QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
無料で始める
すべてのテンプレート
Industry-Specific

Continuous Improvement Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures how well your continuous improvement or Kaizen-style program actually functions day to day — suggestion volume, leadership follow-through, training gaps, and real barriers — for operations and HR teams running lean or quality initiatives. An AI follow-up reconstructs what actually happened to a recent improvement idea instead of general opinions about the program.

このテンプレートを使うほかのテンプレートを見る

設問の例

テンプレートの内容をプレビューできます。すべての設問は公開前に自由に編集できます。

全12問・約7分
Q01
メッセージ

Thanks for taking part! This survey looks at how our continuous improvement process is actually working for you — what's helping, what's getting in the way. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Honest answers matter more than positive ones. About 6 minutes.

Q02
選択式必須

In the last 3 months, how many process improvement ideas have you submitted, formally or informally?

  • None
  • 1-2
  • 3-5
  • 6 or more
Q03
オピニオンスケール必須

How confident are you that a suggestion you submit will actually get reviewed and acted on?

スケール: 1 – 5
最小:Not at all confident最大:Extremely confident
Q04
マトリクス必須

How much do you agree with each statement about continuous improvement where you work?

5行 × 5列
  • I have enough time set aside to work on process improvements
  • Leadership actively supports continuous improvement efforts
  • Employees who submit ideas receive recognition for it
  • I've had adequate training on improvement tools and methods (e.g., Kaizen, PDCA, Six Sigma)
  • Follow-up happens on submitted ideas within a reasonable timeframe
列: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
ベスト・ワースト選択（MaxDiff）必須

Which of these get in the way of continuous improvement most, and which matter least?

  • Lack of time to work on improvements
  • Unclear process for submitting ideas
  • Little or no recognition for contributions
  • Insufficient training on improvement tools
  • No follow-up after ideas are submitted
  • Fear of criticism or blame if an idea fails
  • Too much bureaucracy or too many approval layers
  • Lack of visible leadership support
各セットで最も良いもの・最も悪いものを選択最も良い:Biggest barrier最も悪い:Smallest barrier
Q06
評価スケール必須

Overall, how would you rate the continuous improvement process at your organization today?

範囲: 1 – 5
最小:Poor最大:Excellent
Q07
ポイント配分

Thinking about the time you personally spend on continuous improvement work, allocate 100 points across these activities based on where your time actually goes.

  • Identifying problems or opportunities
  • Implementing approved fixes
  • Measuring and tracking results
  • Training or coaching others
  • Administrative paperwork and reporting
100ポイントを配分
Q08
AIインタビュー

Reconstruct what happened to the most recent improvement idea the respondent submitted or was aware of: what the idea was, what step it's stuck at or how it was resolved, and how long that took. Anchor on concrete dates and people involved rather than impressions. If they said they've submitted none in the last 3 months, probe specifically why not — unclear process, past bad experience, or genuinely no ideas — and dig into whichever barrier they rated as biggest in the previous question.

Q09
オピニオンスケール必須

How likely are you to recommend participating in this continuous improvement program to a coworker?

スケール: 0 – 10
最小:Not at all likely最大:Extremely likely
Q10
選択式

Which best describes your role?

  • Front-line or production staff
  • Team lead or supervisor
  • Middle management
  • Senior leadership or executive
  • Support function (HR, IT, Finance, etc.)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
選択式

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 3-5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
メッセージ

That's everything — thank you! Your answers will be pooled with your team's to spot where the improvement process is working and where it's stalling, so it can actually get fixed.

含まれる機能

  • AIによる深掘り

    自由回答に合わせてAIが追加で質問し、固定のフォームでは拾えない具体的な内容を引き出します。

  • 注意確認設問

    急いだ回答や質の低い回答者を除外する仕組みを標準で備えています。

  • AIが作成する設問文

    文言、設問の順序、条件分岐をAIが調査の目的に合わせて作成します。

  • 自動レポート

    回答が集まると、テーマ、引用、わかりやすい要約が自動で作成されます。

他ツールとの比較

ほかのアンケートツールで最も近いテンプレートを調べました。それぞれの優れている点と、このテンプレートがさらに踏み込んでいる点をまとめています。

このテンプレートを選ぶ理由

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened to a respondent's most recent submitted improvement idea, rather than just collecting general opinions
  • Combines quantitative measures (suggestion volume, agreement matrix, time-allocation breakdown, max-diff on barriers) with qualitative depth in a single flow
  • Separates role and tenure so operations and HR teams can segment results by who is closest to the shop floor versus leadership
  • Closes with a recommend-to-participate question and transparent framing that responses feed into a team-level report, supporting ongoing program tracking

