RACI-style breakdown
  6. Increase automated test coverage before release
  7. Improve handoff documentation between teams
ドラッグして順位を付ける
Q07
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct the actual sequence of events behind the single biggest setback the respondent described: what decision or signal came first, who noticed it, how long it took to escalate, and what was tried before it became a real problem. If they named a process change they ranked highest, probe what would concretely block their team from adopting it next time and what would need to be true for it to actually stick.

Q08
オピニオンスケール必須

Realistically, without extra management pressure, how likely is your team to actually adopt the process change you ranked highest?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q09
選択式

Which best describes your role on this project?

  • Project or program lead
  • Individual contributor / builder
  • Product or business owner
  • Engineering or technical lead
  • QA or testing
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
選択式

How long were you involved with this project?

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1-3 months
  • 4-6 months
  • More than 6 months
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you for the candid feedback. Responses across the team will be compiled into a root-cause summary and a short list of process changes for leadership to review before the next project kicks off.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview block that reconstructs the actual sequence of events behind the biggest setback, instead of stopping at a surface-level 'communication issues' answer
  • Combines quantitative rating (rating-scale, matrix) with open-ended failure analysis (open-text) and a ranking exercise for prioritizing realistic process fixes
  • Asks a grounded feasibility question — how likely the team is to act on changes without extra management pressure — which static templates don't probe
  • Segments respondents by role and project tenure (multiple-choice) so PMOs can weight perspectives when reading the auto-generated report

SurveyMonkey

Project Retrospective Questions Template

A fielding-ready retrospective template covering standard post-project reflection questions. It's built on SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure with broad question-type support and easy distribution. However, it appears to be a fixed question set rather than one that adapts based on a respondent's answers.

優れている点

  • Ready-to-deploy template on a mature survey platform
  • Likely covers standard retrospective categories (what went well/poorly)
  • Easy to customize question wording within SurveyMonkey's editor

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into vague answers like 'communication issues'
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

Jotform

Project Changes Report Form Template

This is a static form for logging project changes/reports rather than a purpose-built root-cause retrospective survey, so it's a partial and somewhat tangential comparison. It benefits from Jotform's flexible form-builder and integrations. It's not designed to surface why a setback happened, just to record what changed.

優れている点

  • Highly customizable drag-and-drop form fields
  • Good for structured documentation/reporting workflows
  • Integrates with Jotform's broader app ecosystem

物足りない点

  • Not designed as a reflective retrospective survey — closer to a change-log form
  • No adaptive AI questioning to reconstruct event sequences
  • No built-in scoring, AI interview, or auto-generated analysis report

よくあるご質問

「Project Retrospective: Root Causes & Process Fixes」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が11問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this project. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Y…」・「Overall, how successful was this project relative to its original goals (scope, timeline, quality)?」・「Rate how each part of the project went.」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、11問を約6分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Operations & Data

Digital Transformation Readiness & Change Fatigue Survey

Assesses how ready employees are for digital transformation across tool adoption willingness, skill confidence, process pain points, and change fatigue. Built for operations, IT, and transformation leaders sequencing a rollout. An AI follow-up digs into the specific reason behind hesitation or exhaustion that scale scores alone can't explain.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Agile Sprint Retrospective Feedback Survey

Captures how a development team felt about the sprint that just ended — goal completion, planning accuracy, collaboration, and workload sustainability — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind blockers and missed goals instead of the sanitized version teams give in stand-up.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation

Captures how a group or team performed on a shared project — coordination, workload fairness, communication, and overall output quality — for managers, educators, or project leads reviewing team dynamics after a collaboration ends. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision that most helped or hurt the group's performance, going beyond generic ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Cross-Department Performance & Collaboration Review

Captures how internal stakeholders experience working with a specific department — responsiveness, quality, communication, and reliability — plus a trade-off exercise on what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent interaction behind the numbers so leaders get concrete, fixable detail instead of vague ratings.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Internal Process Improvement Diagnostic Survey

Diagnoses friction in a specific internal process — where time gets lost, which steps break down, and what to fix first — built for ops leads, IT, or process owners running a targeted improvement review. A trade-off ranking surfaces the top pain point, and the AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example instead of a generic complaint.

テンプレートを見る
Operations & Data

Client Project Satisfaction & Delivery Review

Measures how satisfied clients or stakeholders are with a completed or in-flight project — covering scope clarity, timeliness, budget adherence, communication, and deliverable quality — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind the overall rating instead of a generic star score. Built for agencies, consultancies, and internal project teams running post-project or milestone reviews.

テンプレートを見る