SurveySparrow

Continuous Improvement Form Template

A static form template aimed at collecting continuous improvement ideas or feedback within an organization. It's ready to field quickly but is structured as a straightforward form rather than a diagnostic survey into program effectiveness, follow-through, or barriers. Best suited for basic idea intake rather than measuring how well a CI program actually runs.

優れている点

  • Quick to deploy as a ready-made form
  • Fits SurveySparrow's broader survey/form platform for distribution and basic reporting
  • Simple structure likely easy for respondents to complete

物足りない点

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct what happened to a specific submitted idea
  • No mechanism to probe leadership follow-through or training gaps beyond fixed questions
  • No published methodology or per-response quality scoring

SurveyMonkey

Tool And Process Improvement Survey Template

A fixed-question survey template focused on evaluating tools and process improvement efforts generally. It offers standard survey logic and reporting through SurveyMonkey's platform, but reads as a general opinion survey rather than one designed to trace the fate of individual improvement ideas or quantify time spent on CI work.

優れている点

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established distribution and analytics tools
  • Pre-built template reduces setup time for common process-improvement questions
  • Familiar rating/opinion-scale format for respondents

物足りない点

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a real recent incident or idea
  • No constant-sum or max-diff style tradeoff questions evident for prioritizing barriers
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses

よくあるご質問

「Continuous Improvement Program Effectiveness Survey」テンプレートにはどのような設問が含まれていますか？

すぐに使える設問が12問含まれており、最初の設問は次のとおりです：「Thanks for taking part! This survey looks at how our continuous improvement process is actually working for you — what's…」・「In the last 3 months, how many process improvement ideas have you submitted, formally or informally?」・「How confident are you that a suggestion you submit will actually get reviewed and acted on?」。すべての設問は上でプレビューでき、自由に編集できます。

このアンケートの回答にはどのくらい時間がかかりますか？

回答者は通常、12問を約7分で回答し終えます。

テンプレートは編集できますか？

はい。公開前であれば、すべての設問、選択肢、順序を編集できます。設問の追加や削除のほか、調査の目的に合わせた作り直しをAIエディターに依頼することもできます。

このテンプレートは無料で使えますか？

はい。エディターで開けば、すぐに編集を始められます。お試しにアカウントは不要で、無料プランでアンケートを公開できます。

公開の準備はできましたか？

このテンプレートをエディターで開いてみてください。最初の回答者が目にする前に、すべてを自由に変更できます。

このテンプレートを使う無料で始める

関連テンプレート

似たテーマのほかの調査もご覧ください。

すべて見る
Industry-Specific

Product Warranty Registration Experience Survey

Measures how easily customers complete (or abandon) warranty registration, what motivates them to bother, and where the process breaks down. Built for product, customer care, and CX teams optimizing registration funnels, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment a respondent almost gave up.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Meeting Effectiveness and Planning Survey

Measures how well meetings are planned, run, and followed up on — cadence, agenda discipline, and the biggest time-wasters — for teams and ops leaders auditing their meeting culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a recent unproductive meeting to surface the specific root cause behind the numbers.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Diversity Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether diversity training changes real workplace behavior, not just satisfaction — covering relevance, confidence applying concepts, and inclusion climate. An AI follow-up interview digs into a specific moment participants applied (or struggled to apply) what they learned, for L&D and DEI teams evaluating training impact.

テンプレートを見る
Industry-Specific

Employee Recognition Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures how often employees are recognized, how fair and meaningful that recognition feels, and whether it comes more from managers or peers. An AI follow-up digs into a specific recent recognition moment to surface what actually made it land — or fall flat — beyond the survey ratings.

テンプレートを見る